What's new

Amit Shah’s political aim to recover Azad Kashmir is not backed by India’s military capacity

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
India’s military position
Given our limited technological military edge over Pakistan, we simply do not have the capacity to make major gains in Azad Kashmir in a limited war before the nuclear weapons come into play. But a J&K-centric limited war has always been on the radar of the Indian armed forces. We have the capacity to extend the LoC by 5-10 kms in selected areas in a 7-10-day limited war. And, this is what we should do at an opportune time to make our intent credible.

With respect to the recovery of Aksai Chin, given China’s overwhelming military and technological edge, we can do little more than maintain a firm stand. Also, due to China’s high stakes in CPEC, major operations launched by India in ‘Azad Kashmir’ and/or Gilgit-Baltistan will force Beijing to open a second front anywhere along the LAC.

Notwithstanding the Shia-Sunni divide in Gilgit-Baltistan, religion binds the people of Azad Kashmir to Pakistan. The unrest stems from a long-standing demand for autonomy. In the long-term, it will be worthwhile for India to exploit these fault lines in the pursuit of national interests.
https://theprint.in/opinion/modi-go...plomacy-but-wont-mean-much-militarily/293751/
 
. .
This retired phuddu sikh is telling the truth. Though he forget to mention that India already actively try their best for unrest in AJK and GB but they find little backers there. Few years ago dozens of terrorists were arrested in GB. While in IoK Pakistan doesn't even have to do anything.
 
Last edited:
.
.
Which technological edge are they now even bragging about? Did we not show them their technological edge on 27th Feb? They were all over the place on that day.
 
.
Which technological edge are they now even bragging about? Did we not show them their technological edge on 27th Feb? They were all over the place on that day.

He admit that India doesn't have any edge. This is interesting shift because pre 27 FEB gangus fooled the world that they were military power capable of conquering Pakistan anytime it wishes if it wasn't for nukes. Even many fools in Pakistan also believed that.

Said this Pakistan taking IoK is also not likely. But difference is their advantage in number is ridiculous. Their airforce budget is larger then combined defence budget of Pakistan.
 
.
Apnay iok kee fikr kro lest they lose a part of it. Which is more likely under the circumstances.
 
.
He admit that India doesn't have any edge. This is interesting shift because pre 27 FEB gangus fooled the world that they were military power capable of conquering Pakistan anytime it wishes if it wasn't for nukes. Even many fools in Pakistan also believed that.

Said this Pakistan taking IoK is also not likely. But difference is their advantage in number is ridiculous. Their airforce budget is larger then combined defence budget of Pakistan.
Indian policy is : best defense is bullsh!t.
 
.
India’s military position
Given our limited technological military edge over Pakistan, we simply do not have the capacity to make major gains in Azad Kashmir in a limited war before the nuclear weapons come into play. But a J&K-centric limited war has always been on the radar of the Indian armed forces. We have the capacity to extend the LoC by 5-10 kms in selected areas in a 7-10-day limited war. And, this is what we should do at an opportune time to make our intent credible.

With respect to the recovery of Aksai Chin, given China’s overwhelming military and technological edge, we can do little more than maintain a firm stand. Also, due to China’s high stakes in CPEC, major operations launched by India in ‘Azad Kashmir’ and/or Gilgit-Baltistan will force Beijing to open a second front anywhere along the LAC.

Notwithstanding the Shia-Sunni divide in Gilgit-Baltistan, religion binds the people of Azad Kashmir to Pakistan. The unrest stems from a long-standing demand for autonomy. In the long-term, it will be worthwhile for India to exploit these fault lines in the pursuit of national interests.
https://theprint.in/opinion/modi-go...plomacy-but-wont-mean-much-militarily/293751/

Sanghis don't care about military capacity or capability.

Their statements are for the Indian voters not Pakistanis.

As long as the gullible Indian voters believe them they have achieved their goal.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom