What's new

American hunts down Markhor in Chitral using a bow

American hunts down Markhor in Chitral using a bow


The US-based hunter paid $80,000 or Rs17.12 million to K-P wildlife dept as permit fee; '80% to be given to community'


Ihsan Dawar
December 25, 2020

photo wildlifeofpakistan





ABOTTABAD: An American citizen named Joseph Bradford was reported on Friday to have hunted down a Markhor in Chitral. using the traditional method of archery.

According to the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) wildlife department, Bradford successfully targeted the Markhor in the Toshi area of Chitral. The horns of the hunted animal were measured at 40 inches.

The US hunter paid $80,000 or Rs17.12 million for the trophy-hunting permit and this was for the first time that the hunter used an arrow and a bow to hunt an animal.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's chief conservator Dr Muhsin Farooq told The Express Tribune that 80 percent of the money shall be distributed among the local community, and will be of "help in conserving the wildlife in the region".

Dr Farooq added that years ago when they had started the hunting trophy programme, the population of the Markhor was estimated at around only 900. However, it has now crossed 5,000 in Chitral and Kohistan, he claimed.

The chief conservator said they have submitted a proposal to the federal government to demand an increase in the number of hunting trophy permits ashe population of the Markhor has been increasing.

He said the money collected through permit fees can help the local community in protecting the endangered animals in their localities.

Markhor-hunting commonly takes place in Pakistan around this season. The permit fee paid by hunters is normally used to conserve the population of the species that has been listed in the IUCN Red List as Near Threatened since 2015.

Last year, the season’s first markhor was hunted in Skardu town of Gilgit-Baltistan by an Italian hunter named Carlo Pasco.

According to the G-B wildlife department, Pasco successfully hunted a flared-horned markhor from the Skardu conservation area managed by the local community and forest department jointly.

The hunter had paid $85,000 as permit fee for hunting a markhor in the region.

wildlife being killed for dollars to preserve wildlife :D:D:D:D:D
 
.
Instead of mocking folks for not eating beef or eating swine, can we settle for sheep head instead?

🙂 🙂 🙂


 
.
Instead of mocking folks for not eating beef or eating swine, can we settle for sheep head instead?

🙂 🙂 🙂


Thats not an uncommon sight in almost every country.

Humans rarely waste meat.
 
. .
Americans, Germans and many others love to hunt. Guess, they are hunters, like Easu. Think that Joe Biden's son is named Hunter so like guess he is like Easu also. That probably bodes badly for the USA and good for people not associated with hunting.
 
.
Why kill the poor animal using a bow and make it suffer?? Why the F* not shoot the poor animal so it suffers less?? I might be asking for too much here. When humans are killed like animals in this country, then poor innocent animals have no chance.
 
.
Trophy hunting is great and it is one of reason that Markhor Population have increased significantly in Pakistan
> They choose very old animal to hunt
> Customer get only few shots (if he misses it than he have to pay more amount for shots)
> Amount goes to community and preservation
 
.
happy hunting as long as $$$ is coming in.


I have no problem with hunting as long as that is sustainable.
All good hunters will take it as a matter of pride that they make a good kill that minimise the suffering to their target be it with bow or rifle.

And that the hunting benefit the people staying in that region with the prey being hunted.
That will encourage the folks staying there to take care of those animals to ensure hunting can be
done to the time of their grand children and beyond.

Take a look at this stoppage of all hunting of Congo African Greys by making that totally illegal.

Did the Congo African Greys benefited?


Partial plagiarisation

**********************************

Bird born in captivity & 353 heads // Meet Jackie
6217929
shanlungOctober 14th, 2011
.

In my reports of Oberon, Ketile in a French forum http://www.perroquet.biz read of my difficulties and asked
"As a friend, wouldn't it be easier to find a bird born in captivity ??"

Ketile meant well. When I wrote my report " To Shanlung - How to do Free Flight Outside ", I mentioned that started
at a French forum. Ketile asked me then that question, and which lead to my report.

This question can be seen from two main different angles.

Angle 1

You all knew I had relationships with wild birds in the first place.

Riamfada was a wild caught CAG as seen in her open leg ring. She was a rescue and given to my charge when she was about 5-6 years old. She came to me bitey and fearful.

P1180825

In about a year, she was doing free flights to me.

IMG_3035

Yingshiong above is a white rumped shama. A shama is a songbird. He was caught from the wild at about 3 years old. He was given into my charge at about 5 years old. He flew to me on cue within a month of coming to me. Breeders of shamas told me even their breed shamas , some they hand raised, never ever landed on them. They told me above was the first ever they seen of a male shama landing on a human.

IMG_3030

Libai is a Greater Greenleaf song bird. Caught from the wild and probably about 3 years old or so when he came to me.

Even wild caught and old birds can be so easily trained and bonded if you know how.

Understanding them is the first and most important step that can be taken.
That is the most fundamental truth in looking after birds.

One do not need a young bird be the bird from breeder or anywhere else.

If one start on this route, where will that end?
Getting younger birds?
Getting handfed birds?
Getting baby birds?
With eyes still closed?

That we get them young to imprint them that they are humans and not birds so they interact better with us?
Getting very young birds apparently caused much problems with the birds when they are older.
I wrote on this problem in
Imprinting of birds
http://shanlung.livejournal.com/130187.html

I think it is far better to let the young birdie remain with their birdie parents.
For them to know that they are birdies.

Oberon was different. When I first took him in, my main thought then was to return him back to where I felt he belonged. And I think that affected my mindset towards him. His acting as if I was the fearful bogeyman , that I dared not even change the newspapers catching his pooping for the two months he was with me.

IMG_4184

Oberon -Returning him to the realm of Fairy Queens
http://shanlung.livejournal.com/132128.html
It was so painful at the point of his release when he only flew that 5 meters to the edge of the forest and perched there to look back at me instead of flying non stop into the forest as I thought he would.

That perhaps the relationship between Oberon and myself had actually started but with my main thoughts of returning him back prevented me from recognising that in the first place.

I do not have that idyllic vision that back to the wild is paradise for wild birds. As sadly, whatever is left of the wild is only a shadow of the original primordial forest.. And even if it was the original primordial forest, that still can be paradise, or can be hell. It is a struggle of survival of the fittest, a struggle for life and death.

When I cleaned the flight room, I found many flight feathers that he molted. Those flight feathers had been clipped. Which explained why Oberon could not fly the first couple of days. It was not just that he needed to rebuilt his flight muscles. In his two months with me, I returned to him the gift of flight. And helped him build up muscles and fat reserves.

I gained too. From having such a beautiful bird like the Asian fairy bluebird living with me and having his beauty and pleasure of his company for a while. And he did land on me as chronicled in the photos. You all have seen a bird which otherwise you all would never have seen or even know about.

I learned too. That perhaps having a treat might not be all that important for clicker training even if I had not proceeded with that phase with Oberon. Relationship is far more important. After all, Tinkerbell, Riamfada tend to take and threw away my sunflower seeds when I offered it to them. Yingshiong, even when allowed free feeding of millis, would still harassed me for training as if the millis from my hand mattered more than the millis left for him in open box in his room. And none of them flew to my wife who tried to bribe them shamelessly and they flew to me even though it was clear the treat box was with my wife and I had empty hands.

Angle 2

Should wild caught birds even be bought at all?

Should not wild birds be allowed to remain in the wild and not captured by anyone at all?

But to do that, the parrots and birds and beasties must have the original primordial lands that they were in. But sadly most of the decline in the numbers came because of the loss of their habitat as man encroached into their areas.

There is this saying that when the buying stop, the selling will stop too.

At one time, I fully subscribed to this school of thought as I thought then that if no wild birds were bought , they then can continue to live their lives in the way that they should and live happily ever after.

Then an article I read compelled me to a major rethink and to write of that in June 2009 in
Are we helping the wild greys by banning all imports of them?
http://shanlung.livejournal.com/101312.html

The article written by Dave Harcourt is here
http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/25/smuggler-caught-with-heads-of-353-african-gray-parrots/

That as there is a total ban on any wild caught african greys, the value of the greys in their original land become the meat on their bodies and cooking pot. The heads have little meat and then sold which was why that smuggler was caught with a bag stuffed with the heads of 353 african greys.

I realised then I could hardly blame the poor Africans trying to make their living farming and with African greys probably eating their crops. In the past, they could catch and sell the parrots.

I thought back to myself when I was living in Oman with Riamfada. In my garden then, I grew sunflower plants. And beautiful IRNs would fly in to eat the heads of the sunflower plants.

P1140279
Above was one of the IRNs on my sunflower plants.
I even accepted that at first.
Until I discovered Riamfada loved the sunflower seeds in the dried heads of the sunflowers

IMG_1338

IMG_1342

P1160601

Video of Riam chewing on the head



And I loved to see Riam digging those seeds out one by one even though I had loads of store bought sunflower seeds.

If the IRNs continued to be allowed to eat the seeds in the developing heads off my plants, there would be none left for Riamfada.

I tied plastic bags around the developing heads of my sunflower plants to prevent the IRNs from eating the heads so the heads could ripened.

I tried to return some of those heads back to the wild IRNs on a basket later hoisted high up out of reach of my kitties.
And even added store bought sunflower seeds into that basket as well.

P1140274

The IRNs did not go to that basket.
The wild IRNs flew in to the sunflower plants still wanting to eat the developing heads.

And I did not remove the plastic bags around the developing heads.

If any of you were in my position, would you allow those IRNs to get to those developing heads?
To sacrifice the happiness of your own grey and feed your grey only with store bought sunflower seeds and let the IRNs have the developing heads of the sunflowers?

Then you are a far better man than myself. I could not do that even though I loved those IRNs.

And that was not even a matter of life and death for me or Riamfada. After all, Riam did not even need any sunflower seeds. It was more for my , and her esoteric pleasure in digging those seeds out of the heads.

What if I was a poor African farmer and I need my crops to feed myself and my family which are being eaten by African greys? In the past where perhaps I could sell the greys I caught , I might let them live to be caught. And if I can no longer do that since wild caughts are all banned, I probably be compelled to kill the greys to save my crops and eat them.

And sell the heads.

And please do not blame the African farmers. We want coffee and more coffee. So more forest are cut to grow coffee beans. Or we want beef or pork or chicken. And another part of the forest got cut to turn into grass land or to grow soy beans for the cattle or pigs or chicken. We poisoned our Earth with CO2 causing drought or flood and more forest had to be cut for them to grow their crops.

One need not even be a poor African farmer.

One can be a rich Australian farmer. Where 95% of the original forest and grassland of Australia are now taken over from the local flora and fauna and turned into fruit plantations, sugar cane plantations, grassland for sheeps and suburbs and houses and roads and playgrounds.

No trapping of wild birds are allowed in Australia.
But can the remaining fragmented 5% of the original land support all the wild beasties and birdies?
But if the lorikeets and cockatoos from Major Mitchells to Galahs to Blacks to Ganggangs to Sulphur Cresteds are caught eating the fruits of your fruit trees, you can shoot and kill them all.

They need only to bury the bodies quietly in the field somewhere.
I guess they just cannot sell the heads.

Or the lorikeets and other birds can starve to death as can be read in this article.
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2011/09/22/3323483.htm
Rainbow lorikeets are becoming less common on the Gold Coast, as development takes away their habitat and food sources.

I do want wild birds and parrots to live, to truly live in the wild.

I do not believe a total ban on selling of wild birds will help them to live.

Only if their value can be recognised and accepted as a sustained resource to be treasured by the people living with the wild birds that only then the birds can continue to live in the wild.

For that to happen, there must be market for wild caught birds, caught and sold in a sustained way that they can continue to live in the wild.

But an unholy alliance of breeders stopped that. So they can sell their captive breds without the market being upset by wild caughts. And they created a movement to totally ban wild caughts as if they have a true interest in protecting the parrots in the wild. People who meant well, which included me in the past, jumped on and joined them all in declaring wild caughts are immoral and must be totally stopped.

Joining those NO WILD CAUGHTS campaign will make you feel good inside.
Will that do any good for the wild birds to be caught for the pot or just shot and buried in an unmarked hole in the fields of Australia farmland or fruit plantations?

While those breeders laughed all the way to their banks. Do think about that the next time you are asked to support a cause against wild caughts. And asked to give them money so that they can continue lobbying against wild caughts.

Even the bred parrots and birds came from original wild caughts.

Without those wild caughts from which my Tinkerbell was bred from, and who ignited in me a realisation how precious birds can be, the ShanLung that you know would never have existed.

Would I be writing the way I am writing on birdies and beasties if I had not have Tinkerbell in my life?
No, I probably would not.

Would I have become a life member of Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust with no Tinkerbell in my life?
No, I probably would not.

1609298659807.png
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom