What's new

Azadi March Updates & Discussions

exaggeration nothing much,majority support IK.Dont bother all is well
Fact is; Imran Khan won <30% votes to become PM.
Those 30% included those, who trusted in his words, which became U turns after assuming power.
So i will be surprised if today IK enjoy 15% public support, and if that's the case, IK has no legitimacy to cling to the seat of premiership.
On second count, if IK issue statements on media that reason of his failure is bad team, than again he lost moral grounds to stay put as PM.
May be other's seek his resignation on some other grounds. e.g U-turn, hypocrisy, corruption, violation of 582b, economic hitman, etc. etc.
 
.
If PM Khan had even an iota of decency, he would've resigned after losing Kashmir.

Not to also forget, trying to blackmail China, selling CPEC to the US/IMF and locking up opposition leaders to try and silence them for his own incompetancy.
you should be ashamed of yourself, damaging Pakistan's narrative for your shameless politicians and political parties.
 
. . . .
Fact is; Imran Khan won <30% votes to become PM.
Those 30% included those, who trusted in his words, which became U turns after assuming power.
So i will be surprised if today IK enjoy 15% public support, and if that's the case, IK has no legitimacy to cling to the seat of premiership.
On second count, if IK issue statements on media that reason of his failure is bad team, than again he lost moral grounds to stay put as PM.
May be other's seek his resignation on some other grounds. e.g U-turn, hypocrisy, corruption, violation of 582b, economic hitman, etc. etc.
Nawaz Sharif became PM with 14.8 million votes in 2013, while IK got 16.9 million votes in 2018. Your opinion does not matter patwari.
 
.
But Khan's heavy-handedness against opposition politicians and the country's deteriorating economy have given them the impetus to finally attempt to dislodge his government.
Only legal way this govt can be dislodged is though vote of no-confidence in parliament.

But his critics say he has so far not been able to honor his commitment to the masses.
The economy has already stabilized. As for the jobs, they will come once the growth rate reaches above 4 percent.
 
. .
"The economy has nosedived, prices of essential commodities are touching new heights and people are living in abject poverty. So it is necessary to send him [Prime Minister Khan] packing," Soomro told local media.
So by removing PM, people will come out of abject poverty. Amazing IQ.

Although Khan launched an austerity drive to reduce government expenses, critics say the move has been largely superficial, as the PM's team has no real economic plan to fix Pakistan's serious structural issues.
The IMF's tough bailout conditions have been unpopular, and analysts say the opposition is now ready to use the "public anger" to remove Khan from power.
That's a contradictory statement. First you criticize PM for not initiating structural economic reforms. And once he does that by going to IMF, you call the imposed structural reforms unpopular and causis beli to remove him from power. Seriously how much IQ you PMLN have?

If PM Khan had even an iota of decency, he would've resigned after losing Kashmir
Losing Kashmir? Do enlighten us with your amazing wisdom which parts of Pakistan administered Kashmir were lost by PM Imran Khan?

Not to also forget, trying to blackmail China, selling CPEC to the US/IMF and locking up opposition leaders to try and silence them for his own incompetancy
China was not paying Pakistan for 30 billion dollars worth of trade deficit that occured because of CPEC projects. Pakistan had thus no choice but to go to IMF or default on foreign debt obligations.
 
.
Huge rallies kick off in Pakistan to oust PM Imran Khan

Pakistani PM Khan faces a tough political challenge as an anti-government march to topple his government set off on Sunday. Khan's woes have been aggravated by a deteriorating economy and accusations of bad governance.

Thousands of supporters of a major religious political party gathered Sunday in Pakistan's southern city of Karachi to start an anti-government march on the capital, Islamabad.

The rally was led by Maulana Fazlur Rehman, a powerful religious figure and head of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) party, who claims that Prime Minister Imran Khan came to power last year through rigged elections.

"Prime Minister Imran Khan will have to resign. Hundreds of thousands have gathered in Karachi; what will the government do when people from across the country reach Islamabad?" he told rally participants in Karachi.

Rehman is backed by Pakistan's major opposition parties, including the Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) of three-time former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and the Pakistan People's Party headed by former President Asif Ali Zardari and his son Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari.

The rally participants — expected to be in the hundreds of thousands by the time they reach Islamabad — plan to stage a sit-in protest outside the capital, with a possibility of further rallying closer to the prime minister's house.

"I will announce the future course of action in Islamabad," Rehman said in Karachi.

Such "long marches" have become a common occurrence in Pakistan, with some religious organizations previously attempting to put the capital under siege and resorting to violence.

Although a religious leader, Rehman is a supporter of parliamentary democracy and has served under previous governments.

Khan's 'closeness' to military generals

Mufti Abrar Ahmed, a spokesman for the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party, said Sunday that Rehman would lead the protesters' caravan. He lashed out against Khan, saying that the "illegitimate" government came to power through the army's support.

Although the major political parties denounced last year's general election as "rigged," they chose not to immediately launch protests. But Khan's heavy-handedness against opposition politicians and the country's deteriorating economy have given them the impetus to finally attempt to dislodge his government.

Khan has been accused of receiving indirect support from the country's powerful military — a claim denied by both Khan and the army. Sharif's supporters say their party was not given a level playing field in the run-up to the July 2018 elections, with the judiciary exclusively targeting PML-N officials and the caretaker government unleashing a massive crackdown on PML-N activists.

Talking to local journalists earlier this week, Khan said the army fully backs him against the opposition's attempts to oust him.

Economic woes

Khan came to power after winning a simple majority in the 2018 parliamentary polls on promises to improve the country's economy and provide jobs. But his critics say he has so far not been able to honor his commitment to the masses.

Although Khan launched an austerity drive to reduce government expenses, critics say the move has been largely superficial, as the PM's team has no real economic plan to fix Pakistan's serious structural issues.

With inflation climbing to 8%, the rupee losing a third of its value over the past year, and foreign exchange reserves barely enough to cover two months of imports, Khan's government was forced to turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in May for a bailout package.

The IMF's tough bailout conditions have been unpopular, and analysts say the opposition is now ready to use the "public anger" to remove Khan from power.

Maulana Rashid Mehmood Soomro, a JUI-F official, recently said that a World Economic Forum report found a 3% increase in corruption since Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party came to power.

"The economy has nosedived, prices of essential commodities are touching new heights and people are living in abject poverty. So it is necessary to send him [Prime Minister Khan] packing," Soomro told local media.

https://www.dw.com/en/huge-rallies-kick-off-in-pakistan-to-oust-pm-imran-khan/a-51007239

I hope PM Khan will provide the containers and food to the protestors as he promised on the floor of the house.



He should provide kuffan and place to bury these hordes of corrupt and child molesters.
The problem with IK is that he is too soft. He needs to go after these criminals and their haram eating families. Nawaz Sharif should be allowed to die a painful death ..... his supporters should be rounded up and sent to camps for basic education and re-education. Patwaris should be tested for IQ and those found too low ( which most will be) they should be sent to farms to work as animals.
 
.
I would like to give Imran Khan the suggestion of Army Chief to previous Prime Minister during PTI sit-in in Islamabad: Kindly deal with the matter peacefully and diplomatically, violence on either side should be avoided as it tears the fabric of unity.
Imran Khan is not going to deal with this Dharna. As it is against the establishment.

Fact is; Imran Khan won <30% votes to become PM.
Those 30% included those, who trusted in his words, which became U turns after assuming power.
So i will be surprised if today IK enjoy 15% public support, and if that's the case, IK has no legitimacy to cling to the seat of premiership.
On second count, if IK issue statements on media that reason of his failure is bad team, than again he lost moral grounds to stay put as PM.
May be other's seek his resignation on some other grounds. e.g U-turn, hypocrisy, corruption, violation of 582b, economic hitman, etc. etc
Only fact is he can only be removed constitutionally and not by Dharnas and protests.

He din't lost Kashmir, but he did lost opportunity to win Kashmir with least blood shed and that was 27th february, where he appears to be serving modi, rather than Pakistani nation.
Please enlighten us with your great wisdom how Imran Khan could "win" Kashmir by holding a single Indian pilot as prisoner?
 
.
Please go ahead, i ask for it.

Then continue to ask it. Because there is no accountability in our country.

At least someone tried to set one even if not perfect.

But many among our countrymen opposed to him by any means.

We are left with simple choice :

1— we continue to accuse every government of all the consequences of the previous one.

2 — we support current government in the huge task we have in front of us instead of creating hurdles every corners.



By supporting our government I mean creating public forum like “forum for economic development”, “forum for workforce development”, “forum for critical thinking awareness”, “forum for cities development”, “forum for clean water distribution system development”, “forum for modernising banking system”, “forum for health system improvements”.... etc

By forum I mean public debate involving professionals of those sectors, politicians and civil society members, religious people and liberal people, students, etc etc

It will let people to know the needs, to explain the needs, the ways to fulfill these needs, the constraints (financial, skills, etc) the financial requirements (taxes collection)...

The task is so huge that even in 50 years from now (if we start everything now) we will still be on the beginning of the progress process.

But unfortunately in Pakistan we have habits to follow peer sheer.

So now tell us which option you want to pick ? The number 1 or number 2 ?
 
Last edited:
.
Huge rallies kick off in Pakistan to oust PM Imran Khan

Pakistani PM Khan faces a tough political challenge as an anti-government march to topple his government set off on Sunday. Khan's woes have been aggravated by a deteriorating economy and accusations of bad governance.

Thousands of supporters of a major religious political party gathered Sunday in Pakistan's southern city of Karachi to start an anti-government march on the capital, Islamabad.

The rally was led by Maulana Fazlur Rehman, a powerful religious figure and head of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) party, who claims that Prime Minister Imran Khan came to power last year through rigged elections.

"Prime Minister Imran Khan will have to resign. Hundreds of thousands have gathered in Karachi; what will the government do when people from across the country reach Islamabad?" he told rally participants in Karachi.

Rehman is backed by Pakistan's major opposition parties, including the Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) of three-time former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and the Pakistan People's Party headed by former President Asif Ali Zardari and his son Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari.

The rally participants — expected to be in the hundreds of thousands by the time they reach Islamabad — plan to stage a sit-in protest outside the capital, with a possibility of further rallying closer to the prime minister's house.

"I will announce the future course of action in Islamabad," Rehman said in Karachi.

Such "long marches" have become a common occurrence in Pakistan, with some religious organizations previously attempting to put the capital under siege and resorting to violence.

Although a religious leader, Rehman is a supporter of parliamentary democracy and has served under previous governments.

Khan's 'closeness' to military generals

Mufti Abrar Ahmed, a spokesman for the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party, said Sunday that Rehman would lead the protesters' caravan. He lashed out against Khan, saying that the "illegitimate" government came to power through the army's support.

Although the major political parties denounced last year's general election as "rigged," they chose not to immediately launch protests. But Khan's heavy-handedness against opposition politicians and the country's deteriorating economy have given them the impetus to finally attempt to dislodge his government.

Khan has been accused of receiving indirect support from the country's powerful military — a claim denied by both Khan and the army. Sharif's supporters say their party was not given a level playing field in the run-up to the July 2018 elections, with the judiciary exclusively targeting PML-N officials and the caretaker government unleashing a massive crackdown on PML-N activists.

Talking to local journalists earlier this week, Khan said the army fully backs him against the opposition's attempts to oust him.

Economic woes

Khan came to power after winning a simple majority in the 2018 parliamentary polls on promises to improve the country's economy and provide jobs. But his critics say he has so far not been able to honor his commitment to the masses.

Although Khan launched an austerity drive to reduce government expenses, critics say the move has been largely superficial, as the PM's team has no real economic plan to fix Pakistan's serious structural issues.

With inflation climbing to 8%, the rupee losing a third of its value over the past year, and foreign exchange reserves barely enough to cover two months of imports, Khan's government was forced to turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in May for a bailout package.

The IMF's tough bailout conditions have been unpopular, and analysts say the opposition is now ready to use the "public anger" to remove Khan from power.

Maulana Rashid Mehmood Soomro, a JUI-F official, recently said that a World Economic Forum report found a 3% increase in corruption since Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party came to power.

"The economy has nosedived, prices of essential commodities are touching new heights and people are living in abject poverty. So it is necessary to send him [Prime Minister Khan] packing," Soomro told local media.

https://www.dw.com/en/huge-rallies-kick-off-in-pakistan-to-oust-pm-imran-khan/a-51007239

I hope PM Khan will provide the containers and food to the protestors as he promised on the floor of the house.
Im sure germans would want Pakistan to stop this inflow of afghans into Eu so..they better cooperate and put a lid on dw and hold it accountable for spreading misinformaiton..​
 
.
Yeah huge rallies reach to russia invaded every country that came in their way.

So by removing PM, people will come out of abject poverty. Amazing IQ.



That's a contradictory statement. First you criticize PM for not initiating structural economic reforms. And once he does that by going to IMF, you call the imposed structural reforms unpopular and causis beli to remove him from power. Seriously how much IQ you PMLN have?


Losing Kashmir? Do enlighten us with your amazing wisdom which parts of Pakistan administered Kashmir were lost by PM Imran Khan?


China was not paying Pakistan for 30 billion dollars worth of trade deficit that occured because of CPEC projects. Pakistan had thus no choice but to go to IMF or default on foreign debt obligations.
You do know that you are asking logic to ill mentality person?
 
.
Corrupt criminal mafia and their puppets are in full swing. All corrupt past rulers in jail have low platlets...how ironic. They are all funding and supporting these protests. They don't care about economy or people. It's just a way to pressurise the govt. IK nation is with you. Danda dee kar rakho....chekhain nikalnay dooo.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom