What's new

Army fears US could leak data to Pakistan if India-US sign military secrecy pact

Suriya

BANNED
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
4,149
Reaction score
-42
Country
India
Location
India
https://theprint.in/security/army-o...rs-america-could-leak-data-to-pakistan/88046/


The Pentagon’s position is that the agreement is required by law if the US is to export sensitive military equipment to a country.


New Delhi: The Indian Army has objected to a military secrecy pact with the United States ahead of the maiden ‘2+2’ dialogue involving the defence and foreign ministers of the two countries in Delhi this September.

Speaking on the proposed Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA), an official source told ThePrint, “We risk compromising our encrypted (coded) communication and a leak of information to Pakistan.”

In a note to the government, the Indian Army has asked if it would be wise to sign the COMCASA. The government is yet to make up its mind.

The note makes two points:

1) The US was asked if signing the COMCASA could mean that it could listen to or see encrypted (coded) communication of the Indian military.

The US said yes, it could, but added that it was not its policy

2) The US was asked if this information could be shared with others, notably Pakistan.

The US said it had adequate firewalls.

The COMCASA is a re-named version of a pact that was first proposed more than 10 years ago, the Communications Interoperability and Secrecy Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA).

The Pentagon’s position is that the COMCASA is required by law if the US is to export sensitive military equipment to a country, describing it as a “foundational agreement” for military-to-military cooperation.

In the note, the Army said India was in the process of buying sensitive equipment from the US.

This includes two major platforms: The M777 ultra light howitzers (the first of which have reached India) and the Apache AH 64E attack helicopters, for which a contract has been signed.

The M777 is a piece of heavy artillery that is lightly carried. It can be transported by road and by air in the mountains. Conventional military sense is that India is buying these guns for use on the China frontier.

The Apache attack helicopters — that are being inducted by the Army though it is an aerial weapon the Indian Air Force had asked for — are meant to support land forces as well as to interdict adversaries in tough terrain. It is meant primarily for the western (Pakistan) frontier.

There are other “foundational agreements” with the US that India has signed. They are:

1) An End User Verification understanding, by which US inspectors certify that “military platforms are being used for the purpose they are intended”.

2) A Logistics Support Agreement, renamed to make it India-specific, the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA). This allows the militaries of the two countries to operate jointly without having to pay for the costs in cash but be able to barter facilities.

Both agreements are valid for 10 years, after which they have to be renewed.

India has another military secrecy pact with the US: The General Secrecy of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA). India, however, considers the GSOMIA to be “non-intrusive”, unlike COMCASA.
 
Why hasnt US ensured that these weapons being sold to India mustnt be used against Pakistan, and r only used for their intended purpose ie China including that m777?? which india has actually brought for the use against Pakistan in Kashmir front which itself is a disputed territory.

And same is for Apache? If US can ensure that its F16s arnt used against india or cant leave the Pakistani airspace for deep strikes in india, then how can one be ensured that Apache and the incoming UCAVs of india of american origin r only used for defensive purpose and cant be used against a foreign country who will be at a defensive war with them and not leave their airspace or territory??
 
yes they will if they need us in some nxt war such as iran war
 
yes they will if they need us in some nxt war such as iran war

Mubarak... aap PM ban gaye...

On topic

Sharing your communication codes with a country whose current head is a master of flip-flop... is like shooting yourself...

Secrecy and deception are great tools...
 
Every country will provide their encrypted secured communication , nuclear secrets to a smaller nation since they are not scared :lol:
Do you call center bhakts understand what CISMOA is?
If not, avoid commenting or Ill ensure you dont.
 
Why hasnt US ensured that these weapons being sold to India mustnt be used against Pakistan, and r only used for their intended purpose ie China including that m777?? which india has actually brought for the use against Pakistan in Kashmir front which itself is a disputed territory.

And same is for Apache? If US can ensure that its F16s arnt used against india or cant leave the Pakistani airspace for deep strikes in india, then how can one be ensured that Apache and the incoming UCAVs of india of american origin r only used for defensive purpose and cant be used against a foreign country who will be at a defensive war with them and not leave their airspace or territory??
Because they can't...Geo-politics is not about good guy/bad guy...good deeds/bad deeds...it is very much transactional...It was the same US in 71, that sent 7th fleet and had USSR not covered us, would have smacked us right and left....At that time Pakistan as an ally was more important than so called non-aligned India...in 65 Pakistan was not as important, for US to look other way, when they used American weapons on us...Thanks to out shi**y defense manufacturing capability(or lack of it), Indian appetite for imported weapons is huge and that's a market no one wants to ignore...geo-politics also warrants the same...so from American perspective...it is illogical to cry wolf....they will, if there is any incentive in doing so...
 
Back
Top Bottom