masud
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,748
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
yeah and the most rediculas is.......mistal class.Nah, they are acquiring ships from the French.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah and the most rediculas is.......mistal class.Nah, they are acquiring ships from the French.
yeah and the most rediculas is.......mistal class.
no it,s not.............it,s international polatics.it is more like show of power
That actually makes sense....yeah and the most rediculas is.......mistal class.
I believe in make in India but our 2 shipyards who have experience with frigates arent freei thought you believe in made in India and India is self-depended who builds indigenous warships
True about supply n demandWell, supply and demand at work, I would say. If India isn't interested (it could get the necessary engines directly from Ukraine), where are the Russians going to go with these ships? And if they are stuck with them, prices wil drop, fast. There being an alternative buyer, should also affect the price for the 'preferred' buyer, India.
India - or any client - can directly order the GtUs from Ukraine (who are stuck with 3 sets of GtUs that they won't be delivering to Russia) , and 'drop' them in.
IN already has training, maintenance and logistics for these ships in place, so adding more is relatively low cost. That is different for BN.I believe in make in India but our 2 shipyards who have experience with frigates arent free
If Russia partners with our pipapav then it will be a time consuming process
True about supply n demand
But i think the chances of India buying upgraded talwars at a higher price got more chances than Bangladesh going for the frigates
IN already has training, maintenance and logistics for these ships in place, so adding more is relatively low cost. That is different for BN.
Ships from the Bangladesh and U.S. navies gather in formation in the Bay of Bengal during Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Bangladesh 2015. This is#partnershipsmatter in action with the U.S.
Navy and Bangladesh Navy working together at sea
In picture :
• Freedom-class littoral combat ship USS Fort Worth (LCS-3)
• Type 053H2 (Jianghu-III) Class Guided Missile Frigate BNS Abu Bakar
(F-15)
• Modified Ulsan-class (DW-2000H) Guided Missile Frigate BNS
Bangabandhu (F-25)
• Castle Class Guided Missile Corvette BNS Dhaleshwari (F36)
© CARAT - Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training
These russian frigates won't be anywhere as cheap as $300m, even without the main engines and subsystems. The lowest price that you could expect for these are about $500m to $550m each, then you'll be in trouble....here's why....say by some majical reason we managed to persuade the Russians to sell these frigates to us for under $500m each, do you think the Ukrainians would sell us the turbines for anywhere what they were selling them to the Russians? Knowing that were now stuck with these, with the only option to fit them with the Ukrainian turbines they would just hike the price. Its a bad idea, you'd end up paying a lot more in the end.
Just look at the price the Indians paid for each of their latest Talwar class frigates to get an idea of the cost. Then remember our budget is around $570m for 2 LIGHT frigates.
I didn't know the frigates were that expensive.
If Ukrainians try to milk us, couldn't we go with the GE LM2500 turbines? These decades proven units are used in the BNS Somudra Joy class as well. I think the latest Indian Kolkata class destroyers also run on four of those units. At most the Russian frigates will need two for their size.
But yeah I do see your point.
So if this doesn't work out then is the Chinese C28 the best choice?
sir, i am quiet interested to know how ?That actually makes sense....
@Penguin bhai - does India's Naval planning and strategy allow for purchasing three more?
These are reportedly *based on* the Talwar class design. However are they identical?
What - if any, are the differences?
What do you mean 'rusted out'. These are brand new hulls, building. There is no comparison whatsoever with the starting situation of the Gorshkov T-AKR when the conversion to INS Vikramaditya began.Also - Bangladesh could get two hulls sans engine (hopefully not rusted out like the Vikramaditya scenario) and duplicate them locally (after powerplant and Chinese weapons integration) with ToT and licensing. Unless the completed hulls come already with a weapons and sensors fit.
1. Look at the ongoing modernization effort of the EN. Is entails a red sea and a med fleet.sir, i am quiet interested to know how ?
yeah i got it, anti-piracy ops is absolatly right, but against israel mistal is no more then a iron coffin. but it makes sence israel and egypt is not going to war in near future.1. Look at the ongoing modernization effort of the EN. Is entails a red sea and a med fleet.
2. Look at the age and state of their current landing assets. Pretty useless, old, manpower intensive small stuff
Mistrals make good command ships, have hospitals, their helicopter assets are way more flexible than the small landing craft. Esp with an eye to anti-piracy ops in the Arabian sea.
My prefered options are German scaled down MEKO A-200SAN Valor class @ 2700 tonnes instead of 3700 tonnes
@damiendehorn agreed
Valour class is a great design (Stealthy, well-armed), but I checked Wiki and it said displacement is closer to 3700 tonnes. So maybe they quoted wrong?
The hull and other modifications were made to the Meko A200 design so it could survive high Sea States around the cape. A lot of South African (DENEL manufactured) weapons (such as a 32-canister VLS package of the Umkhonto point defense missile) is now offered with the standard A-200 weapons fit.
However the Algerians paid about Euro 2 Billion for their two A-200's (maybe the SAAB weapons fit was higher grade?)
First Algerian MEKO A-200 frigate undocked - IHS Jane's 360
@Penguin bhai what are your thoughts?