What's new

Angry India tells US 'times have changed' after diplomat spat

She first lied that she was arrested in front of her children that turned out to be a lie.

She was arrested in front of her child , that is accepted she was not handcuffed in front of her child

Two Judges of Adarsh Panel said she lied to get a house meant for war widows if you want to make her a role model go ahead.

America should mind its own business ...


Cavity search also includes mouth search and just spreading your legs while standing and only in extreme cases does someone insert a finger in your anus or vagina. given her track record of lying this will be disapproved to.

I,d rather believe the diplomat than the two faced hypocritical liars in D.C you wish to believe .... Preet Barrara has lost all his dignity by Washington staying away form his statements ...

Guess you like crooks better then the war widows of Kargil.

Take your emotional temper tantrums elsewhere , you have been talking nonsense from the very beginning
 
its time for Indian gov, media and people to drop this case. its a case of a consulate worker violating the law of the US and lets trust the justice system to play itself out.
 
Why not explain?


The defendant was a deputy consulate not a diplomat, India government want to transfer to UN mission to have a full immunity but UN can throw her out because she violated the no human traffic clause and no exploitation of slave labor law.

Are u so retarded that you don't read news? The US did try to sneak him out under Diplomatic laws but a Judge ruled that he did not have diplomatic immunity and hence he had to face a trial. Then the corrupt Pakistani middleman stepped in and said pay shariah blood money and we will look the other way. The rest is history. Raymond Davis should have been tried in Pakistan.




Under Pakistan court they accept the compensation money therefore he free to leave Pakistan.
 
@faithful guy considering that the diplomat is the one being humiliated for no reason we are of course angry about that. This does not mean that we don't care about the maid. It is not as simple as that. We are objecting to the lady's treatment. She didn't murder someone she simply underpaid someone. There are several cases in the US where even murderers don't get treated like this.
 
The defendant was a deputy consulate not a diplomat, India government want to transfer to UN mission to have a full immunity but UN can throw her out because she violated the no human traffic clause and no exploitation of slave labor law.






Under Pakistan court they accept the compensation money therefore he free to leave Pakistan.
he face the court and freed to leave, not much you can complain about the injustice being done here.
 
Where is the concern for the victim and her family who was harassed in India?

Quite telling..
One simple question i have,do you know why the alleged victims family was taken to US 2 days before the diplomats arrest.
 
The defendant was a deputy consulate not a diplomat, India government want to transfer to UN mission to have a full immunity but UN can throw her out because she violated the no human traffic clause and no exploitation of slave labor law.






Under Pakistan court they accept the compensation money therefore he free to leave Pakistan.

I cannot believe that Indians are not outrageous over this slave owner and human trafficker. This is sick.
 
I'm getting the feel from the outrageous support of this criminal lady when her abused maid should be the one getting the support.



She has consulate immunity, not diplomatic immunity. google consulate immunity and read it yourself.
So they had the right to do what they did,then why all the problems between the US and India?
 
She was arrested in front of her child , that is accepted she was not handcuffed in front of her child


HA HA INDIAN FAN BOY NOW CLIMBS DOWN FORM HER DRAMA VERSION OF BEING HAND CUFFED IN FRONT HE CHILDREN AS SHE EMAILED MANY PEOPLE ABOUT THE SAME AS WELL AS HER FATHER CLAIMED. PREET BHARARA HAS STAKED HIS HAT THAT SHE WAS NOT ARRESTED IN FRONT OF HER CHILDREN TOO AND HE WONT LIE AS THAT PLACE IS FULL OF CC TV'S

America should mind its own business ...

THEN DON'T SEND CROOKED DIPLOMATS TO THE USA.

I,d rather believe the diplomat than the two faced hypocritical liars in D.C you wish to believe .... Preet Barrara has lost all his dignity by Washington staying away form his statements ...

SO THE TWO JUDGES OF INDIA WHO SAY SHE STOLE A FLAT MEANT FOR WAR WIDOWS BY MAKING A FALSE DECLARATIONS ARE ON THE PAY ROLL OF THE US?

Take your emotional temper tantrums elsewhere , you have been talking nonsense from the very beginning

YOU ARE EMOTIONALLY STUNTED. THERE ARE 5 BRITS WHO WERE ON A SHIP WHICH ENTERED INDIAN WATERS AND WE HAVE NOR PROBLEMS OF THEIR ARREST AS LONG AS THEY GET A FAIR AND SPEEDY TRIAL. CROOKS HAVE NO PLACE IN SOCIETY.
 
Do you even know whats going on ?
Maybe its normal for authorities to finger your women and violate basic privacies but its not normal here . We are rightfully angry and upset ...
Why should it be settled in American court ? American court and laws have no jurisdiction on her..
Basic Common sense ...

lets c cuz she lied on visa application.?!? now you would say she is got immunity...a claim american officials disagree.

whatever both of us have known is through media...so it would be pretty immature to say you know who says truth and who lies.
 
Well..............she is sexy :p::toast_sign::smitten::smitten::smitten::pakistan: ........ I think i should conselt SHOAIB MALIK... after all he has such a sucessful experience :lol::D
Exclusive! Kerry, Burns, Biswal not informed of action against Khobragade
December 18, 2013 11:56 IST

18devyani1.jpg
The investigation into and action being taken by the US State Department's Diplomatic Security Service against Dr Devyani Khobragade were not shared with Secretary of State John F Kerry, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns or Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Nisha Desai Biswal, reveals Rediff.com's Aziz Haniffa from Washington, DC.
S
enior American administration and law enforcement sources have told Rediff.com that the political and career leadership at the State Department -- from Secretary of State John F Kerry, down to Deputy Secretary of State William Burns and the newly minted Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Nisha Desai Biswal -- had absolutely no clue that at the time they were meeting with Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh, that an arrest warrant was being prepared by US Attorney Preet Bharara's office to arrest India's Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade, left, on visa fraud charges -- on the strength of an affidavit provided it by the State Department.
Ironically, at the time Kerry dropped in at the meeting between Burns and Singh and the respective delegations, and both sides were appreciating the camaraderie between Washington and New Delhi -- so much so that India officials said, "The partnership has reached a level where you can discuss pretty much anything, including issues where there are differences in perspective" -- unbeknownst to them, US Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York Debra Freeman had signed off on the warrant requested by Bharara for US Marshalls to arrest, handcuff and strip-search Dr Khobragade, which action set off an unprecedented diplomatic row between India and the US.
The sources said that the investigation into the alleged fraud, conducted by Special Agent Mark J Smith with the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service, had been going on for over a year.
The DSS was working in concert with the State Department's consular services bureau, which in turn had alerted the Indian embassy in September that such an investigation against Dr Khobragade was under way and action could be taken for violation of US laws.
However, this information and its gravity of an imminent arrest had not reached those dealing with India like Burns and Biswal or Sujatha Singh's diplomatic counterpart, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman.
Like it happened during the Benghazi fiasco, where then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not informed of the security concerns expressed by Ambassador Chris Stevens, the US envoy to Libya, who was later killed along with three other Americans by terrorists who stormed the Benghazi consulate, the investigation and action being formulated by the DSS against Dr Khobragade had not been conveyed to Burns, Sherman or Biswal.
Evidently, Special Agent Smith had scrupulously prepared his case anticipating the fallout from an arrest of a diplomat like Dr Khobragade.
His affidavit submitted to Bharara's office says how besides reviewing dutifully the official database of the Department of State, he had also checked with the latter's protocol section which, he said, is 'the entity that accredits foreign diplomats and determines immunity levels. And I know that Khobragade enjoys limited diplomatic immunity with respect to only those acts undertaken in her official capacity.'
Thus, when Burns and Biswal came to know of the Khobragade case as everyone else did through news reports, the horse had already left the barn, or as one diplomatic observer told this correspondent, "The shit had hit the fan," with New Delhi taking a set of actions unprecedented in the annals of the US-India diplomatic and political experience.
Burns and Biswal and US Ambassador in New Delhi Nancy Powell are in full damage control mode. Kerry, travelling in Southeast Asia, has been made aware of the diplomatic and political spat.
The State Department officials have appealed to Delhi for understanding, and are in constant touch with their counterparts at the ministry of external affairs.
Since the matter is now sub judice, the State Department officials have to be extremely scrupulous about their statements as even a tinge of apology would mean they are questioning the very investigation carried on by the very agency they belong to and more importantly could have implications on the case when it is heard.
Thus, one source told Rediff.com, "There is absolutely no way, let alone a formal apology, even anything close to what can be construed as an apology will be made."
What was giving likely worry lines to Burns, Biswal and other senior officials who deal with India was that it could only get worse as the case proceeds, once Bharara's office begins its prosecution for the alleged charges against Dr Khobragade, which, if proven, could result in 10 or five years imprisonment.
One way out for Dr Khobragade, a source acknowledged, may have been that once the State Department alerted the Indian embassy that action was imminent against her -- as the State Department claims it did -- for the diplomat to have immediately packed her bags "and gotten the hell out of the US."
According to this source, "In such a scenario, the case would have fallen flat, because can you imagine what India would have said if the US called for her extradition? They would have told the US to go take a hike."
Now that avenue is closed because Dr Khobragade has had to surrender her passport. Her travel within the US is restricted and permitted only with the court's prior approval.
 
Pakistan case was handled properly by the US government, US government apologize for the wrong doing and the lost of life, US paid 2 millions dollar blood money compensation allow by Pakistan law to free the US diplomat. Case close, he didn't convict by the crime. US didn't used their status in the world to illegally sneak out the diplomat back to the US.
Illegally sneak in or out again Pakistan will vouch for it or dead osama will.
 
lets c cuz she lied on visa application.?!? now you would say she is got immunity...a claim american officials disagree.

whatever both of us have known is through media...so it would be pretty immature to say you know who says truth and who lies.

she did not lie...as per India the maid lied as it was the maid who filed the application in the U.S Embassy
 
So they had the right to do what they did,then why all the problems between the US and India?

India want to change the rule. India is unilaterally giving her diplomatic immunity by transferring from the consulate to the UN. Its just happen that this princess committed her crime at the same city as UN so she has the luxury of just converting the location.

And even if UN agree with her conversion, she committed her crime while she still didn't have diplomatic immunity. She should still have to face her crime in the US courts.
 
@faithful guy considering that the diplomat is the one being humiliated for no reason we are of course angry about that. This does not mean that we don't care about the maid. It is not as simple as that. We are objecting to the lady's treatment. She didn't murder someone she simply underpaid someone. There are several cases in the US where even murderers don't get treated like this.

the counselor made an "mistake" and someone in US took advantage of it and sued her. it was stupid to treat her the way they did.
 
Back
Top Bottom