What's new

Are all terrorists really Muslims?By Aakar Patel

Of course. We need men and women who will not be cowed down by terror. To the terrorists, counter terror is also terror. The majority of coward Hindu saints can't fight the devils, can they?

See - you can have your thing, blow up, not blow up - it's upto you. But in India, our culture, our way of life, our self respect is non negotiable.

A structure built on top of our holiest of places - Not negotiable.
Burning a trainload of Hindu pilgrims in broad daylight - Not negotiable.\

Actually, I am not bothered about what Christian terrorists do in Lebanon, or Shias do in Yemen or Sunnis do in ... well the rest of the world. Hell, I don't care much about Hindus in Bangladesh for example. I would be happy to settle in India, but otherwise I they are NOT my responsibility if they stay as Bangladeshis.

But try throwing acid on a Hanuman Jayanti procession in Jawad (Madhya Pradesh). - Yes this happened yesterday. Repercussions will be there.


1, :) hiding behind words like way of life/culture instead of clearly saying Your RELIGION, well this is lame .

if for you your culture or religion is non-negotiable then may be same for others. So if you consider it as justification for repercussions aka counter terrorism then others can also justify theirs on the basis of same.
 
Last edited:
. .
Sir, please tell me why is it so easy to mould youth of a particular religion into terrorist activities by "foreigners"??? And the moulding or nurturing does occur at harvard/stanford..rather your own religious school by your own priests....

all are involved even our own priests. To understand or answer your question you need to understand and know psychological warfare . Its a big tool.

And its easy because when you are under attack from two dozen cultures of the world just because they feel threatened by yours :) then you are bound to be easily mold by physiological warfare
 
. .
those who razed Babri Mosque and killed Muslims in Gujrat did chant har har mahadeve so arent they Hindu terrorists?




because your countryman brought Yamen into his debate and tried to link it with Islam and terrorism.

where as Yamen issue is political not religious
taali ek haath se nahi bajti hai..
Babri Masjid issue tested the patience of hindus,and it was left as it is for years.Some day the anger was going to take its toll.
And you remember gujarat,but conveniently ignore what happened a day earlier.
almost 50 devotees were brutally killed by muslims.Hindus just retalliated.
 
.
taali ek haath se nahi bajti hai..
Babri Masjid issue tested the patience of hindus,and it was left as it is for years.Some day the anger was going to take its toll.
And you remember gujarat,but conveniently ignore what happened a day earlier.
almost 50 devotees were brutally killed by muslims.Hindus just retalliated.
There is no proof yet that muslims bombed said train. It is the hindutva that have changed history to suit themselves. Even if muslims were responsible killing 10000 in "response" is justificable?
 
.
What war justifies killing 100 plus school children?
NO war can justify that rather any killing even if it is against the terrorists. you cant justify civilians' killing. No one is justifying anything here. the debate is why identify one terrorism with a religion and ignore other terrorism by identify them with ethnicity or nationality instead of religion.
 
.
Sir, please tell me why is it so easy to mould youth of a particular religion into terrorist activities by "foreigners"??? And the moulding or nurturing does occur at harvard/stanford..rather your own religious school by your own priests....

That is Islam's natural affiliation to everything dreadful.
 
.
There is no proof yet that muslims bombed said train. It is the hindutva that have changed history to suit themselves. Even if muslims were responsible killing 10000 in "response" is justificable?
The muslims who killed hindus in a train have been already convicted.Some of them even got death penalty.Just because the media doesn't cover these issues,doesn't mean they did not take place...
And muslims killed hundreds of hindus in the godhra riots..
So it was never a single sided thing..never
 
.
What war justifies killing 100 plus school children?
NO war can justify that rather any killing even if it is against the terrorists. you cant justify civilians' killing. No one is justifying anything here. the debate is why identify one terrorism with a religion and ignore other terrorism by identify them with ethnicity or nationality instead of religion.
 
.
When "Christian terrorism" is mentioned the examples the example given is bombing of abortion clinics in the US. There have only been seven in the last forty years so it is hardly a worthy comparison.
 
. .
When "Christian terrorism" is mentioned the examples the example given is bombing of abortion clinics in the US. There have only been seven in the last forty years so it is hardly a worthy comparison.

There are plenty of Christian terrorists in India. They killed a lot of people just a few months ago.
 
. .
nothing is deardful than Hindu terrorism against Muslims in India

Please, the number of causalities in all Hindu-Muslim riots in India in the whole past 70 years is less than the figures of Muslim death in Karachi for a single year. There has never been a case of Hindu terrorism but plenty of Islamic terrorism in India.

Bodo terrorist group called NDFB whose main objective is to establish a Christian state. They killed about 80 tribals purportedly Christians because they were celebrating Hindu festivals and going to Hindu temples.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom