Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Today’s launch, whose impact point was at sea
for indians
Well, lots of pro or anti...
Testing is normal. And you do not see from the outside what is tested, nor would someone tell you what he did improve. So foreigners claiming that there was nothing to be tested. Sure. Every missile is a copy of each other and they all have the same parameters. And only Indians claim crashed tests as partially success...
The major lesson from this test is that is is launched at a sea target. So here we see probably a follow up of the carrier killer 400AKG. We see on both sides major improvements on protecting sea routes (or denying the opposite side). This is one of the few next to the 400AKG and sea launched Babur that means that we might not need to buy dozens of ships but do you wanna risk being hit in the middle of the sea? So yes we continue on asymmetric warfare.
Since 400AKG id full TOT (which was a full secret till now) we all can see what it will mean to our smart usage of technology!
I have made up a little map,covering 900KMs being fired from Gwadar in a mobile launcher or an underground silo.
If it is meant to be,what you said its meant to be than it is a bad news for the Indian navy and its planned carriers...very bad news.
@Luftwaffe @AhaseebA @Munir @Yzd Khalifa @nuclearpak @Armstrong
"Today’s launch, whose impact point was at sea"
Question: Was Target stationary or moving as generally sea Targetare not stationary.
Now I'm thinking why PN established Strategic Force Command NSFC as custodian of the country's nuclear second strike capability.
I think there is a need to put all the things in perspective as I think this all kicked off due to my post in the first page.
The launch was not at a target on the sea nor was it a carrier killer or anything, it was just a normal ballistic missile with a target made at the sea just as it would have been on land. It was made on the sea because of restriction issues on land.
Launches from the South of Pakistan are made into the sea while those from Attock or Jhelum go towards Balochistan.
Now why was this statement made bold and noticed? Because in a couple of launches before when the launch site was in SIndh, there was a discussion among members that the launch was towards sea. Me and @AhaseebA vouched for it and said that launches are conducted towards the sea. Some Indian members pointed out that Pakistan does not have the capability to track missile movement and hence cannot launch MRBM's into the sea. At that point, we had no proof so couldn't prove the point further and laid it to rest.
Now this statement comes which indirectly shows that Pakistan does indeed have capability to track MRBM's over sea and check the target point.
This has nothing to do with a carrier killer, or a Naval strategic command or naval missile or anything.
@Munir, I hope this clears up things.
Why Shaheen Again ? Why not Developing and testing new platforms
Compared to the earlier Shaheen-1A, I noticed two bands under the cone of the missile tested today
Does that imply to something or is it just the commo pattern. ??
New Recruit
What do you expect from our enemies?