What's new

Bangladesh stands by India; slams Pakistan for statement that India interfered during 1971 crisis

Banglasdesh was created through foreign sponsored terror. That is enough for me for a country or a purported 'freedom movement' to be questionable.

Bengalis also killed their own founder in just 3 years.
Bangladesh was created through a struggle for humanity against colonialism by Pakistan, not very different from how South Asia threw away colonialism of the Britishers.
 
.
We don't really care whether creation of Pakistan was a mistake or not. They are here and that is the end of it.

What matters is that we know these arab lovers will go to any length to keep our region backwards, because for them these lands and people don't matter, from their mentality, only superior arab masters matter and everyone should be subservient as well.

So they are trying their damnedest to ensure that our region does not have connectivity, trade and prosperity, innovation by blocking everything.


We must exclude them from all our endeavours and progress despite them trying to keep us back. Let them wallow in the filth of illiteracy, ISIS, middle east and their national passion - jihad.

Proving the mistake part helps us actually. So that BD ideology dont shift to become pure again. And India gets legitimacy in Kashmir.
 
.
Who tells you these conspiracy theories?

Pakistan was not asked to join BIMSTEC by India or any of the members.
The same way Pakistan was not asked to join BBIN by India or any of the other members.

The only thing Pakistan blocked was SAARC agreements.

The entire reason why groupings like BIMSTEC and BBIN are being formed by South Asians is to exclude Pakistan.

Since entire South Asia is tired of Pakistani shenanigans and bowing to foreign powers, they decided to form separate multilateral groups to get these agreements to go ahead.

Oh really do we bow to foreign pressures, what about India backing off from IPI pipeline, under whose pressure did you leave that project, please do tell !!!
 
.
Tell me any official Indian report in those many many many many reports.

Indians don't document crimes in India, let alone in Kashmir. You can look at my past threads and you'll find many reports (UN, HRW, US) documenting Indian crimes against humanity (rapes, murder, missing persons, destruction of property, etc) in IOK.
 
.
Banglasdesh was created through foreign sponsored terror. That is enough for me for a country or a purported 'freedom movement' to be questionable.

Bengalis also killed their own founder in just 3 years.
no sir deu to there majority the bangladeshies were the main reason that pakistan billgot passedand got created in the first place and the ground work for that started in 1905 try googling divission of bengal by lord clive in 1905

try also googling"direct action day"

the main seed of bengalies hatred were sowed when so called fair skinned martial race and feudal mindset west pakistanies started looking down upon bengalies for there short frames and dark skin tone

and to have a sicological superiorty degraded bangla imposed URDU as national language for both west and east pakistanies

and if that was not enof instead of giving importence to majority bengalies gave more importence to urdu speaking "bihari muslims/razakarrs"

but since the real reason why majority muslims/bengalies supported pakistan was the land reforms in which they were promised lands holded by minority hindu bengali land lords after they joined pakistan but instead the major chunk of lands were distribeuted to minority urdu speaking bihari muslims

and if that all was not enof and deu to already silentlli simmering anger and frustaion in bengalies west pakistani ruling elite instead of shairng power after the elections post independence deprived legitimate winners of the powerand isntead of using so called "bhaicharre ka zam zam"intentionalli degraded even pro west pakistan bengalies and rewarded them with something called "operation searchlight"

india onli reacted after millons of east pakistanies crossed over into indian territorry to escape geonocide by west pakistani army and there razzakar dogs and rest asthey say is history

dont beleave me goand read shahabnama by Sr.pakistani diplomat qutub ullah shahab or humud ur rehman commission report
 
.
Buddy open your eyes, your modi has made you delusional, Pak-China Corridor (PCEC) is further going to be connected with another corridor China is establishing SREB (Silk Road Economic Belt), which would connect with Europe via Central Asia, Xinjiang alone borders Tajkistan, Kyrgistan, Kazakistan, Russia, India and Pakistan, PCEC will end up in Kashghar in Xinjiang and connected with Central Asia and Europe through SREB, Pakistan doesnt even care what groupings you make, Bangladesh, Nepal, Myammar, Bhutan and Thailand don't have any cultural, religious, military and social links with Pakistan, they have literally zero impact on our neighbourhood, we literally don't give a hoot what kind of groupings you make in that part of the world !!!
We are talking about South Asia yes?
We are not talking about trade corridors with extra-regional countries. India too has trade corridors being made but that is not the topic of discussion here.

The point was that Pakistan used its membership in SAARC to act as a proxy for China and has blocked the rest of South Asia from moving ahead.

In recognition of that, India and other South Asian countries formed 2 multilateral groups -
BIMSTEC and BBIN so that those agreements that Pakistan is blocking at SAARC can move ahead using these multilateral groups.

And none of the South Asian countries asked for Pakistan to be included - not even by Sri Lanka.
 
Last edited:
. .
Indians don't document crimes in India, let alone in Kashmir. You can look at my past threads and you'll find many reports (UN, HRW, US) documenting Indian crimes against humanity (rapes, murder, missing persons, destruction of property, etc) in IOK.
Means you have no official report.

Go ahead. Cry me a river
 
.
Oh really do we bow to foreign pressures, what about India backing off from IPI pipeline, under whose pressure did you leave that project, please do tell !!!
We have stated the reasons time and again-


1. Quid Pro Quo - The nuclear deal was in exchange of India dropping support for IPI. The term pressure implies India would let go of its interests for foreign powers. Like how Pakistan let IPI go for nothing in exchange.

In our case, we dont accept anyone's pressure. We are far too big a country and too powerful economically and militarily to be under any other country's pressure.

We made a deal which would have given us much more than simple energy supply. Today we buy and sell nuclear technology with the world. And our domestic Uranium is completely for weapon making and experimental research.


2. Iran's pricing.
We conveyed to Iran that their prices were abnormal and far too high. They were benchmarking their gas prices to petrol prices when the gas price index across the world were falling. We even communicated this to Pakistanis, that the deal they are signing is wrong because the world prices on gas are going to continue going down!

3. Pipeline coming through Pakistan is a security threat.
We suggested undersea pipeline, however that was too expensive at the time.
 
.
We are talking about South Asia yes?
We are not talking about trade corridors with extra-regional countries. India too has trade corridors being made but that is not the topic of discussion here.

The point was that Pakistan used its membership in SAARC to act as a proxy for China and has blocked the rest of South Asia from moving ahead.

In recognition of that, India and other South Asian countries formed 2 multilateral groups - BIMSTEC and BBIN so that those agreements that Pakistan is blocking at SAARC can move ahead using these multilateral groups.

And none of the South Asian countries asked for Pakistan to be included - not even by Sri Lanka.


Bangladesh,Sri Lanka and even Nepal are encouraging China to join SAARC.. It was indian butthurt that it created a useless india - bangladesh corridor and offered us to pitch in... Which is of no economic value for us... We have better connectivity by sea to those nations anyways.... Bangladesh isn't even a significant trading partner ours .. Expect for Pakistani investors investing in Bangladesh!
 
. .
what possibly could we benefit from more conectivity with states like nepal bhutan and bangladesh,we have no intentions of trade with south east asia,we have road link to major economies of the world china,iran,turkey and can easily trade with whole of middle least unlike india which is stuck with nepal and bangladesh:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
We have stated the reasons time and again-


1. Quid Pro Quo - The nuclear deal was in exchange of India dropping support for IPI. The term pressure implies India would let go of its interests for foreign powers. Like how Pakistan let IPI go for nothing in exchange.

In our case, we dont' accept anyone's pressure. We made a deal which would have given us much more than simple energy supply.

2. Iran's pricing.
We conveyed to Iran that their prices were abnormal and far too high. They were benchmarking their gas prices to petrol prices when the gas price index across the world were falling. We even communicated this to Pakistanis, that the deal they are signing is wrong because the world prices on gas are going to continue going down!

3. Pipeline coming through Pakistan is a security threat.
We suggested undersea pipeline, however that was too expensive at the time.


Iranian oil is probably cheaper than others... (They are building an oil refinery in Gwadar - MOU signed)... The construction of IPP has started .. They are interested to join CPEC.. Etx...



You boggled under pressure .. We don't know ...

As for security concerns and underwater pipelines .. Yeah right.. Is that why you are interested in TAPI???


Your under water pipeline itself is a pipe dream... You can't build it without our permission (Pak maritime boundary extension) now makes its virtually impossible for you to build one anyways.. Unless you have trillions of dollars to waste.
 
. .
Buddy open your eyes, your modi has made you delusional, Pak-China Corridor (PCEC) is further going to be connected with another corridor China is establishing SREB (Silk Road Economic Belt), which would connect with Europe via Central Asia, Xinjiang alone borders Tajkistan, Kyrgistan, Kazakistan, Russia, India and Pakistan, PCEC will end up in Kashghar in Xinjiang and connected with Central Asia and Europe through SREB, Pakistan doesnt even care what groupings you make, Bangladesh, Nepal, Myammar, Bhutan and Thailand don't have any cultural, religious, military and social links with Pakistan, they have literally zero impact on our neighbourhood, we literally don't give a hoot what kind of groupings you make in that part of the world !!!

Silk Road Economic Belt is not going to happen...too many countries and I am sure no consensus will emerge.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom