What's new

Assad Can Stay, for Now: Kerry Accepts Russian Stance

Hiptullha

BANNED
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
4,706
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Assad Can Stay, for Now: Kerry Accepts Russian Stance
  • By MATTHEW LEE AND BRADLEY KLAPPER, ASSOCIATED PRESS
MOSCOW — Dec 15, 2015, 6:01 PM ET
WireAP_9d36ecbc010d4a399912b22647bf126b_16x9_1600.jpg
The Associated Press
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, shakes hands with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015. Kerry arrived in Moscow to hold talks with Lavrov and Russian President Vladimir Putin. (AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev)more +


U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday accepted Russia's long-standing demand that President Bashar Assad's future be determined by his own people, as Washington and Moscow edged toward putting aside years of disagreement over how to end Syria's civil war.

"The United States and our partners are not seeking so-called regime change," Kerry told reporters in the Russian capital after meeting President Vladimir Putin. A major international conference on Syria would take place later this week in New York, Kerry announced.

Kerry reiterated the U.S. position that Assad, accused by the West of massive human rights violations and chemical weapons attacks, won't be able to steer Syria out of more than four years of conflict.

But after a day of discussions with Assad's key international backer, Kerry said the focus now is "not on our differences about what can or cannot be done immediately about Assad." Rather, it is on facilitating a peace process in which "Syrians will be making decisions for the future of Syria."

Kerry's declarations crystallized the evolution in U.S. policy on Assad over the last several months, as the Islamic State group's growing influence in the Middle East has taken priority.

President Barack Obama first called on Assad to leave power in the summer of 2011, with "Assad must go" being a consistent rallying cry. Later, American officials allowed that he wouldn't have to resign on "Day One" of a transition. Now, no one can say when Assad might step down.

Russia, by contrast, has remained consistent in its view that no foreign government could demand Assad's departure and that Syrians would have to negotiate matters of leadership among themselves. Since late September, it has been bombing terrorist and rebel targets in Syria as part of what the West says is an effort to prop up Assad's government.

"No one should be forced to choose between a dictator and being plagued by terrorists," Kerry said. However, he described the Syrian opposition's demand that Assad must leave as soon as peace talks begin as a "nonstarting position, obviously."

Earlier Tuesday in the Kremlin, Putin noted several "outstanding issues" between Russia and its former Cold War foe. Beyond Assad, these include which rebel groups in Syria should be allowed to participate in the transition process and which should be deemed terrorists, and like the Islamic State group and al-Qaida, combatted by all.

Jordan is working on finalizing the list of terrorist vs. legitimate opposition forces. Representatives of Syria's opposition themselves hope this week to finalize their negotiating team for talks with Assad's government. The U.S., Russia and others hope those talks will begin early next year.

Appearing beside Kerry, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov hailed what he described as a "big negotiating day," saying the sides advanced efforts to define what a Syrian transition process might look like.

The two countries also have split on Ukraine since Russia's annexation of the Crimea region last year and its ongoing, though diminished, support for separatist rebels in the east of the country. The U.S. has pressed severe economic sanctions against Russia in response and has insisted that Moscow's actions have left it isolated.

That wasn't the case on Tuesday.

"We don't seek to isolate Russia as a matter of policy, no," Kerry said. The sooner Russia implements a February cease-fire that calls for withdrawal of Russian forces and materiel and a release of all prisoners, he said, the sooner that "sanctions can be rolled back."

The world is better off when Russia and the U.S. work together, he added, calling Obama and Putin's current cooperation a "sign of maturity."

"There is no policy of the United States, per se, to isolate Russia," Kerry stressed.

———
 
It is called FRIEND SHIP not trade not weak or poor country not a Muslim country but friend and only friend country, partner ship and collation. A friend in need and a friend in deed. It is NATURE. USA and its watchmen turn back.
 
Is anybody surprised? I said this was official US/regional position for the past three years. It's because US doesn't want religious people in power. Especially religious Sunni's who are self determined and consider interests of their people more important than foreign interests.
 
Unlimited lanat on both... after killed hundred thousands of innocents .. they agreed not to kill further... we already did enough destruction.. now we will start new game on some other place....
 
Now that would be called 'Laut ke buddhu ghar ko aaye'
 
Now wonder why Saudi announce overnight alliance...........interesting.
 
2016 can't come soon enough.

This buffoon Obama needs to go, his foreign policy has been an unmitigated disaster.
 
while this is a welcome decision and the syrian government, armed forces and people would heartily applaud this, it seems that usa government has seen that russia defends syria from nato and usa government has also seen that the patriotic syrian people have defended syria for five complete years.

and all members and readers should ignore the laughable assertions of hazzy in post# 3.

however, the freedom-loving peoples of the world should initiate and sustain a campaign to indict in the "international criminal court" the main war-criminals and genociders responsible for the libya and syria wars - obomba, sarkozy, cameron, hollande, merkel, erdogan, whichever saudi king is at hand and hamad al-thani.

just like bush jr and bliar have been declared war-criminals in absentia for the iraq war, the above criminals/psychopaths must be declared.

every progressive state and movement should help the progressives in usa, britain, france, germany, italy, spain, greece and turkey to achieve power... this would be the first step to world peace and progress in those mentioned societies.
 
Last edited:
Is anybody surprised? I said this was official US/regional position for the past three years. It's because US doesn't want religious people in power. Especially religious Sunni's who are self determined and consider interests of their people more important than foreign interests.

You want Daesh in power?
 
Religious means Daesh since when? o_O

Do you think you Shia's intimidate me with your hyperbole? Don't try that with me woman.

Not woman, lol.

But then, every other Islamist group asks the same question: religious means "rival group X" since when?

Why do you think everyone will agree to your definition of "good religious Sunni leadership"? Who defines a good Sunni leader?
 
Not woman, lol.

But then, every other Islamist group asks the same question: religious means "rival group X" since when?

Why do you think everyone will agree to your definition of "good religious Sunni leadership"? Who defines a good Sunni leader?

Good Sunni leadership is one that closely resembles that of the Prophet(SAW), his family and companions. There really isn't a way to 'define' it. Are you asking me to list some qualifications? That said, what I can tell you is that governments that represent Muslims today are far from what our Prophet(SAW) told us to seek.
 
Unlimited lanat on both... after killed hundred thousands of innocents .. they agreed not to kill further... we already did enough destruction.. now we will start new game on some other place....

time to put your new alliance in action maybe ?
 
Good Sunni leadership is one that closely resembles that of the Prophet(SAW), his family and companions. There really isn't a way to 'define' it. Are you asking me to list some qualifications? That said, what I can tell you is that governments that represent Muslims today are far from what our Prophet(SAW) told us to seek.

I'm not asking whether there's a way to define it.

I highlighted the word "who". Who gives you or someone else the authority to define good Sunni leadership? See the problem?

You will always have multiple Islamist groups going at each other's throats and laying an entire country to waste for power - it's been like this since day 1 after Prophet (pbuh)'s death.

Learn to separate religion from the state. It worked out well for Europeans. Arab society hasn't evolved to that point, yet.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom