What's new

Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India

No, it has to pass parliament first AND India has to agree to strong conditions of sale.

The party just agreed to change its platform, that's all.

No different from conditions that India already agrees to.


The vote only passed by 20 votes.

Yeah but that was a vote within the labour party. The opposition already support the decision. Makes it an almost overwhelming consensus. I seem to remember you saying it wouldn't happen when we said it will. Funny how Indians predicted the change in the Australian policy while a smart guy like you couldn't.
 
.
How the hell did India manage this? Some people think India cant do anything...I would say- If India cant do anything, there are lots of countries willing to do anything for India...Take that.
 
.
How the hell did India manage this? Some people think India cant do anything...I would say- If India cant do anything, there are lots of countries willing to do anything for India...Take that.

Australia is thinking of itself rather then what India wants.
 
.
Yeh, i don't know why Indians think that it must have been Indian pressure that got it through and theres no other way.

Our country doesn't give into pressure. We make our own decisions that benefit us.
 
.
Australia is thinking of itself rather then what India wants.

Yes I am sure Australia thinks for itself...so do all nations. It was simple business decision...demand and supply. I was wondering how come the Aussies deviated from the strong rules, they imposed on themselves.

You guys denied us uranium in the past stating Rules. We just showed that all these rules are biased, BS and can be bent. This is not arrogance but the outlet to suffering we had due to the sanction all the so called countries with rules put on us.
 
.
Yeh, i don't know why Indians think that it must have been Indian pressure that got it through and theres no other way.

Our country doesn't give into pressure. We make our own decisions that benefit us.

Not Indian pressure alone but this policy had way too many inherent contradictions to stand. The fact that it was a self inflicted blow to the Australian economy as well as the fact that it was seen by India are singling it out thereby affecting general Indo-australian relations played its part. There is no point in having irritants that no one wants anyway.
 
.
Yeh, i don't know why Indians think that it must have been Indian pressure that got it through and theres no other way.

Our country doesn't give into pressure. We make our own decisions that benefit us.

It was'nt Indian pressure. It was just the intrinsic contradictions in the policy which had reduced it to plain old BS.
And Australia (and Australian industry) needs the money, don't it?
 
.
No different from conditions that India already agrees to.




Yeah but that was a vote within the labour party. The opposition already support the decision. Makes it an almost overwhelming consensus. I seem to remember you saying it wouldn't happen when we said it will. Funny how Indians predicted the change in the Australian policy while a smart guy like you couldn't.

I also remember that debate, where not only australian but chinese members also.
 
.
Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India

By James Grubel
SYDNEY | Sun Dec 4, 2011 8:19am IST

(Reuters) - Australia's ruling Labor Party on Sunday endorsed plans to open up uranium sales to India, clearing the way for talks on a bilateral nuclear agreement and resolving an issue that has caused diplomatic tensions between the two nations.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced the plan in November, but needed her party's national policy conference to overturn its ban on selling uranium to countries which are not signatories to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Gillard successfully pushed her uranium policy through the conference, despite an often heated debate and chants from protesters who remain opposed to nuclear energy and weapons.

"We should take a decision that is in our nation's interest, a decision about strengthening our strategic partnership with India in this the Asian century," Gillard said, adding Australia already sold uranium to China, the United States and Japan.

Australia has almost 40 percent of the world's known uranium reserves, but supplies only 19 percent of the world market. It has no nuclear power stations.

India, Asia's third-largest economy and the world's largest democracy, has long complained about the Australian ban and wants more access to uranium to meet an ambitious target for nuclear energy, with plans to build 30 nuclear power stations in the next 20 years.

The move to allow sales to India follows a landmark U.S. agreement to support the civil nuclear programme in India, signed in 2008.

Australia's uranium industry welcomed the policy shift, which it said could lead to more Indian investment in Australian mining projects.

"Chinese, Japanese and Russian companies are seeking out these opportunities and we would expect Indian companies will do the same," Australian Uranium Association chief executive Michael Angwin said.

He said India would potentially buy up to 2,500 tonnes of Australian uranium a year by 2030, although the first sales could still be some years away as it could take several years to negotiate a nuclear safeguards agreement.

Before selling uranium, Australia negotiates nuclear safeguards agreements with customer nations to ensure nuclear material can only be used for energy and not for nuclear weapons.

Australia now has four mines, BHP Billiton's (BHP.AX) (BLT.L) Olympic Dam, potentially the world's biggest; Energy Resources Australia's (ERA.AX) Ranger mine; the Beverly mine, owned by U.S. company General Atomics, and Honeymoon mines, owned by Uranium One (UUU.TO) and Mitsui & Co (8031.T).

Canberra has forecast uranium exports to rise from around 10,000 tonnes a year to 14,000 tonnes in 2014, worth around A$1.7 billion.

Sunday's party vote was a victory for Gillard, but exposed deep divisions within the government over nuclear energy, with Transport Minister Anthony Albanese leading opposition to any sales to India or expansion of exports.

Albanese said since Japan's Fukushima nuclear disaster in March, most nations, including Germany, Switzerland and Italy, were winding back their commitment to nuclear energy.

"Under these circumstances, it is absurd that we should be expanding ours," Albanese told the conference.

Former anti-nuclear campaigner and rock singer Peter Garrett, whose band Midnight Oil railed against nuclear energy, said Labor needed to honour its support for the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

"Labor has a great disarmament tradition," Garrett, who is now Australia's Schools Education Minister, told the conference.

"Where is our vision here? Where is our commitment to a nuclear free future?"


Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India | Reuters

late but at the end australia shown some maturity.
 
.
It was'nt Indian pressure. It was just the intrinsic contradictions in the policy which had reduced it to plain old BS.

Pretty much yes.

And Australia (and Australian industry) needs the money, don't it?

Nope, not really. The deal is only worth about 11 billion. Small drop in the ocean compared to the money industry is making from China.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom