asad71
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- May 24, 2011
- Messages
- 6,863
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
I do have a question though as to it's place in the force demonstration hierarchy. We all know they that any direct conflict b.w Russia, China and US would involve heightened risk of nuclear exchange and which is the precisely the reason that since WW2 while there have been multiple skirmishes by way of proxies - each party has time and again stepped back from the brink.
So while AC might be great for strategic purposes like force projection, controlling or denying SLOC, bombing far off smaller countries with minimal logistics and can be considered as extension of deterrent measures - they are unlikely to see any real action which might leave them vulnerable.
1.Initial purpose of the AC was to have a mobile air-field. Now it has evolved into much more than that. However, some observers have been seeing the development of long range aircraft and mid-air refueling as the end of the AC. This is not happening - at least not very soon. Superpowers use carrier groups to project their power and assure their authority.
2. Beside the AC or ACs, the carrier group will have other naval craft like supply ships, frigates / corvettes, destroyers, subs, missile boats and much more. There would be around 7,500 Marines fully equipped to be launched at a desired location. The aircraft on board, the AC herself and accompanying ships would carry missiles including nuclear armed. In short the carrier group is a true strategic force in the hands of the higher authority - something that the naval thinker Mahan had dreamed about.