TruthTheOnlyDefense
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
- Messages
- 3,056
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
IMMIGRATION built Australia, but planning for our future is smart, not racist, writes Peta Credlin. And it’s a conversation our national leaders need to have.
A COUPLE of days ago, I spent the morning out in Bennelong because I don’t think you can ever judge a campaign unless you get out and talk to real people.
The issue of population has always been a political concern I’ve watched closely but even I was surprised by how potent this issue was locally: overcrowded streets, busy roads, nowhere to park, overdevelopment, unaffordable housing, cramped schools and too many high-rises.
Time and again this is what was raised with me and it’s all code for a level of population growth that ordinary people feel is out of step with their local community.
Now there are a number of factors that contribute to population. There’s the rate we replace ourselves — new births versus deaths, and there’s the number of people moving here each year, and the number who leave.
For many years, as a nation, we have accepted immigrants from around the world — it’s part of what makes Australia unique. If you’re not the child of an indigenous Australian, you’re the child of an immigrant. I am — my family came here in the mid 1800s — and I support continued immigration.
Karen Kore from Papua New Guinea, Dindin Khaing from Myanmar, Daniella Kerrigan from the Philippines and Saowawe Tsongkam from Thailand at a multicultural festival. Few would argue Australia is built on immigrants. (Pic: Anna Rogers)Source:News Corp Australia
But that’s not the issue.
“Should we keep taking immigrants?” is not the question.
Instead it’s “how many immigrants do we take”?
When working out an optimum population size for Australia, we should take into consideration matters such as our job market, housing supply, infrastructure and scarce resources like water.
I know I speak for many people when I say this is the conversation they want to see their leaders having — indeed their nation having — rather than being shouted down, as racists or worse.
Right now, as Australians, we’re not replacing ourselves — our fertility rate is only 1.79 births per woman — so our population increases are coming from immigration. How big we want our population in the future is determined by how many people we take from overseas every year.
Over the past 40 years, our net migration intake (calculated by number of people arriving to stay, less the number who permanently depart) has varied from around 68,000 per year, to as high as 315,700 under Kevin Rudd in 2008. In ABS data out last week, in the 12 months to July this year, Australia’s net migration intake was 245,400.
Nyembezi Zulu, Mavuto Zulu, Shanice Zulu, Shanelle Mbalenhle Zulu, and Monica Zulu became Australian citizens in Alice Springs in September. (Pic: Emma Murray)Source:News Corp Australia
One of the highest numbers in years, this increase is up 27 per cent from the previous year and took Australia’s total population to 24.6 million. Victorians are being hit hardest by population pressures with increases well above the national average. Indeed, with over 144,000 new residents, Victoria’s growth was the highest in the nation and almost seven times what was recorded in WA.
All of this in a state where Premier Dan Andrews charged the Victorian taxpayers $1 billion not to build a road at a time when new infrastructure is desperately needed.
Isn’t it about time we had a national conversation about how big we want our population in the future, with an eye to the standard of living we want all Australians to enjoy, and put in place immigration levels to deliver it — rather than pretending this issue doesn’t exist?
From what I know of Canberra, it’s treasurers who want to see higher and higher growth forecasts in the Budget, and bureaucrats who fight for increased levels of immigration, because it’s a lazy way to pump up the books.
I recall plenty of battles in the Abbott government where the then PM wanted numbers brought down to better manage population increases in our big cities because we can say new arrivals should move to regional areas, but no government has ever been able to make that policy work and more and more, they live in our biggest cities.
In Monday’s Mid Year economic update, I’ll be watching this issue closely.
If nothing else, I think we need to take a pause in Australia’s immigration intake, so we can settle the population here now, into affordable housing and secure jobs, and let the infrastructure that’s being built, catch-up.
Planning for Australia’s future is smart, it isn’t racist and it’s the national conversation we want our political leaders to lead.
Originally published as It’s not racist to be worried about immigration
http://www.news.com.au/news/its-not...n/news-story/c5831cad88603b56cbd6faaab6e55bdc
A COUPLE of days ago, I spent the morning out in Bennelong because I don’t think you can ever judge a campaign unless you get out and talk to real people.
The issue of population has always been a political concern I’ve watched closely but even I was surprised by how potent this issue was locally: overcrowded streets, busy roads, nowhere to park, overdevelopment, unaffordable housing, cramped schools and too many high-rises.
Time and again this is what was raised with me and it’s all code for a level of population growth that ordinary people feel is out of step with their local community.
Now there are a number of factors that contribute to population. There’s the rate we replace ourselves — new births versus deaths, and there’s the number of people moving here each year, and the number who leave.
For many years, as a nation, we have accepted immigrants from around the world — it’s part of what makes Australia unique. If you’re not the child of an indigenous Australian, you’re the child of an immigrant. I am — my family came here in the mid 1800s — and I support continued immigration.
Karen Kore from Papua New Guinea, Dindin Khaing from Myanmar, Daniella Kerrigan from the Philippines and Saowawe Tsongkam from Thailand at a multicultural festival. Few would argue Australia is built on immigrants. (Pic: Anna Rogers)Source:News Corp Australia
But that’s not the issue.
“Should we keep taking immigrants?” is not the question.
Instead it’s “how many immigrants do we take”?
When working out an optimum population size for Australia, we should take into consideration matters such as our job market, housing supply, infrastructure and scarce resources like water.
I know I speak for many people when I say this is the conversation they want to see their leaders having — indeed their nation having — rather than being shouted down, as racists or worse.
Right now, as Australians, we’re not replacing ourselves — our fertility rate is only 1.79 births per woman — so our population increases are coming from immigration. How big we want our population in the future is determined by how many people we take from overseas every year.
Over the past 40 years, our net migration intake (calculated by number of people arriving to stay, less the number who permanently depart) has varied from around 68,000 per year, to as high as 315,700 under Kevin Rudd in 2008. In ABS data out last week, in the 12 months to July this year, Australia’s net migration intake was 245,400.
Nyembezi Zulu, Mavuto Zulu, Shanice Zulu, Shanelle Mbalenhle Zulu, and Monica Zulu became Australian citizens in Alice Springs in September. (Pic: Emma Murray)Source:News Corp Australia
One of the highest numbers in years, this increase is up 27 per cent from the previous year and took Australia’s total population to 24.6 million. Victorians are being hit hardest by population pressures with increases well above the national average. Indeed, with over 144,000 new residents, Victoria’s growth was the highest in the nation and almost seven times what was recorded in WA.
All of this in a state where Premier Dan Andrews charged the Victorian taxpayers $1 billion not to build a road at a time when new infrastructure is desperately needed.
Isn’t it about time we had a national conversation about how big we want our population in the future, with an eye to the standard of living we want all Australians to enjoy, and put in place immigration levels to deliver it — rather than pretending this issue doesn’t exist?
From what I know of Canberra, it’s treasurers who want to see higher and higher growth forecasts in the Budget, and bureaucrats who fight for increased levels of immigration, because it’s a lazy way to pump up the books.
I recall plenty of battles in the Abbott government where the then PM wanted numbers brought down to better manage population increases in our big cities because we can say new arrivals should move to regional areas, but no government has ever been able to make that policy work and more and more, they live in our biggest cities.
In Monday’s Mid Year economic update, I’ll be watching this issue closely.
If nothing else, I think we need to take a pause in Australia’s immigration intake, so we can settle the population here now, into affordable housing and secure jobs, and let the infrastructure that’s being built, catch-up.
Planning for Australia’s future is smart, it isn’t racist and it’s the national conversation we want our political leaders to lead.
Originally published as It’s not racist to be worried about immigration
http://www.news.com.au/news/its-not...n/news-story/c5831cad88603b56cbd6faaab6e55bdc