What's new

Assassination of Ziaur Rahman

monitor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
8,570
Reaction score
7
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Lieutenant General Ziaur Rahman, Bir Uttam, (January 19, 1936 – May 30, 1981) was a hero of the Bangladesh Liberation War, a retired three star Lieutenant General of the Bangladesh Army and a statesman.He was the 7th President of Bangladesh from 1977 until 1981. He founded the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), one of the two largest political parties in the country. He is popularly known as Shaheed President Zia, meaning martyred Zia, in reference to his assassination in 1981.

dear fellow member lets discuss who are the force behind the killing of Shahid ziur rahman and the beneficiary of his sudden demise in the 75th aniversary of his birthday .
 
One thing has to be noted. When Sheikh Mujib died, not even a single man on the street protested. Matter of fact, the next day, the killers were regarded has heroes, but when Zia died, the entire country cried. He's janaza had the highest attendance ever recorded in the country.
and he also made a mistake, which BNP is facing now. He let the Sheikh Hasina in the country, and he let her join politics, which he could have easily prevented. and the ungrateful prime minister rather trash talks him in the parliament.
And ershad seemed to have benefited when he was killled.
 
My firm believe is that Ershad is the person behind who done every thing after e reading the books by one major general(ret) who later became the advisor to caretaker govt. according to that book Ershad was totally normal when the news of zia,s death came .he simply in cold mind handle every thing.
 
One thing has to be noted. When Sheikh Mujib died, not even a single man on the street protested. Matter of fact, the next day, the killers were regarded has heroes,
Why was that? People regretted his actions?
 
nah,although he was a leader of great speeches Mujeeb wasn't able to run country at all. The economic condition of the country went so bad that people died on the street. Another reason being when he died everyone just became shocked at the sudden fluctuation in power. Those who didn like him didn know what t do and those who were his followers couldn believe it.

Anyways its quite frustrating to know that both of this leaders were assassinated and I bet if anyone of this leader lived till today it would have been a spectacular Bangladesh. Back then Zia initiated the SAARC and now theres no one strong enough to raise the voice for regional cooperation(Al is just acting like a wannabe). Does anyone know that once upon a time Zia was famous in saudi arab because of the trees he sent there?
 
Last edited:
Love Ziaur Rahman - if his idiots sons and previously corrupted party leaders can follow Ziaur Rahman's ideology, speed and honesty then I would like to be a BNP supporter.
 
Foreign policy under Ziaur Rahman

When Ziaur Rahman took over on April 21, 1977, he not only consolidated his power base but also made foreign policy dynamic.

Initially, he had made efforts in strengthening relations with other Muslim countries, and to foster good relations with countries of the west. Secondly, he planned to foster fraternal and cordial relations with neighbouring countries.

Until August 1975, Bangladesh did not have recognition from Saudi Arabia and China.

President Ziaur Rahman promoted rapid relations with Saudi Arabia and China. Saudi Arabia did not support the liberation movement because of Pakistan's propaganda against the movement.

The government of Bangabandhu had dispatched two stalwart diplomats: Iqbal Athar, Pakistan's Ambassador to Italy who defected to Bangladesh, and Ataur Rahman, who had been Pakistan's Ambassador to Sudan, to remove the misgivings that existed in the minds of some Arab countries about Bangladesh. Many Arab countries came forward to recognise Bangladesh, excepting the oil rich countries -- Iran, Libya and Saudi Arabia. These countries did not go along with the dismemberment of the Muslim country, Pakistan, and the birth of the new nation with the backing of a non-Muslim country, India.

Ziaur Rahman initiated efforts to develop ties with China in January 1977 when he paid a visit to that country as chief martial law administrator. Just as the Zia administration was bent upon developing close relations with China, the Soviet Union thought it appropriate to establish contact with the new regime in Bangladesh and to persuade it not to become too close to China at the cost of an old trusted friend who had accorded all-out support to the cause of Bangladesh during the war of liberation.

On the other hand, the exchange of high level visits contributed to the promotion of understanding, cooperation and friendship between Bangladesh and China. The visit of the Chinese Vice-Premier Li Shien Nien accompanied by the Foreign Minister Huang Hua to Bangladesh in March, 1978 was interpreted as a significant development in the bilateral relations between the two countries. Although Sino-Bangladesh bilateral relations developed reasonably well within the span of three years, the Chinese did not apparently accept the friendly attitude shown by Bangladesh towards Vietnam when its vice-premier was received in Dhaka in December, 1978.

The Vietnamese vice-premier was received at a time when relations between China and Vietnam had become tense following a Chinese retaliatory attack against Vietnam after the Vietnamese invasion of Kampuchea.

A host of historical, geographical, politico-cultural and socio-economic factors and individual whims have played a significant role in shaping the relations between Bangladesh and India. Ziaur Rahman began his journey to India with a note of apathy in his attitude in view of the growing anti-India sentiments in Bangladesh, but he was cautiously moving on a tightrope to avoid confrontation, keeping in mind the geo-political compulsion. The relations with India improved when Janata Dal, headed by Morarji Desai, was voted to power in India in March, 1977. The Ziaur Rahman government received full cooperation from the Desai government to contain insurgency against Bangladesh.

On the Farakka Barrage issue, Morarji Desai understood Bangladesh's problem. Following a series of meetings at expert and ministerial levels a five year agreement, containing a guarantee clause on the sharing of the Ganges waters at Farakka, was signed in December, 1977. During the state visit of Morarji Desai to Bangladesh from April 16-18, 1979, it was agreed to set up a joint river commission on allocation of irrigation water from the Ganges for Bangladesh.

Viewed in the context of the vast potential that exists in the South Asia region, which is, by and large, a mosaic of multi-cultural, multi-lingual and multi-religious patterns, President Ziaur Rahman discussed the idea of regional cooperation in the course of visits to various capitals of the region during the period 1977 to 1979. Encouraged by the initial response Ziaur Rahman proposed that avenues should be explored to establish some institutional framework for regional cooperation. The first meeting of the foreign secretaries, which was held in Colombo from April 21-23, was considered as an important milestone in establishing Saarc in 1985. Bangladesh Foreign Secretary SAMS Kibria described the occasion as one of historic significance.

Bangladesh's commitment to the principles and objectives of the Organisation of Islamic Conference laid a basis for development of further relations with Muslim countries. Credit, however, goes to Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman who took the initiative to normalise relations with Muslim countries by attending the second Islamic summit in Islamabad in 1974. Without recognition by Pakistan, Bangladesh could not attend the conference, and to bring about the reconciliation a hectic diplomatic maneuver preceded the conference. A seven-member delegation headed by the secretary general of OIC visited Dhaka, and Bangabandhu accepted the invitation.

Although Pakistan's recognition came because of pressure from Muslim countries, relations did not improve during Bangabandhu's government. During Zia's, time relations had improved, but major issues such as apportionment of assets and liabilities and repatriation of stranded Pakistanis (non-Bengalis) have not been resolved till today. Apart from strengthening relations with Muslim countries, Ziaur Rahman's role in stopping the fratricidal war between Iraq and Iran and bringing about reconciliation between these two countries was deeply appreciated by OIC.

The policy pursued by the Zia government was to foster good relations with western countries. The western countries also showed increasing interest in developing relations with Bangladesh primarily because of Zia's policy to distance Bangladesh from the pro-Soviet bloc and to introduce multi-party democracy. Bangladesh has had excellent relations with the United States and Great Britain. Zia had established personal rapport with Jimmy Carter, President of the United States. The visit of British Prime Minister James Callaghan in 1978 added another feather to the diplomatic success.

In the international forum, Bangladesh earned prestige and honour. The election of Bangladesh to the Security Council as a non-permanent member in 1978, defeating Japan, was quite a significant achievement in the conduct of foreign relations. Bangladesh Foreign Secretary SAMS Kibria's appointment as Executive Secretary at ESCAP(Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific) in Bangkok and Arshad Uz-Zaman as Assistant Secretary General in OIC were success stories, too.

I would like to conclude this article by quoting Professor Muhammad Shamsul Haq, foreign minister in Ziaur Rahman's cabinet: "Bangladesh is a small country and wants to have good relations with all -- big or small. We do not believe in any bloc. We do not like it. Bangladesh believes in equal sovereign rights of all nations and non-interference in other's internal affairs."

Mohammad Amjad Hossain, a former diplomat, writes from Virginia.
 
nah,although he was a leader of great speeches Mujeeb wasn't able to run country at all. The economic condition of the country went so bad that people died on the street. Another reason being when he died everyone just became shocked at the sudden fluctuation in power. Those who didn like him didn know what t do and those who were his followers couldn believe it.

Anyways its quite frustrating to know that both of this leaders were assassinated and I bet if anyone of this leader lived till today it would have been a spectacular Bangladesh. Back then Zia initiated the SAARC and now theres no one strong enough raise the vice for regional cooperation(Al is just acting like a wannabe). Does anyone know that once upon a time Zia was famous in saudi arab because of the trees he sent there?

Interesting, but i would beg to differ you that if Mujib was living today, the country's situation would have been much much worse. He has created the BAKSAL and oppressed many of his oppositions. There is offcourse more atrocities he has commited. Yes, he's contribution was needed for an independent country, but he's rule took us much much behind.
And the phrase you hear "gach lagan poribesh bachan" was that of Ziaur Rahman. The creation of EPZ, was also of Ziaur Rahman. Not to mention the idea of SAARC. This are only the few achievements. Not to mention, he was known for his extremely strong character and high personality. He's the best speaker and the best representative of Bangladesh has witnessed so far.
 
Why was that? People regretted his actions?

Bangladeshis in this forum live in a world of their own, Mujib is revered by many if not all. Read this.

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Listeners name 'greatest Bengali'

By Sabir Mustafa
BBC Bengali editor


Rahman: Regarded by many as the founder of Bangladesh
Listeners of the BBC's Bengali service have voted Bangladesh's first president, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the "Greatest Bengali of All Time".
Sheikh Mujibur, assassinated in 1975, easily beat Nobel prize-winning poet and playwright Rabindranath Tagore.

Another Nobel laureate, economist Amartya Sen, was the only living person in the top 20 at number 14.

He was one place behind Satyajit Ray, director of classic films such as Pather Panchali and the Chess Players.

Sheikh Mujib, popularly known as Bangabandhu or Friend of Bengal, is credited by many with leading Bangladesh to independence from Pakistan in 1971.

The former Bangladeshi president was one of numerous politicians to figure prominently in the poll, including General Ziaur Rahman, the assassinated husband of the present prime minister.

Tagore is revered widely - regarded by many as the Bengali Shakespeare - and is the composer of both the Indian and Bangladeshi national anthems.

Tagore is regarded as the Bengali Shakespeare
In the survey, popular fascination with poetry and rebellion was reflected in the listeners' choice for number three - Kazi Nazrul Islam, a firebrand poet who was jailed by the British for writing subversive verses.

Still revered by Bengalis as the Rebel Poet, Nazrul Islam also composed hundreds of love songs and religious chants.

The radio survey was conducted over February and March, when listeners were asked to nominate their five greatest Bengalis.

The Bengali Service announced the names through a countdown over 20 days, starting on 26 March - Bangladesh's independence day - and ending on Bengali New Year's Day on 14 April.

The survey put only one woman in the Top 20, Rokeya Sakhawaat Hossain, at number six.

Reformers and revolutionaries

Hossain, popularly referred to as Begum Rokeya, risked social wrath and isolation at the turn of the 20th century, by pioneering education for Muslim women in Bengal.

The top 20 was peppered with names of reformers and revolutionaries - Subhash Chandra Bose, who led an abortive armed rebellion against British rule during World War II, came in at number five.

Social reformer and educationist Ishwar Chandra Viddyasagar, who sought to break down caste barriers in Hindu society, came in at number eight.

A 19th Century rebel against British rule, Mir Nisar Ali Titumeer, came in at number 11.

But not everyone on the list is a poet or a politician, with listeners voting scientist Jagadish Chandra Basu into number seven. He is credited with ground-breaking work on the life cycle of plants.

The BBC's Bengali service has nearly 12 million listeners in Bangladesh and eastern India, home to some 250 million Bengali-speakers.

The survey produced well over 100 names, and the top 20 was compiled on points awarded according to listeners' order of preference.

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Listeners name 'greatest Bengali'

Considering most West Bengalis rated below, it seems most votes were of Bangladeshis.
 
Abir, I don't think anyone is denying the contribution of Sheikh Mujib. But where were all the protesters when he was killed? I understand how you think we are being biased with our opinions, but one party rule and creation of BAKSAL was a fact. He has killed oppositions leaders like Siraj Sikdar, and bragged about it in the parliaments.
 
Abir, I don't think anyone is denying the contribution of Sheikh Mujib. But where were all the protesters when he was killed? I understand how you think we are being biased with our opinions, but one party rule and creation of BAKSAL was a fact. He has killed oppositions leaders like Siraj Sikdar, and bragged about it in the parliaments.

I was just pointing out it would be wrong to say Mujib is hated in Bangladesh. Yes, he had his share of faults as well, I know of them.
 
nah,although he was a leader of great speeches Mujeeb wasn't able to run country at all. The economic condition of the country went so bad that people died on the street. Another reason being when he died everyone just became shocked at the sudden fluctuation in power. Those who didn like him didn know what t do and those who were his followers couldn believe it.

Anyways its quite frustrating to know that both of this leaders were assassinated and I bet if anyone of this leader lived till today it would have been a spectacular Bangladesh. Back then Zia initiated the SAARC and now theres no one strong enough raise the vice for regional cooperation(Al is just acting like a wannabe). Does anyone know that once upon a time Zia was famous in saudi arab because of the trees he sent there?

You are contradicting your own claim and assumption. Zia-ur-Rehman would not have emerge if Mujib succeeded. It was his miserable failure to lead, vision, unity and anti Islamic activity that sent him to unknown destination. He was good at big talk(chapa baaz) like all Awami leaders.

What Zia-ur-Rehman did in 4 years is unequal to entire history of BD.
Will you differ?
 
what caused the Hasina - Rehman rivalry which is still existing even today?

i assume it's just power/influence?
 
from one of the above posts, i get the impression that anti-indian sentiments were rising by around 1977, just 6 years after your independence

please explain this phenomenon
 
Interesting, but i would beg to differ you that if Mujib was living today, the country's situation would have been much much worse. He has created the BAKSAL and oppressed many of his oppositions. There is offcourse more atrocities he has commited. Yes, he's contribution was needed for an independent country, but he's rule took us much much behind.
And the phrase you hear "gach lagan poribesh bachan" was that of Ziaur Rahman. The creation of EPZ, was also of Ziaur Rahman. Not to mention the idea of SAARC. This are only the few achievements. Not to mention, he was known for his extremely strong character and high personality. He's the best speaker and the best representative of Bangladesh has witnessed so far.

And I would beg to differ from you here. It's easy to see everything in terms of black & white. Mujib and Zia had different approaches in running the country. Mujib was bringing changes to BD's india-centric foreign policy later in his term. He initiated forging good relations with Muslim countries to help BD's economy, as india apparently was not interested. He did create BAKSAL to solidify his hold in power. Nothing wrong with that. BD needed a strong dictator at that point in time. Maybe things would have went the "Chinese way", with a one-party rule and a socialist state.

Just because Zia was a better leader does not mean Mujib was evil. Again, try not to use the black and white approach.
 

Back
Top Bottom