Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have a realy big mouth and you talk a lot crapy stuff...I live in the same country where you live, does that mean I start bashing my motherland...did britain managed to stop the 7/7 bombings???
My answer is they didnt, does that mean they are incompetent. In future you better watch your mouth.
I would like to describe something that cements my suspicion on INDIAN RAW behind this incident. Here are a few differences between the Mumbai attackers and the Lahore attackers despite the obvious similarities.
1. The Mumbai attackers were clearly on a suicide mission and motivated; the Lahore attackers seemed more like paid assassins who later left all of their weapons on site and disappeared into the crowd.
2. The Lahore attackers were mostly on the back foot unlike the Mumbai attackers who were on a search & destroy front foot mission.
3. The Lahore attackers only fired upon the security staff and the players bus and unlike the Mumbai attackers they did not deliberately harmed the civilians around the busy intersection of Liberty.
4. Unlike Mumbai attackers; No attempt was made to take any hostages (civil or otherwise) or to present any demands or identify the organization behind the incident.
4. The obvious beneficiary of this attack is surely India who gains financially by having more matches of the World Cup 2011 being now played in India after Pakistan being out of it, and politically because of having further degraded the image of Pakistan internationally and at the same time passing a message on to Sri Lanka, to not to be against Indian interests.
Frankly, if Indian involvement is found in this attack our Government should not pussy-foot around in diplomacy and perhaps do a limited surgical air strike in India on the HQ of the likely perpetrators of this incident...........RAW! I am sure the Indians will have no objections!
nice analysis. One point may be that India is going to have to face the consequences, particularly if the ISI is convinced she was involved. In that case, India wouldn't be in a situation to hold the world cup either. which leaves Bangladesh and Sri Lanka..
4. The obvious beneficiary of this attack is surely India who gains financially by having more matches of the World Cup 2011 being now played in India after Pakistan being out of it, and politically because of having further degraded the image of Pakistan internationally and at the same time passing a message on to Sri Lanka, to not to be against Indian interests.