What's new

Arms seized by U.S., missiles used to attack Saudi Arabia 'of Iranian origin': U.N.

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
June 11, 2020

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Cruise missiles used in several attacks on oil facilities and an international airport in Saudi Arabia last year were of “Iranian origin,” U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council in a report seen by Reuters on Thursday.

Guterres also said several items in U.S. seizures of weapons and related materiel in November 2019 and February 2020 were “of Iranian origin.”

Some have design characteristics similar to those also produced by a commercial entity in Iran, or bear Farsi markings, Guterres said, and some were delivered to the country between February 2016 and April 2018.

He said that “these items may have been transferred in a manner inconsistent” with a 2015 Security Council resolution that enshrines Tehran’s deal with world powers to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons.

Iran’s mission to the United Nations said there were “serious flaws, inaccuracies and discrepancies” in the report.

“Iran categorically rejects the observations contained in the Report concerning the Iranian connection to the export of weapons or their components that are used in attacks on Saudi Arabia and the Iranian origin of alleged U.S. seizures of armaments,” the mission in New York said in a statement.

Washington is pushing the 15-member council to extend an arms embargo on Iran that is due to expire in October under the nuclear deal. Council veto-powers Russia and China have already signaled their opposition to the move.

Guterres reports twice a year to the Security Council on the implementation of an arms embargo on Iran and other restrictions that remained in place after the deal.

The U.N. chief said the United Nations examined debris of weapons used in attacks on a Saudi oil facility in Afif in May, on the Abha international airport in June and August and on the Saudi Aramco oil facilities in Khurais and Abqaiq in September.

“The Secretariat assesses that the cruise missiles and/or parts thereof used in the four attacks are of Iranian origin,” Guterres wrote. Guterres also said that drones used in the May and September attacks were “of Iranian origin.”

He also said the United Nations had observed that some items in the two U.S. seizures “were identical or similar” to those found in the debris of the cruise missiles and the drones used in the 2019 attacks on Saudi Arabia.

The Security Council is due to discuss Guterres’ report later this month.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Kelly Craft has said she will circulate a draft resolution to extend the arms embargo on Iran soon. If Washington is unsuccessful, it has threatened to trigger a return of all U.N. sanctions on Iran under the nuclear deal, even though it quit the accord in 2018. Diplomats say Washington would likely face a tough, messy battle.

Iran has breached parts of the nuclear deal in response to the U.S. withdrawal and Washington’s reimposition of sanctions.

“I call upon all Member States to avoid provocative rhetoric and actions that may have a negative impact on regional stability,” Guterres wrote in the 14-page report.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...di-arabia-of-iranian-origin-u-n-idUSKBN23J08C
 
. .
Iranian forum members already, proudly claim that it is their galactic drones. So, will Saudi's respond or bomb some school bus?
 
.
Iranian forum members already, proudly claim that it is their galactic drones. So, will Saudi's respond or bomb some school bus?
what kind of nonsense reply is this. ofcourse the attaack on saudi oil facilities were either directly from iran or sponsored by iran. iran just reminded saudi it can knock out their oil with just 1 attack
the saudis were getting too big for their boots i mean sandals.
 
.
what kind of nonsense reply is this. ofcourse the attaack on saudi oil facilities were either directly from iran or sponsored by iran. iran just reminded saudi it can knock out their oil with just 1 attack
the saudis were getting too big for their boots i mean sandals.
What's nonsense? In case, it is directly an Iranian attack then they have to take some heads. In another case, Iran is a b*tch.
 
.
Iran acts like a terrorist state and thinks it can do anything with anybody and not get a slap in return. I think it is time that everyone gets together and fixes this disease once and for all.
 
.
What's nonsense? In case, it is directly an Iranian attack then they have to take some heads. In another case, Iran is a b*tch.
isnt it embarassing for a country to buy such large amounts of western weaponry hundreds of billions of dollars and at the end being owned by a simple attack. what makes you think they have the competence or courage to take directly on iran themselves.

in the other case too, turkey is a b*itch.

Iran acts like a terrorist state and thinks it can do anything with anybody and not get a slap in return. I think it is time that everyone gets together and fixes this disease once and for all.
bla bla
 
.
what kind of nonsense reply is this. ofcourse the attaack on saudi oil facilities were either directly from iran or sponsored by iran. iran just reminded saudi it can knock out their oil with just 1 attack
the saudis were getting too big for their boots i mean sandals.
They were sponsored by Iran otherwise you would have seen a response on Iran itself..like the response of killing Suleimany in Iraq..

isnt it embarassing for a country to buy such large amounts of western weaponry hundreds of billions of dollars and at the end being owned by a simple attack. what makes you think they have the competence or courage to take directly on iran themselves.

in the other case too, turkey is a b*itch.


bla bla
Its embarrassing for Iran to use proxies..
The attack owned nothing ..all the damage was repaired in 24 hours..
Your answer just shows your jealousy of hundreds of billions of dollars western arms purchase.. if Iran wanted them to be used against it..it would have attacked directly..not through proxies..
 
Last edited:
.
They were sponsored by Iran otherwise you would have seen a response on Iran itself..like the response of killing Suleimany in Iraq..


Its embarrassing for Iran to use proxies..
The attack owned nothing ..all the damage was repaired in 24 hours..
Your answer just shows your jealousy of hundreds of billions of dollars western arms purchase.. if Iran wanted them o be used against it..it would have attacked directly..not through proxies..
haha
 
. .
Washington is pushing the 15-member council to extend an arms embargo on Iran that is due to expire in October under the nuclear deal.
one month later fox news: breaking news, our sources in white house indicate that last night president trump in an act to stop Iran military deals with Russia did sleep with president Putin.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Kelly Craft has said she will circulate a draft resolution to extend the arms embargo on Iran soon. If Washington is unsuccessful, it has threatened to trigger a return of all U.N. sanctions on Iran under the nuclear deal, even though it quit the accord in 2018. Diplomats say Washington would likely face a tough, messy battle.
lol you teared apart the deal.
 
.
Fake claims of the lawless redneck gang posing as diplomats:

Iran rejects U.N. report that arms 'of Iranian origin' used in Saudi attacks

Iran’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement carried by state media that “Iran denies allegations by the U.N. Secretariat that appear to have been made under political pressure from the U.S. and Saudi regimes”.

Interestingly, the ... report comes at a time when the United States is working to draft a dangerous resolution to extend an arms embargo against Iran,” the statement said.


The redneck gang is trying desperately:

Washington Ramps Up Efforts to Kill Iran Deal Ahead of October Arms Embargo Expiry
 
.
isnt it embarassing for a country to buy such large amounts of western weaponry hundreds of billions of dollars and at the end being owned by a simple attack.what makes you think they have the competence or courage to take directly on iran themselves.
Why doesn't Iran openly attack, and learn? What are you afraid of? Sandals?
 
Last edited:
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom