Back off, Britain! China issues furious warning to rivals over plans to deploy warships HMS Queen Elizabeth

[antonius123]

Off course we can do rough assumption, as long as there's no data on the precision of the said missile. I mean yeah it's a hypersonic DF but it could have a CEP of at least 10 meter. Who knows.

Well, then we can assume otherwise that China has better than what US is testing now, since China has operate hypersonic much earlier and keep developing it + China HQ-9 is more accurate than US PAC based on Turkey test. This is more logical assumption

For sure, China has been operating it quite long while US is still testing it

 

[Globenim]

Furious Indian trolls fuming over furious British cries over Chinas calm and coordinated response on regular diplomatic channels to furious British threats and saber rattling over Chinas calm and coordinated development of Chinas legal territories

Oh look, its another day nothing happend

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Yes my friend from Maryland, please switch those radars so that the HARMs could find a way home.

And B-2 comes along fighter escorts not with SEAD and DEAD aircraft, and do research before you post

 

[F-22Raptor]

Well, then we can assume otherwise that China has better than what US is testing now, since China has operate hypersonic much earlier and keep developing it + China HQ-9 is more accurate than US PAC based on Turkey test. This is more logical assumption

For sure, China has been operating it quite long while US is still testing it

China has nothing better and if you did it would have already been tested.

 

[striver44]

And B-2 comes along fighter escorts not with SEAD and DEAD aircraft, and do research before you post

Ok troll

 

[Nasr]

View attachment 702814

China's Navy (PLAN Battle Group) Order of Battle in 2021
View attachment 702813


Let place your bet guys
This is 21st Century anyway, not 18th Century LOL

My dear friend, what you need to understand is that britain isn't going into South China Sea by itself. What China must know and recognize is that britain doesn't even sneeze without their mighty american's permission. So if anyone ever thought that this tiny brit navy is ever gonna take China, head to head, they are thinking wrong.

The entire design and architecture of the Western Alliance, i.e NATO, is to fight together against their adversary. One only has to look at all the wars fought in the last 75 years, to understand the mechanism of NATO. Be it Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Syria, Libya or Afghanistan. Every single war was fought with the combined effort of NATO member states. And their primary war-mongering member states are, america, britain and france.

These zionist owned and controlled states cannot, would not and have not fought wars by themselves. Because whenever they have tried, they nearly got crushed. The Las Malvinas War (the brits illegally occupied islands that belong to Argentina) saw Argentina wipe out 7 of british Navy ships, that included 2 destroyers and 2 frigates. The war only ended in british victory, when britain managed to (like a whining weasel) successfully persuade france to not supply Argentina any Exocet anti-ship missiles. Prior to that, britain managed to buy out and block-out all Exocet anti-ship missiles available in the Black Market. It is clear to identify, for anyone with a working brain, that had france not helped britain by not supplying any Exocet missiles to Argentina. Then today Las Malvinas would be Argentinian as is the word Silver in the Latin language.

China, I hope, recognizes this fact and works establish robust and powerful alliances. China needs to work bringing Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines in as close allies. The more these countries become closer to China, the further they will sway away from america. China, as powerful as it is becoming, should not and ought not go into to a fight with Zionist-West, alone. Because that is exactly what they want China to do. And China ....... you will not ever find an ally and friend, better than Russia.

 

[gambit]

In what way US is ahead?

The US is ahead in the sense that despite treaty limitations created from the Cold War and carried on to this day, the wording of the treaties do not inhibit R/D but only deployment, so the US have not been idle in R/D, resulting in whenever there is an opportunity, we ended up deployment PDQ. Everyone knew this but the problem is you cannot ban R/D. The most you can ban is testing and we can R/D up to that point, and even then, not all treaties have the same limitations. So in the end, the then Soviets and today's Russia know that when it comes to US, treaty limitations are above %75 useless.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Ok troll

so you have no answer for my logical and sensible posts, calling me troll shows you you're farting baseless every Chinese threads

 

[antonius123]

China has nothing better and if you did it would have already been tested.

What is US' equivalent for DF-21D and DF-26 which China has been operating long time ago?

China Tests Long-Range Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles As U.S. Spy Plane Watches It All

China's anti-ship ballistic missile capabilities remain something of a mystery, but their strategic purpose is anything but.

www.thedrive.com

The US is ahead in the sense that despite treaty limitations created from the Cold War and carried on to this day, the wording of the treaties do not inhibit R/D but only deployment, so the US have not been idle in R/D, resulting in whenever there is an opportunity, we ended up deployment PDQ. Everyone knew this but the problem is you cannot ban R/D. The most you can ban is testing and we can R/D up to that point, and even then, not all treaties have the same limitations. So in the end, the then Soviets and today's Russia know that when it comes to US, treaty limitations are above %75 useless.

Even so, the R&D on hypersonic will be limited due to the treaty - because of unability to test it.
China has materialized it, while US is starting to catch up now; and we know now in term of R&D budget China now is willing to spend more than what US will spend in term of nominal value.

 

[Place Of Space]

My dear friend, what you need to understand is that britain isn't going into South China Sea by itself. What China must know and recognize is that britain doesn't even sneeze without their mighty american's permission. So if anyone ever thought that this tiny brit navy is ever gonna take China, head to head, they are thinking wrong.

The entire design and architecture of the Western Alliance, i.e NATO, is to fight together against their adversary. One only has to look at all the wars fought in the last 75 years, to understand the mechanism of NATO. Be it Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Syria, Libya or Afghanistan. Every single war was fought with the combined effort of NATO member states. And their primary war-mongering member states are, america, britain and france.

These zionist owned and controlled states cannot, would not and have not fought wars by themselves. Because whenever they have tried, they nearly got crushed. The Las Malvinas War (the brits illegally occupied islands that belong to Argentina) saw Argentina wipe out 7 of british Navy ships, that included 2 destroyers and 2 frigates. The war only ended in british victory, when britain managed to (like a whining weasel) successfully persuade france to not supply Argentina any Exocet anti-ship missiles. Prior to that, britain managed to buy out and block-out all Exocet anti-ship missiles available in the Black Market. It is clear to identify, for anyone with a working brain, that had france not helped britain by not supplying any Exocet missiles to Argentina. Then today Las Malvinas would be Argentinian as is the word Silver in the Latin language.

China, I hope, recognizes this fact and works establish robust and powerful alliances. China needs to work bringing Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines in as close allies. The more these countries become closer to China, the further they will sway away from america. China, as powerful as it is becoming, should not and ought not go into to a fight with Zionist-West, alone. Because that is exactly what they want China to do. And China ....... you will not ever find an ally and friend, better than Russia.

There is a old saying in Chinese: When the big tree ( leader in an ally ) falls down, all the monkeys in the tree will leave.
Before China capable of coping with the "big tree", it's meaningless China seek for alliance.

 

[gambit]

Even so, the R&D on hypersonic will be limited due to the treaty - because of unability to test it. China has materialized it, while US is starting to catch up now; and we know now in term of R&D budget China now is willing to spend more than what US will spend in term of nominal value.

You sure about that? The USAF said we built the next generation of fighter with the first physical test flight after one yr of virtual design and testing.

 

[antonius123]

You sure about that? The USAF said we built the next generation of fighter with the first physical test flight after one yr of virtual design and testing.

Yes, sure.
You are talking about past till recent time when US is the strongest in R&D, I am talking about now and future when China start to be the strongest in R&D.

US was ahead China significantly in fighter plane, sensor and weapon technology she release 5th gen fighter in 1995, 15 years earlier than China, so no wonder if she can still release 6th gen fighter faster, but the gap is closing maybe China will release 6th gen fighter in less than 6 years from now, or even has released it without announcement who knows.