American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

[CorporateAffairs]

All explanations are BS. It is intentionally done.

With loads and loads of technology, how can abyone mistake Pak army with that of Taliban or terrorists. It is pur BS.

May RIP all my pak brothers killed in the barbaric attack.

 

[Agni5000]

I'm not pronouncing any verdicts, just the facts. NATO helicopters (not the Afghan troops) crossed 2.5kms into Pakistani territory & attacked 2 separate military posts, killing 24 people. Yet, you keep on insisting that Afghan troops crossed into Pakistani territory, when this was not the case.

Who knows they crossed or not. Boarder is not properly demarcated.

 

[53fd]

Who knows they crossed or not. Boarder is not properly demarcated.

Please support your claim with evidence from any source. There is no narrative that says that.

 

[Bhairava]

Why are you inventing stories that Afghan troops crossed into Pakistani territory as well, when this was not the case?

No one knows for sure what's the case, yet

Already NATO sources have started saying this was an act of self-defence after provocatory fire from Pakistani posts.

"They were fired on from a Pakistani army base," the Western official in Kabul said. "It was a defensive action."

(Post # 1735).

 

[53fd]

No one knows what's the case, yet

Already NATO sources have said this was an act of self-defence after provocatory fire from Pakistani posts. (Post # 1735).

And the contradictions in their claims have been exposed. Btw, the NATO sources said that the Afghan troops were conducting operations in the border regions of Eastern Afghanistan, not Pakistan.

 

[Agni5000]

Please support your claim with evidence from any source. There is no narrative that says that.

Do you believe if they narrate? NATO saying they acted on self defense. Why are you not believing it?

 

[Bhairava]

And the contradictions in their claims have been exposed. Btw, the NATO sources said that the Afghan troops were conducting operations in the border regions of Eastern Afghanistan, not Pakistan.

They said "close to poorly de-marcated border". Enough leeway for the future.

BTW this is what a Western official claims -

"They were fired on from a Pakistani army base," the Western official in Kabul said. "It was a defensive action."

(Post # 1735).

 

[53fd]

No one knows for sure what's the case, yet

Already NATO sources have started saying this was an act of self-defence after provocatory fire from Pakistani posts.



(Post # 1735).

One of the NATO source says that there was an ongoing operation against militants in Eastern Afghanistan, that Pakistan were notified of it beforehand, & that the attack on the military posts (2.5kms inside Pakistani territory) was accidental, because of the poor demarcation in the border region.

The other NATO source says there was firing from a Pakistani army base (2.5km inside Pakistani territory) into Afghanistan, & that it was a defensive action.

Which one was it?

---------- Post added at 11:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 AM ----------

One of the NATO source says that there was an ongoing operation against militants in Eastern Afghanistan, that Pakistan were notified of it beforehand, & that the attack on the military posts (2.5kms inside Pakistani territory) was accidental, because of the poor demarcation in the border region.

The other NATO source says there was firing from a Pakistani army base (2.5km inside Pakistani territory) into Afghanistan, & that it was a defensive action.

Which one was it?

Btw, neither account says Afghan troops crossed into Pakistani territory like you said.

 

[Bhairava]

One of the NATO source says that there was an ongoing operation against militants in Eastern Afghanistan, that Pakistan were notified of it beforehand, & that the attack on the military posts (2.5kms inside Pakistani territory) was accidental, because of the poor demarcation in the border region.

The other NATO source says there was firing from a Pakistani army base (2.5km inside Pakistani territory) into Afghanistan, & that it was a defensive action.

Which one was it?

I have already explained how the two are not self-contradictory.

BTW instead of asking me, why don't you wait for the official investigation to conclude and the report be submitted, as I have been saying from the very beginning.

---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------

Btw, neither account says Afghan troops crossed into Pakistani territory like you said.

Does not say...as of now.

 

[Peshwa]

One of the NATO source says that there was an ongoing operation against militants in Eastern Afghanistan, that Pakistan were notified of it beforehand, & that the attack on them was accidental, because of the poor demarcation in the border region.

The other NATO source says there was firing from a Pakistani army base (2.5km inside Pakistani territory) into Afghanistan, & that it was a defensive action.

Which one was it?

Connect the bloody dots already....

An operation against militants in E. Afg cud have led to incursions by Afghan forces into Pak territory due to poorly demarcated border region.
Firing from Pak army bases to prevent incursions (or to provide cover to militants, a less popular theory here) resulted in the afghan forces calling for air support.
Air support caused casualties...

everything is speculation from what ive read, No party is willing to concede or take blame.... so the wait and watch game is probably what we should be playing....

All theories just yet, unless I missed some key piece of news....

 

[53fd]

I have already explained how the two are not self-contradictory.

They are contradictory. One account says this was an act of 'defense', the other says it was 'hot pursuit'. Hot pursuit indicates attack mode, whereas 'defense' indicates defensive mode. Hence, they are contradictory.

Btw, neither account says Afghan troops crossed into Pakistani territory like you said.

 

[bdslph]

15 days Pakistan should had said within 24 hours i hate what NATO / AMERICAN did

 

[regular]

Aryan, in every other post of yours you speak of Americas impending doom, bankruptcy, death, destruction etc. Why,therefore would they now risk another conflict with Pakistan?

Sir! the war with Pakistan will be funded by the Federal reseves and they just paid 2.5 Trillion US dollars to the US Govt to start this war. Cuz they just paid the US Govt for their debt 2.5Trillion$$ in August when they had financial problem to run the Govt and U know who is Federal reserves of the US??? It is the private governing body that prints the $$$ out of nowhere and just lends it to the US govt if they need them. It is totally run by the Zionist Lobby who are totally warmongorers and Luciferians/Anti-Christ pplz. They are directing US govt and the Pentagon what to do in the world.The white house is totally under their control and fully under the debt of the Federal Reserves.....

 

[53fd]

Connect the bloody dots already....

An operation against militants in E. Afg cud have led to incursions by Afghan forces into Pak territory due to poorly demarcated border region.

The operations were taking place against militants inside Afghan (Eastern Afghanistan) territory, not Pakistan. There were no Afghan forces that crossed Pakistani territory, only NATO helicopters. If the Afghan troops with their human eyes know where the border is, but the NATO Forces with their night vision cannot do so, that is not possible. The Afghan forces could not have known that Pakistani military posts were firing into Afghanistan from 2.5kms inside Pakistan. It is also not scientifically possible for Pakistani military posts to fire into Afghanistan 2.5kms inside Pakistan.

 

[bdslph]

Pakistan KICK THE AMERICAN OUT PLS

they dont respect us Muslims now believe what we had to sacrifice , for them