Indian_Devil
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2014
- Messages
- 676
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
He is a politician, not an owner of slaughter house!!!! He should help strengthening social fabrics of India.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is a politician, not an owner of slaughter house!!!! He should help strengthening social fabrics of India.
They are Muslim version of VHP, RSS, Bjrang Dal, Shiv sena... when largest group have communal organizations then dont expect minorities to remain silent... also Akbar owaisi's hate speech was direct response of hindu togadia hate speech if i am not wrong
The difference is that, those organizations are condemned for being communal
while Owaisi mingles freely with 'secular' political parties.
'Hindutva' or the right wing Hindu communalism is reactionary in nature
it has grown because of this legitimization of the communal minority politics.
Yeah they are condemn so much that they are ruling India in shape of BJP+shiv sena
Bcoz both are less powerful in-front of hindutva brigade...so both join forces to oppose them.. what's wrong with it?
and owaisi brothers are in reaction of reactionaries btw against whom was their reaction?
plz explain as far as i know Muslims are most backward in India even more backward then low caste dalits...
1. Even in a majority Hindu state they cannot win elections, they don't even try. RSS has some influence in BJP govt., but VHP and Bajrang Dal don't. BJP itself was/is in power for a very short period in 70 long years, and they could come to power after a spectacular failure of the previous govt. and by promising development that they have shown in some BJP ruled state.
2. Hindutva brigade is barely a political force in India, and so called secular parties lose their moral highground by joining forces with Islamic fundamentalists.
3. Owaisi brothers are the representatives of the original communal powers of the Nizam of Hyderabad, that call for murdering Hindu population of Hyderabad in 15 minutes if police are removed came from that legacy.
4. Educated Muslims are as rich or as poor as any Indian, for the rest, blame their mullah-driven regressive society that prefers madrasas over free govt. schools, prohibits education for girls, prohibits contraceptives on religious grounds and breeds 20 children that they can't raise properly....everyone is responsible for their own state of life.
they have less time bcoz they rise in 90's before 90's they were nobody..
yeah as islamic fundamentalist with one seat in lok sabha present more threat to Indian security then gangs of hindutva fanatics with 290 seats.. and dont fool others kid.. Hindutva is ruling India and u are saying they are no force??????? you yourself said that RSS have influence on BJP..
Oh so u r justifying hindu fanaticism with a speech made in 2013 in response of hindu terrorists speech against Muslims ? there was no hindutva brigade prior to that?
again lie.. its systematic denial of progress by hindu fanatics either in congress or BJP to Muslims which hinders their progress.. Indian Muslim are not backward tribal as u are presenting here.. @jamahir can tell better..
Yes you are much correct after 1980 Gen. Zia and CIA (US) deliberately did this to produce more fighters for the Charlie Wilson's war against soviets and their success proved short lived and know we are cleaning the mess created in those days which so far claimed innocent 60000 Pakistani lives and probably millions in Afghanistan. We should disassociate politics and policies from religion because we are living in a global village with different people with different beliefs and religion, you can't impose your views on other.I was replying to @MaarKhoor for his sane posts, but you are more interested in one-upmanship, unfortunately Pakistanis don't have that moral ground to criticize any country on this planet on secularism, religious tolerance, fundamentalism and treatment of minority communities. Such an attempt is ridiculous, and I am just tired of showing mirror here. Sorry, but not interested.
Yes you are much correct after 1980 Gen. Zia and CIA (US) deliberately did this to produce more fighters for the Charlie Wilson's war against soviets and their success proved short lived and know we are cleaning the mess created in those days which so far claimed innocent 60000 Pakistani lives and probably millions in Afghanistan. We should disassociate politics and policies from religion because we are living in a global village with different people with different beliefs and religion, you can't impose your views on other.
Unfortunately religion is playing big part in the subcontinent's politics and the result will be more catastrophic. ISIS's evil lurking this subcontinent like a vulture waiting for the death.
Brother when cunning British left they make it sure that the leader they chose for rule over their colony never go for secularism or socialism, they left but imposed on us their policies.South Asia needed a leader like Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, but after independence we got leaders who were either too shaky to limit the reach of religion in political affairs (till 70s / 80s), and after that either used the religion as a tool in politics (in India), or used it for foreign policy and military affairs (in Pakistan). Btw, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was much influenced by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, maybe he could have made a difference if he had a chance, but that's just speculation, and subject to debate.
I was replying to @MaarKhoor for his sane posts, but you are more interested in one-upmanship
unfortunately Pakistanis don't have that moral ground to criticize any country on this planet on secularism, religious tolerance, fundamentalism and treatment of minority communities.
Hindustan has the right to ban beef.
Would make sure to slaughter cows this Eid then.
Charsada and Paris was conducted by barbarians/terrorists.
I was talking about Islamic Civilization--which was the first ever global civilization of human race and extended from Spain to Arab World--from India to Anatolia--From Indonesia to Cental Asia--and so on.
Only other civilization that can be compared to Islamic Civilization is West. That's it. No other civilization achieved such great heights and global influence everywhere.
Both West and Islamic World are still the largest/most powerful civilizations of the world and will remain so forever (since no other civilization has chance to arise--since humanity has reached its apex in terms of expansion, territorial conquests, and population growth rates).
In terms of size and global presence, Islamic World is largest civilization of today--West is most powerful.
But what would a person of backward, uncultured land know about high civilizations? Hell, hinduism was gang r@ped by superior Muslims first--then Westerners. lol. Even now your country has more Muslims than entire Russia has christians.
they have less time bcoz they rise in 90's before 90's they were nobody..
yeah as islamic fundamentalist with one seat in lok sabha present more threat to Indian security then gangs of hindutva fanatics with 290 seats.. and dont fool others kid.. Hindutva is ruling India and u are saying they are no force??????? you yourself said that RSS have influence on BJP..
Oh so u r justifying hindu fanaticism with a speech made in 2013 in response of hindu terrorists speech against Muslims ? there was no hindutva brigade prior to that?
again lie.. its systematic denial of progress by hindu fanatics either in congress or BJP to Muslims which hinders their progress.. Indian Muslim are not backward tribal as u are presenting here.. @jamahir can tell better..