Maybe your education should have taught you that things that are obvious have certain tells.
None of which indicate that Kashmir belongs to Kashmiris.
Every indicator points to Kashmir belonging to India. Whether its legal (Instrument of accession), political (no country recognized Kashmir as belonging to Kashmiris or Independent) or military (this one should be, how do you call it "obvious" lol)
This is the most stupidest comment I have ever read in my entire life. Kashmir belongs to Kashmiris. Every province or state belongs to its people. Get a grip for Christ sake and keep the BJP IT Cell tripe to a minimum. You're just making a complete moron of yourself.
Please explain then why does all 192 UN members regard Kashmir as disputed territory still? And when I mean all, I do mean all...even India officially accepts that J&K is disputed territory. Have you ever opened up your own constitution? The Jammu & Kashmir High Court did, and guess what.
Article 370 is permanent, rules J&K High Court
http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...manent-rules-jk-high-court/article7749839.ece
This is the Jammu & Kashmir High Court saying this, not me...so don't cry too hard.
Like I said, please come back and make these claims when the obvious starts to show up in Kashmir.
What obvious? That 14 August is celebrated in Kashmir and 15 August everyone strikes as Black Day? That's pretty obvious to me. Or that they celebrate when Pakistan wins a cricket match? Come on, who are you fooling?
If the Kashmiris stop acting like terrorists and vandals, there will be no tyranny.
"If the Indians stop acting like terrorist and vandals, there will be no tyranny" - British occupiers, 1857
Do you see how stupid you sound? So when it fits your narrative, it's okay to be a terrorist when fighting the British. But when Kashmiris fight you, then it's a crime? So then Bhagat Singh must be a terrorist in your eyes.
We don't enjoy violence or suppression.
Please spare us. The Vedas have already told us not to trust you Dasyus. You're born and bred troublemakers. Long before Islam showed up, your Shunga yobs in Bihar religiously cleansed Buddhists from the Ganga and forced them to flee into Bhutan, Nepal and Kashmir and then later Punjab. It was one of the reasons why the Indo-Greek Kingdom was established...to protect the Buddhists from you Brahmin Shunga yobs. Violence and Gangladesh/Dasyuvarta/North India go together like a horse and carriage.
It isn't even about religion. It's just your filthy culture...even North Indian Muslims behave like mongrels. Hindu or Muslim...you're both a piece of Ganga trash.
But we also don't like anyone trying to break our country apart.
British India wasn't a country, it was a colony of Britain.
We learned this the hard way in 1947. Never again!
Well, I'd start sending notices to those promoting Dravida Nadu and Khalistan movements in India these days, or you'll be in for a rude awakening.
if the Kashmiris are peaceful, we will be forced to be peaceful. Negotiations do not happen from the barrel of a gun, especially when the one Kashmiris are facing show up with bigger guns and will power. Its very simple. Its action and reaction. We are simply reacting.
Not your decision to make. Kashmiris were promised the right to self determination and India has denied it. So, violence will be the only answer. Don't like it, tough luck. Kashmiris are a proud people and they'll keep fighting. Your soldiers on the other hand seem more interested in making YouTube videos about not having enough to eat.
And Che and Bhagat would still call for their right to freedom. Simple as that.
Well, Maqbool Bhat and Afzal Guru are called for freedom too. You killed both of them.
Nothing indicates that Kashmir would be close to their heart and the calls for freedom from Baluchistan not. Things don't just happen because you say so. lets be clear on that.
The ideology of Che and Bhagat would put both Kashmir and Baluchistan on an equal footing for freedom.
Balochistan is a region shared between Pakistan and Iran. It's regarded as legal provinces of both countries, Balochistan in Pakistan and Beluchistan o Sistan in Iran. What are you even talking about?
Whether you consider BLA/BRA terrorists OR us considering the Kashmiris terrorists is irrelevant.
BLA/BRA have nothing to do with this. If you view Kashmiris as terrorists, then Bhagat Singh should technically be a terrorist too.
Thanks to Pakistan Army and UK government
Say: Thank you Britain
Britain can go F themselves. War mongering twats ruining the entire subcontinent. And to this day they haven't apologized for the mess they made.