What's new

An Indo-Pak wrestling Final

Then you try to fake the ancient history. Here is the proof from ancient books of Indians, Greek, Arabs, Persians, Chinese to tell what was India. ;)
uttaraṃ yatsamudrasya himādreścaiva dakṣiṇam
varṣaṃ tadbhārataṃ nāma bhāratī yatra santatiḥ

उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।
"The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhāratam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata."

Here the things Greek wrote

"India then being four-sided in plan, the side which looks to the Orient and that to the South, the Great Sea compasseth; that towards the Arctic is divided by the mountain chain of Hēmōdus from Scythia, inhabited by that tribe of Scythians who are called Sakai; and on the fourth side, turned towards the West, the Indus marks the boundary, the biggest or nearly so of all rivers after the Nile."

Names of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I Agree but No Pakistani were ever called indian ever.
 
.
You never controlled present day Pakistan because all of the states were independent(Now don't post me the map of Ashoka empire as he again was a Pakistani)

Name me any single Indian from IVC?



If Pakistani doesn't identify themselves as indian but rather the people of IVC than they are under identity crisis

lol

Gandhara civilization was also pre-dominantly in Swat valley, North Punjab (Potohar plateau) etc.
Chanakya, the student and sage of Taxilla university in Punjab was also from this land;);). Remember, they'll confuse you about these simple things and won't come out in the open about it. This wouldn't have been the case had Pakistan not been formed. They would have openly admitted these things
 
.
You never controlled present day Pakistan because all of the states were independent(Now don't post me the map of Ashoka empire as he again was a Pakistani)

Name me any single Indian from IVC?



If Pakistani doesn't identify themselves as indian but rather the people of IVC than they are under identity crisis

lol

All these revisionist attempts will take you nowhere. Before you ask me to post about an Indian from IVC, how about naming a single Indian who called himself Pakistani prior to 1930??

We've always been politically divided. It's the cultural unity that kept the idea of India intact. North or South, we were Bharateeyas first and then a Mysorean or Hyderabadi or Junagadhi.

Forget IVC or Ashoka, at least, find one reference where Mohd Bin Qasim calls himself Pakistani. After all, your education set-up considers him to be the first Pakistani.
 
.
All these revisionist attempts will take you nowhere. Before you ask me to post about an Indian from IVC, how about naming a single Indian who called himself Pakistani prior to 1930??

We've always been politically divided. It's the cultural unity that kept the idea of India intact. North or South, we were Bharateeyas first and then a Mysorean or Hyderabadi or Junagadhi.

Forget IVC or Ashoka, at least, find one reference where Mohd Bin Qasim calls himself Pakistani. After all, your education set-up considers him to be the first Pakistani.

People might do but i don't consider MBQ as Pakistani or any Pakistani relation with arabs.

I have already explained you that Pakistani People history is the history of Pakistan as Pakistan is of Pakistani people.

Ok Find me any indian related to IVC?I can name PININI who was from Present day KPK or in Short Pakistan.Now find me any indian from IVC?tell me why is Rigveda considered as holybook when it is composed by Pakistanis?(Ancestors of Present day Pakistani people)
 
.
Someone is suffering from Mental-Disorder & Needs to Consult Psychiatrists! :sarcastic:
 
.
Gandhara civilization was also pre-dominantly in Swat valley, North Punjab (Potohar plateau) etc.
Chanakya, the student and sage of Taxilla university in Punjab was also from this land;);). Remember, they'll confuse you about these simple things and won't come out in the open about it. This wouldn't have been the case had Pakistan not been formed. They would have openly admitted these things

Yes chanakya was a yet another Pakistani responsible for founding the maurya empire

funny part is india now claim that they are the successor state of Maurya empire which was created by a Pakistani.

I must admit that since they don't have any of there own history,now they are hell bent on grabing our history but i know they will fail.
 
.
People might do but i don't consider MBQ as Pakistani or any Pakistani relation with arabs.

I have already explained you that Pakistani People history is the history of Pakistan as Pakistan is of Pakistani people.

Ok Find me any indian related to IVC?I can name PININI who was from Present day KPK or in Short Pakistan.Now find me any indian from IVC?tell me why is Rigveda considered as holybook when it is composed by Pakistanis?(Ancestors of Present day Pakistani people)

Who's Pinini? You can't even get Panini's name right, and yet you want to usurp his legacy.:lol:

Exactly, history of Pakistan is very short...whereas history of Indian people who were Pakistanized is pretty long. If you want the legacy, accept the whole package. No one else will entertain your selective interpretation of history.
 
.
Yes chanakya was a yet another Pakistani responsible for founding the maurya empire

funny part is india now claim that they are the successor state of Maurya empire which was created by a Pakistani.

I must admit that since they don't have any of there own history,now they are hell bent on grabing our history but i know they will fail.

Hehehehe, man you're good.
 
.
Gandhara civilization was also pre-dominantly in Swat valley, North Punjab (Potohar plateau) etc.
Chanakya, the student and sage of Taxilla university in Punjab was also from this land;);). Remember, they'll confuse you about these simple things and won't come out in the open about it. This wouldn't have been the case had Pakistan not been formed. They would have openly admitted these things

Gandhara was a region, not a civilization. Thoda dimag laga aur akalmand ban ja.

Ok Find me any indian related to IVC?I can name PININI who was from Present day KPK or in Short Pakistan.

Who is PININI. :o::o:
 
.
Gandhara was a region, not a civilization. Thoda dimag laga aur akalmand ban ja.



Who is PININI. :o::o:

Lol. I'm frankly not going to educate you. Gandhara IS THE NAME of a civilization. I know where you're trying to come from;) but your knowledge is half-assed.
 
.
Lol. I'm frankly not going to educate you. Gandhara IS THE NAME of a civilization. I know where you're trying to come from;) but your knowledge is half-assed.

Gandhara civilization is a fake terminology and sounds as much fake as Punjab civilization because both are the name of the regions. I know why such term popping up on the other side divine of Radcliffe line. :laughcry::laughcry:
 
Last edited:
.
Men Indians can't help themselves can they? Martial theory backfired and turned out 100% wrestlers are Indian jats, haryanvi jats barely make 20-25% of population in Haryana let alone whole India :rofl:

And Pakistanis find no shame in losing deliberately to honorary Pakis.

Gandhara civilization is a fake terminology and sounds as much fake as Punjab civilization because both are the name of the regions. I know why such term popping up on the other side divide of Radcliffe line. :laughcry::laughcry:

Bengali bc first you said punjabi hindus are products of rape and now punjab civilization does not exist?

Who's Pinini? You can't even get Panini's name right, and yet you want to usurp his legacy.:lol:

Exactly, history of Pakistan is very short...whereas history of Indian people who were Pakistanized is pretty long. If you want the legacy, accept the whole package. No one else will entertain your selective interpretation of history.

What will dravidian like you know anything about pure people? Why you guys don't take proud in Dravidian history? You being dravidian brahmin have proud history as well.

Panini was son of soil, and looked like one of us.
 
.
Men Indians can't help themselves can they? Martial theory backfired and turned out 100% wrestlers are Indian jats, haryanvi jats barely make 20-25% of population in Haryana let alone whole India :rofl:

And Pakistanis find no shame in losing deliberately to honorary Pakis.



Bengali bc first you said punjabi hindus are products of rape and now punjab civilization does not exist?



What will dravidian like you know anything about pure people? Why you guys don't take proud in Dravidian history? You being dravidian brahmin have proud history as well.

Panini was son of soil, and looked like one of us.
You do know that a South Indian wrestler is about to take Gold?

Yes chanakya was a yet another Pakistani responsible for founding the maurya empire

funny part is india now claim that they are the successor state of Maurya empire which was created by a Pakistani.

I must admit that since they don't have any of there own history,now they are hell bent on grabing our history but i know they will fail.
Maurya empire capital was in Bihar and Chabdragupta Maurya was Bihari lol
 
.
Men Indians can't help themselves can they? Martial theory backfired and turned out 100% wrestlers are Indian jats, haryanvi jats barely make 20-25% of population in Haryana let alone whole India :rofl:

And Pakistanis find no shame in losing deliberately to honorary Pakis.



Bengali bc first you said punjabi hindus are products of rape and now punjab civilization does not exist?



What will dravidian like you know anything about pure people? Why you guys don't take proud in Dravidian history? You being dravidian brahmin have proud history as well.

Panini was son of soil, and looked like one of us.

Define 'pure'.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom