Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Behave like elite I asked you logical question.its may be off topic. But the thread is already derailed.even i can bring down Su30mki by throughing a brick at it let alone SAM system
this is how elite rolls, now shoo shoo you can check yourself out SAM system of BDBehave like elite I asked you logical question.its may be off topic. But the thread is already derailed.
Sam systems which name one and how many is they effective against any 4.5 gen fighters of present??that is how elite rolls, now shoo shoo you can check yourself out SAM system of BD
you have internet, go figureSam systems which name one and how many is they effective against any 4.5 gen fighters of present??
I know already few fm-90 (HQ-7) so you think with such classic Sam system you think you can shoot down a squadron of modern 4.5 gen fighters with advanced EW &ECM capabilities.you have internet, go figure
so are you saying HQ-7A is not good SAM ?I know already few fm-90 (HQ-7) so you think with such classic Sam system you think you can shoot down a squadron of modern 4.5 gen fighters with advanced EW &ECM capabilities.
Ps: hasina ji ko bolo Akash purchase karei
with china's help, it is equivallent to Type59Gbut is that indeginious upgrade or its a help from another nation any way looks good and looks identical to a chinese upgrade.
Its good but almost 26 years old easily to escape by today advance EW'S not like latest HQ-9 but you know about chinese quality it will only can give 40% assurance it's best you acquire western Sam systems like spyder system or PAC-3.so are you saying HQ-7A is not good SAM ?
btw i have another news for you btw it is just part of big plan hehehhe
TRISHUL: KS-1A MR-SAM Scores First Export Success
how it is 26 years old ? are you saying that first T-90 and T-90MS tanks are same ?Its good but almost 26 years old easily to escape by today advance EW'S not like latest HQ-9 but you know about chinese quality it will only can give 40% assurance it's best you acquire western Sam systems like spyder system or PAC-3.
I was talking about Fm-90 which was developed in 1988 as for current status I still say go for Western products. Leave Turky may be they have some cash constraints. although I like South Korean options is good they are joined with some western partners firms such as thales group that's the direction bd should go lot of depedance on chinese maal is not goodhow it is 26 years old ? are you saying that first T-90 and T-90MS tanks are same ?
you may do not like china but don't understimate their tech, even Turky is thinking of buying chinese SAM
all i see here is you --->
we don't need to divert all our assets from boarders to fight with BD... We have sufficient troops to take down our vassal state. ..India has both Pakistan and China to worry about as well.
BD has only India.
are you sure it is FM-90 ? or it was FM-80 ? you are not good reader. and here you again -->I was talking about Fm-90 which was developed in 1988 as for current status I still say go for Western products. Leave Turky may be they have some cash constraints. although I like South Korean options is good they are joined with some western partners firms such as thales group that's the direction bd should go lot of depedance on chinese maal is not good
Its fm-90 my friend sorry it's 1998 not 1988 is typed wrong still 16 year old please check it was developed from fm-80 which even much old tech of cold war era. Not comparison with Today advance Sam like Barak, SPYDER, S-400, Hq-9.Still export same will give minimum cover best go for Co-development project with South Koreansare you sure it is FM-90 ? or it was FM-80 ? you are not good reader. and here you again -->