What's new

Article 35A: Biggest constitutional fraud in the history of India

Article 370 Will also go in this Winter Session

Exactly that thing came to my mind when I was tagged by @Levina

BTW when BJP is going to get majority in RS and if yes how sessions it will have to have both the houses majority before the end of current Parliament?

I thing BJP should ready all the bills like 370, land reformation and whatever for the greater sake of country and pass it with voice vote. That's it. After that who cares who comes? :D

@Viny Hmmmmm.... why not have time sharing basis and we can all put our money together and by a beautiful big area?:D
 
.
Seeing your comprehension skills it firmly, implies :-

You are in 15-20yrs, as per Mental Capability.
Have No clue on International Matters or Parliamentary Affairs.
You stick your Head out of Butt with No logical reason to have a Sensible Dialogue.

It will be my sincere advise to you to read before replying----- I want to have a Assertion for a Retort ----not a Head-Banger.

Take Care
Seeing your bs it firmly implies that my comment really get on your nerves and u r one of those stupid bhagat ;)

You mean Bhakt. Right? :coffee:
Whatever u know what I mean ;)
 
.
I thing BJP should ready all the bills like 370, land reformation and whatever for the greater sake of country and pass it with voice vote. That's it. After that who cares who comes?
Dada, if BJP succeeds in getting those issues sorted out in legislature, they would've taken care of most contentious issues in their manifesto and for voter like me, they can remain assured of my vote to them.
 
.
wow, didn't knew such a provision existed!
But the larger question which stuck me reading the article was status of citizens of state who moved from Pakistan and still don't enjoy full set of rights. In larger context special treatment given to state of J&K must now progressively be withdrawn. Times have changed and unless J&K is treated at par with other states, it is a disadvantageous position to both Central and state governments, economically and administratively.
A lot of people tend to associate article 370 removal with Right wing Hindu politics which i guess is very unfair. The issue is that of country's federal structure and unless all citizens are treated at par, don't think its a healthy situation for us to be in for very long.
First step imho should be allowing citizens to freely purchase land in state, for this single step could bring a big change. Rest could follow.

Also tagging for views on article
@AUSTERLITZ @scorpionx @Nilgiri @Joe Shearer @jbgt90
we cant include J&K in federal structure... removing special provision is akin to breaking promises given to then kashmiri leaders... its a betrayal...
govt of India can keep repeating atoot ang but that does not make it true..

do you ever give word to people and then refuse to do it because 'situation changed'... dont you feel dirty about your own self when you do that?
 
.
we cant include J&K in federal structure... removing special provision is akin to breaking promises given to then kashmiri leaders... its a betrayal...
govt of India can keep repeating atoot ang but that does not make it true..

do you ever give word to people and then refuse to do it because 'situation changed'... dont you feel dirty about your own self when you do that?
Change is inevitable!
Change is constant!!!

Dada, if BJP succeeds in getting those issues sorted out in legislature, they would've taken care of most contentious issues in their manifesto and for voter like me, they can remain assured of my vote to them.

I’m shocked by Govt’s lack of will in this case. :tsk:

E284E729-D61D-45EC-861D-24437AC5700F.png
 
.
do you ever give word to people and then refuse to do it because 'situation changed'... dont you feel dirty about your own self when you do that?
But how long do you feel this arrangement can continue. Governance and budgetary support to state is what any other state gets, why should there be any different treatment to J&k?
 
.
It is time both 35A and 370 is thrown into dustbins. Yes the separatists will make noise. But the noise is not something new, they have been doing it since last one year. Let people for allover India settle in Kashmir.
 
.




I hope SC nullifies Art-35A, the hurdle in the overall development of J&K.
Fingers crossed!
Didi you are the best....I'm hoping and praying for this to happen!!!

we cant include J&K in federal structure... removing special provision is akin to breaking promises given to then kashmiri leaders... its a betrayal...
govt of India can keep repeating atoot ang but that does not make it true..

do you ever give word to people and then refuse to do it because 'situation changed'... dont you feel dirty about your own self when you do that?
Who gave the 'word' then? Definitely not the lawmakers who represent people of INDIA...when word was not given in the first place...how can it be taken back?
 
.
But how long do you feel this arrangement can continue. Governance and budgetary support to state is what any other state gets, why should there be any different treatment to J&k?
because J&K is not a 'state'.... why do you feel victimized by an arrangement that was already agreed... if anything JK people should be upset by slow eroding of the deal given to them..
we can always have another go. remove these deals and sign another one ... I doubt we will get better one..

Change is inevitable!
Change is constant!!!
you seem to rejoice at the change as it benefits you.. i am not opposed to change in a deal as long as other party is given fair chance to reject the new deal.. otherwise its just.. 'I got guns, so stfu'.
 
.
because J&K is not a 'state'.... why do you feel victimized by an arrangement that was already agreed... if anything JK people should be upset by slow eroding of the deal given to them..
we can always have another go. remove these deals and sign another one ... I doubt we will get better one..
What good this article has done to the state of j&k!?
 
.
Didi you are the best....I'm hoping and praying for this to happen!!!


Who gave the 'word' then? Definitely not the lawmakers who represent people of INDIA...when word was not given in the first place...how can it be taken back?
from kashmiri point of view its a betrayal based on technicality...

from kashmiri point of view its a betrayal based on technicality...
good question.. am not kashmiri.. so I guess they will repeal it from their side... coz it totally hurts them.. :)
why would I pretend change a deal because its 'beneficial to other side'....
 
.
from kashmiri point of view its a betrayal based on technicality...


good question.. am not kashmiri.. so I guess they will repeal it from their side... coz it totally hurts them.. :)
why would I pretend change a deal because its 'beneficial to other side'....
Technicality!! That's what this case is for! One stupid man's mistake is causing the suffering of millions of people...it has to end now!
 
.
Technicality!! That's what this case is for! One stupid man's mistake is causing the suffering of millions of people...it has to end now!
you call it 'mistake'.. I call it 'sweetening a deal'.... are you going to give fair chance to the other side to debate and reject a new deal? I very much doubt it...
so this is how I see it... your company wanted a factory on my land.. i wanted to sell my land... your CEO did a deal by paying the price plus sweetened the deal with job for my son... fast forward to 10 years your CEO was sacked due to financial misappropriation... and this deal came into picture... you sacked my son...

from my point of view, your CEO doing something wrong is hardly the reason for me being punished.. to rub salt you claim that my son has better future in other companies and you let him go so that he can 'achieve his full potential'...
the only way is for my son to voluntarily resign and we both do a new deal.. but then.. am just a farmer and have no financial muscle to enforce it.
 
Last edited:
.
you call it 'mistake'.. I call it 'sweetening a deal'.... are you going to give fair chance to the other side to debate and reject a new deal? I very much doubt it...
so this is how I see it... your company wanted a factory on my land.. i wanted to sell my land... you did a deal by paying the price plus sweetened the deal with job for my son... fast forward to 10 years your CEO was sacked due to financial misappropriation... and this deal came into picture... you sacked my son...

from my point of view, your CEO doing something wrong is hardly the reason for me being punished.. to rub salt you claim that my son has better future in other companies and you let him go so that he can achieve his full potential...
the only way is for my son to voluntarily resign and we both do a new deal.. but then.. am just a farmer and have no financial muscle to enforce it.
Your cute little story shows how naive you are.....article 35a will be scrapped it's just the matter of when...once it happens j&k lawmakers can negotiate an economic package given to backward states...like the one given to bihar,jharkand and chattisgarh.
 
.
Your cute little story shows how naive you are.....article 35a will be scrapped it's just the matter of when...once it happens j&k lawmakers can negotiate an economic package given to backward states...like the one given to bihar,jharkand and chattisgarh.
so more of less ' I got the gun, so stfu liberal whore' ... lol... that wins every fcuking argument..

i have told others but here it is again..'often we discuss things to give our view on what should happen, not what will happen'.... I was dealing with 'should' bit... sorry for misunderstanding...
its not comparable to bihar, jharkhand, chattisgarh due to the way it joined the union.. any pretension not to realize(atoot ang?) is your issue not mine.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom