What's new

American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

Here I just say "Offense is a better defence".

A military offense? Against who? I do not think that would be wise at this stage.

Political and military contacts and negotiations might prove more fruitful.
 
. .
news reports are not all nato supply are close. So just to fool ppl of Pakistan and creat some hype they have made this story.
 
.
Pakistan blocks NATO Afghan supplies after fatal air strike




YAKKAGHUND, Pakistan (Reuters) - NATO helicopters attacked a military checkpoint in northwest Pakistan on Saturday, killing up to 25 troops and prompting Pakistan to shut the vital supply route for NATO troops fighting in Afghanistan, Pakistani officials said.

The attack comes as relations between the United States and Pakistan, its ally in the war on terror, are already badly strained following the killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden by U.S. special forces in a secret raid on the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad in May.

Pakistan called that raid a flagrant violation of its sovereignty.

A Pakistani military spokesman confirmed Saturday's pre-dawn cross-border attack in the tribal region of Mohmand and said casualties had been reported, but gave no details.

"NATO helicopters carried out an unprovoked and indiscriminate firing on a Pakistani check post in Mohmand agency, casualties have been reported and details are awaited," the spokesman told Reuters.

Two military officials said that up to 25 Pakistani troops had been killed and 14 wounded in the attack on the Salala check post, about 2.5 km (1.5 miles) from the Afghan border.

"We have heard about heavy casualties but can't provide you with the exact number of casualties of our troops as the post is far away, located in the mountains and is difficult to reach at the moment," a military spokesman in Peshawar said.

The attack took place around 2 a.m. (2100 GMT) in the Baizai area of Mohmand, where Pakistani troops are fighting Taliban militants.

Another senior Pakistani military officer said efforts were under way to bring the bodies of the slain soldiers to Ghalanai, the headquarters of Mohmand tribal region.

"The latest attack by NATO forces on our post will have serious repercussions as they without any reasons attacked on our post and killed soldiers asleep," he said, requesting anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

About 40 Pakistani army troops were stationed at the outpost, military sources said. Two officers were reported among the dead.

NATO supply trucks and fuel tankers bound for Afghanistan were stopped at Jamrud town in the Khyber tribal region near the city of Peshawar hours after the raid, officials said.

"We have halted the supplies and some 40 tankers and trucks have been returned from the check post in Jamrud," Mutahir Zeb, a senior government official, told Reuters.

Another official said the supplies had been stopped for security reasons.

Pakistan is a vital land route for 49 percent of NATO's supplies to its troops in Afghanistan, a NATO spokesman said.

A spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Kabul said the coalition there was aware of "an incident" and was gathering more information.

The incident occurred a day after U.S. General John Allen met Pakistani Army Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani to discuss border control and enhanced cooperation.

The Afghanistan-Pakistan border is often poorly marked, and differs between maps by up to five miles in some places.

A similar incident on Sept 30, 2009, which killed two Pakistani troops, led to the closure of one of NATO's supply routes through Pakistan for 10 days.

NATO apologized for that incident, which it said happened when NATO gunships mistook warning shots by the Pakistani forces for a militant attack.

The attack is expected to further worsen U.S.-Pakistan relations, already at one of their lowest points in history, following a tumultuous year that saw the bin Laden raid, the jailing of a CIA contractor, and U.S. accusations that Pakistan backed a militant attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

An increase in U.S. drone strikes on militants in the last few years has also irritated Islamabad, which says the campaign kills more Pakistani civilians in the border area than activists. Washington disputes that, but declines to discuss the drone campaign in detail.

"This is an attack on Pakistan's territorial sovereignty," said Masood Kasur, the governor of Pakistan's northwestern Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province.

"Such cross-border attacks cannot be tolerated any more. The government will take up this matter at the highest level and it will be investigated."

(Additional reporting by Saud Mehsud and Jibran Ahmad; Writing by Augustine Anthony and Chris Allbritton; Editing by Nick Macfie)

WOW what kinda ally they are????? :blink:
 
.
The day you compare India to NATO you have already lost the battle.

Possible nuclear war is the worst scenario. And if "sane" Indians have no problem with it then I as an "insane" Pakistani also can follow the same line.
 
.
I can see the Indians wetting themselves of a prospect of an open confrontation between Pakistan & the US. There will be no such thing, both countries need each other to a large degree, & in case of an open confrontation, India (& the whole region) would be affected devastatingly.

india dont want any war in region and you people brought them in not us.;)
 
.
oohh mee khuda ths idiot brainwashed kid,

please just answer me y is your dear NATO losing so many lives in afghanistan and losing a war there, and how is talibans punishing your soldiers in afghanistan by shooting a chinook with an RPG

you are not even winning against stone age people, how can you overcome pakistan army??

keeping aside your brave airforce which you think can easily bring down pakistan, pakistan unlike afghaistan has an airforce which can answer any of your retarded air aggression

the so called superior technology cant win a war in stone age afghanistan, your superior technology cant safeguard your arse during 9/11 how can your superior arse can protect you from the hell, you dont even have superior techno arse in big numbers to protect your superior techno arse

war is lost its time to pack bags and go back home and enjoy mcdonalds in your retirement

let me telling your superior techno arse y r u losing,

you are not even guarding your border against enemy, you are not even guarding your borders properly, you are letting anti pakistani talibans to kill our people, you are just a group of rag tag gangsters, your gangsters from LA street are being recruited to fight this shitty war, we want your gangsters to be taken away immeditely

and further you need to beg china to carry on this war, trillions of dollars, i hope your daddy is not funding trillion dollars for this war

you have trillion dollar depts to china, every born americn is thousands of dollars indebted to china, your economy is running out, you are jobless in your own country now, poverty is increasing and you are talking about your superior technology, shame on yourself
It's like you've had a mental breakdown whilst writing that. Perhaps some chill out time?
 
.
A military offense? Against who? I do not think that would be wise at this stage.

Political and military contacts and negotiations might prove more fruitful.

Yeah political and military negotiations are more "fruitful". At least 28 won't be killed next time. We would suffice with one or two. :)
 
.
Possible nuclear war is the worst scenario. And if "sane" Indians have no problem with it then I as an "insane" Pakistani also can follow the same line.
living the life of an everyday afghani will be worst case with mullahs taking over pak after US defangs the nukes. Life in pak will be miserable with taliban sharia laws. trust me.. thats worst case
 
.
I was reading this and had to register to ask why posters are so defeatist? NATO is not in a good place strategically it has 130000 troops dispersed across Afghanistan, from different nationalities,and without proper resupply if Pakistan mobilizes it's armed forces I'm pretty sure they could quickly overrun the isolated NATO forces and escort them out of Afghanistan.Blitzkrieg NATO would run out of ammunition in days.But it all depends on what the Pakistani military/political leadership decides to do I don't think it would be a one sides confrontation. Certainly Pakistan might suffer heavy causalities in the initial assault but as shown by the Soviets during WW2 and Chinese in the Korean war you could overrun even the most superior firepower through numbers.And again they have no resupply it would be over in a week they would simply have no ammunition left.And the Chinese fought the entire UN not even just NATO and the UN had a lot more forces and proper resupply.Pakistan should think of it's strategic interests the future is in an alliance with China. NATO simply doesn't belong in the region and will eventually leave anyway.Their presence is only temporary.
 
. .
Here is the interesting bit:

Pak summons US envoy over NATO attack

In the latest blow to US-Pak relationship, a NATO helicopter has fired on two Pakistani border checkpoints killing 25 soldiers including 2 officers. Pakistan has responded by summoning the US envoy to Pakistan to lodge a strong protest with the NATO and shut the Torkham border crossing to NATO. The border crossing is a key supply route for NATO.

Reports indicate that the two border posts which were attacked by the NATO helicopters, were a 100 ft apart. A statement from the Pakistani military blamed NATO copters for carrying out “unprovoked and indiscriminate firing.”

The attacked checkpoints were set up recently to stop Pakistani Taliban from attacking the Pakistani forces from across the border. Pakistan has criticized Afghan security forces saying they have not done enough to stop the attacks.

US-Pak relationship has been going downhill ever since US launched a covert operation to kill Osama bin Laden in Abbotabad without telling Pakistani authorities.

The two sides have been engaged in a war of words that have only escalated in recent months. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen had accused Pakistan of covertly supporting militants who have been attacking NATO forces in Afghanistan.

He said Pakistan has either been supporting these militants directly or has been turning a blind eye to militants who launch attacks from its territories. The US has also been talking about an inordinate amount of fire from the Pakistani side which have been landing near the NATO security forces. The US has also assembled a large amount of troops and heavy weaponry near the border with Pakistan, prompting fears that it wanted to invade the Pakistani North West where militants are supposed to be based.

Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani warned that US should think ’10 times’ before launching an operation on Pakistani soil. Keeping up the pressure from the US side, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her visit to Islamabad warned Pakistan of the dangers of keeping ‘snakes in the backyard.’

This latest incident seems to be a virtual rewind of the similar incident about a year ago which has resulted in the deaths of two Pakistani soldiers. Then too Pakistan had shut down Torkham, and had demanded a US apology. The border crossing was only reopened when the US formally apologized.

This time the incident is much more deadly, and comes in the wake of already strained relations.
 
.
LOL its NATO who attacked Pakistani, better don't bring India into this. Thanks in advance.
 
. .
news reports are not all nato supply are close. So just to fool ppl of Pakistan and creat some hype they have made this story.

Yeah! they are fooling us in much the same way as Imran's Dharna in Karachi to suspend NATO supply lines.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom