What's new

Attempted IAF incursion - A Failed operation

Should we retaliate?

  • Yes

    Votes: 154 87.5%
  • No

    Votes: 22 12.5%

  • Total voters
    176
.
This time this incrusion occur when we are already prepared and they come deep inside our land which is not ordinary incrusion and cannot be justified it is not a sudden attack they have warned openly about this so it is failure of army

"Deep" inside our territory???

You must not be familiar with LoC, terrain, air operations etc. IAF can come at 40K feet inside Pak just 30km, drop their tanks, and go back---and those tanks will fall hundreds km away due to height. Doesn't mean IAF came hundreds km inside.

This is not that out of ordinary.
 
. .
Again, such incursions happen throughout the year hundreds of times. Nobody cares :lol:

There was even report from IAF about PAF's incursions into indian air space and the number was like in hundreds. IAF does the same. Turks and Greeks do the same.

And indians can make their mythical claims with dramatic music. Who cares? We will continue to laugh at those defeated, inferiority-complex stricken peoples. They can only win in their movies and medias....and I for one am fine with it :)

Hi,

Those incursions have nothing to do with what happened today---.

This was purely a surgical strike and it hit its target successfully---.

The Paf should show its retaliation with its actions---.
 
.
50 Miles into PAK territory is not an incursion , its a statement. Your DG ISPR itself is confirming it. Anyways, spining as always.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Show me where DG ISPR said IAF came 80km inside Pakistan??

Read my last post above before embarrassing yourself

"Deep" inside our territory???

You must not be familiar with LoC, terrain, air operations etc. IAF can come at 40,000 feet inside Pak just 30km, drop their tanks at high speeds, and go back---and those fuel tanks will fall hundreds km away due to height. Doesn't mean IAF planes came hundreds km inside.

This is not that out of ordinary that much.
 
.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Dumbass, they didn't bomb shit. They dropped their payload. Do you not even know basic air force terminology.

Here's a trick question: If they indeed bomb inside Pakistan, what 'specific target' they bombed? :lol: You don't 'release bombs' randomly...

IAF released their payload (fuel) so they can speed away from intercepting aircrafts. Literally, standard operating procedure that happens throughout the year on the border.

PAF does the same thing from time to time
Ok man...
 
.
Hi,

Those incursions have nothing to do with what happened today---.

This was purely a surgical strike and it hit its target successfully---.

The Paf should show its retaliation with its actions---.

So enlighten me, what "target" did IAF hit with bombs? :rofl:
 
.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Show me where DG ISPR said IAF came 80km inside Pakistan??

Read my last post above before embarrassing yourself

Carry on - AUZ ; Anyways you know what we are talking about , but if you have to manage opinion its fine. How far is Balakot in KPK ?
 
.
Hi,

Those incursions have nothing to do with what happened today---.

This was purely a surgical strike and it hit its target successfully---.

The Paf should show its retaliation with its actions---.
Its not a surgicsl strike, its bombardment . Report of using 12 aircraft in this mission.
 
.
Stop being an idiot.

It was air space violation which is extremely standard procedure. PAF violates indian airspace hundreds of times throughout the year. IAF does the same.

What "objective" IAF achieved that was mentionable? Even Mexican air force sometimes end up violating US airspace :lol:

Did IAF bombed any military installations? No. They most likely released their payload (fuel) upon interception and ran back quickly before confrontation become 'hot'.....

Standard Procedure again.
What silly you are talking about? Hundreds of violations every year from both side????
Few days back DG ISPR was proudly presenting shotdown indian drones.
Now IAF entered, dropped load, and escaped?
 
.
What silly you are talking about? Hundreds of violations every year from both side????
Few days back DG ISPR was proudly presenting shotdown indian drones.
Now IAF entered, dropped load, and escaped?
Auz is desperately clutching Straws. :) . DGISPR has confirmed it and as usual spun it.
 
. .
Carry on - AUZ ; Anyways you know what we are talking about , but if you have to manage opinion its fine. How far is Balakot in KPK ?

Go to GD ISPR page: Pakistan Army already published the pictures showing indian payload in tatters in middle of forests....that indian air crafts dropped while retreating hastily :lol:

What silly you are talking about? Hundreds of violations every year from both side????
Few days back DG ISPR was proudly presenting shotdown indian drones.
Now IAF entered, dropped load, and escaped?

Yes. tens upon tens of airspace violations. Google it. Its an IAF official stating it.

Such violations are nothing abnormal.

Its not a surgicsl strike, its bombardment . Report of using 12 aircraft in this mission.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
Go to GD ISPR page: Pakistan Army already published the pictures showing indian payload in tatters in middle of forests....that indian air crafts dropped while retreating hastily :lol:



Yes. tens upon tens of airspace violations. Google it. Its an IAF official stating it.

Such violations are nothing abnormal.



:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Auz PAF has been caught pants down. Balakot strike , 50 miles from LOC.. this is not incursion, this is we are here, do what you can do ?
How many emojis do you use AUz to feel comfortable ?
 
.
if entering 50km in Pakistani border is "nothing abnormal", Indians must do it regularly....
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom