Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
You have not seen the replies submitted by AG or FG and you are "satisfied" to that level that you are oblivious NAB is going to demolish this case, this is strange.
Where did I say that NAB is going to demolish the case?
All I am saying is, that their lawyer submitted a reply to NAB with regards to the initial inquiry, and at the moment, there is no more progress.
Baki meri taraf say us ko phansi laga dain mera kia ja raha hai
As the land in question is 'Shamlat', the government didn't do anything illegal.
Shamlat is jointly owned by the community and as per the law, if anyone sells Shamlat to someone who is not "Aala Malik" in the Mauza/Village (direct descendants of those who originally founded the village) the title automatically is transferred back to Aala Maliks in 15 days. Shamlat is not meant to be used for personal purposes.
It's entirely upto the government if they compensate all Aala Maliks before acquiring Shamlat land(s) in any village of Punjab. They are not bound to do that when the land is being acquired for any public project.
PTI government acquired Shamlats throughout Punjab during their tenure without compensating entire villages. Mianwali too is a part of Punjab
Having been involved in the processes of land acquisition and transfers for personal purposes myself over the past month or so, one thing I can confidently say is that land laws are a whooole other level of complexity.
I've done engineering, but I can safely say land laws are a whole other beast!