it's one thing to be killed by your enemy, it's totally another thing to be killed by your ally. And not at one occassion but at multiple occassions, this being the most brutal one.
Regardless of what you think that Pak army's position is becoming weaker, there are reports emerging from the western media highlighting us/nato's complicit or irrisponsible role in this strike.
See iPhone, I have not ever talked about whether NATO attack was a deliberate action, or just a mistake.
I am trying to put forth a point that does not go along with the sentiments of the majority in here.
Having cleared that, I want you to consider this: In what war, have there not been casualties resulting from friendly fires?
The NATO may be complicit, may be incompetent, irresponsible, or anything you say. But tell me honestly, have we seen the Army taking actions of similar magnitude against the terrorists, apart from relying mostly on drone attacks?
The Taliban regime was not brought down by drones, or incessant bombings. The Taliban regime fell flat right after the fuel supply to Afghanistan was blocked from Pakistani side.
Pakistan is making exactly the same move against NATO forces. It has not only blocked the NATO supplies, but has
also blocked the commercial fuel supply to Afghanistan, lest the NATO shall buy any fuel from within Afghanistan.
Such ingenious, and courageous actions on part of the Army were not to be seen throughout the years of WoT.
Who do you think needed continuous supply of fuel and fertilizers in the FATA area more, the general public living on bare necessities, or the full-tank Prado driving extremist Mullahs and their fertilizer laden buildings housed with their bomb engineers?
I am just making a comparison here ya know, between the actions of the Army against enemies of Pakistan in the past, and actions of the Army against the enemies of Pakistan at present.
The seriousness shown by the Army at this hour, was nowhere to be seen in the past when the toll was much, much higher.