What's new

Allied Militants Threaten Pakistan’s Populous Heart

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
DERA GHAZI KHAN, Pakistan — Taliban insurgents are teaming up with local militant groups to make inroads in Punjab, the province that is home to more than half of Pakistanis, reinvigorating an alliance that Pakistani and American authorities say poses a serious risk to the stability of the country.

The deadly assault in March in Lahore, Punjab’s capital, against the Sri Lankan cricket team, and the bombing last fall of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, the national capital, were only the most spectacular examples of the joint campaign, they said.

Now police officials, local residents and analysts warn that if the government does not take decisive action, these dusty, impoverished fringes of Punjab could be the next areas facing the insurgency. American intelligence and counterterrorism officials also said they viewed the developments with alarm.

“I don’t think a lot of people understand the gravity of the issue,” said a senior police official in Punjab, who declined to be idenfitied because he was discussing threats to the state. “If you want to destabilize Pakistan, you have to destabilize Punjab.”

As American drone attacks disrupt strongholds of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the tribal areas, the insurgents are striking deeper into Pakistan — both in retaliation and in search of new havens.

Telltale signs of creeping militancy abound in a belt of towns and villages near here that a reporter visited last week. Militants have gained strength considerably in the district of Dera Ghazi Khan, which is a gateway both to Taliban-controlled areas and the heart of Punjab, the police and local residents say. Many were terrified.

Some villages, just north of here, are so deeply infiltrated by militants that they are already considered no-go zones by their neighbors.

In at least five towns in southern and western Punjab, including the midsize hub of Multan, barber shops, music stores and Internet cafes offensive to the militants’ strict interpretation of Islam have received threats. Traditional ceremonies that include drumming and dancing have been halted in some areas. Hard-line ideologues have addressed large crowds to push their idea of Islamic revolution. Sectarian attacks, dormant here since the 1990s, have erupted once again.

“It’s going from bad to worse,” said a senior police official in Dera Ghazi Khan. “They are now more active. These are the facts.”

American officials agreed. Bruce Riedel, who led the Obama administration’s recently completed strategy review of Pakistan and Afghanistan, said the Taliban now had “extensive links into the Punjab.”

“You are seeing more of a coalescence of these militant groups,” said Mr. Riedel, a former C.I.A. official. “Connections that have always existed are becoming tighter and more public than they have in the past.”

The Punjabi militant groups have had links with the Taliban, who are mostly Pashtun tribesmen, since the 1980s. Some of the Punjabi groups are veterans of Pakistan’s state-sponsored insurgency against Indian forces in Kashmir. Others made targets of Shiites.

Under pressure from the United States, former President Pervez Musharraf cut back state support for the Punjabi groups. They either went underground or migrated to the tribal areas, where they deepened their ties with the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

At least 20 militants killed in American strikes in the tribal areas since last summer were Punjabi, according to people from the tribal areas and Pakistani officials. One Pakistani security official estimated that 5 percent to 10 percent of militants in the tribal regions could be Punjabi.

The alliance is based on more than shared ideology. “These are tactical alliances,” said a senior American counterterrorism official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss intelligence matters. The Pashtun Taliban and Arab militants, who are part of Al Qaeda, have money, sanctuary, training sites and suicide bombers. The Punjabi militants can provide logistical help in Punjabi cities, like Lahore, including handling bombers and target reconnaissance.

The cooperation between the groups intensified greatly after the government’s siege of Islamic hard-liners at the Red Mosque in Islamabad, in mid-2007, Pakistani and American security officials say. The siege has since become a rallying cry.

One such joint operation, an American security official said, was the Marriott bombing in Islamabad in September, which killed more than 50 people.

As this cooperation intensifies, places like Dera Ghazi Khan are particularly vulnerable. This frontier town is home to a combustible mix of worries: poverty, a growing phalanx of hard-line religious schools and a uranium processing plant that is a part of Pakisitan’s nuclear program.

It is also strategically situated at the intersection of two main roads. One is a main artery into Pakistan’s heartland, in southern Punjab. The other connects Baluchistan Province in the west to the North-West Frontier Province, both Taliban strongholds.

“We are being cornered in a blind alley,” said Mohammed Ali, a local landlord. “We can’t breathe easily.”

Attacks intended to intimidate and sow sectarian strife are more common. The police point to a suicide bombing in Dera Ghazi Khan on Feb. 5. Two local Punjabis, with the help of Taliban backers, orchestrated the attack, which killed 29 people at a Shiite ceremony, the local police said.

The authorities arrested two men as masterminds on April 6: Qari Muhammad Ismail Gul, the leader of a local madrasa; and Ghulam Mustafa Kaisrani, a jihadi who posed as a salesman for a medical company.

They belonged to a banned Punjabi group called Lashkar-i-Jhangvi, but were tied through phone calls to two deputies of the Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud, the police said.

“The phone numbers they call are in Waziristan,” said a police official, referring to the Taliban base in the tribal areas. “They are working together hand in glove.” One of the men had gone for training in Waziristan last summer, the police said. The operations are well-supported. Mr. Kaisrani had several bank transfers worth about $11 million from his Pakistani account, the authorities said.

Local crimes, including at least two recent bank robberies in Dera Ghazi Khan, were also traced to networks of Islamic militants, officials said.

“The money that’s coming in is huge,” said Zulfiqar Hameed, head of investigations for the Lahore Police Department. “When you go back through the chain of the transaction, you invariably find it’s been done for money.”

After the suicide attack here, the police confiscated a 20-minute inspirational video, titled “Revenge,” for the Red Mosque, which gave testimonials from suicide bombers in different cities and post-attack images.

Umme Hassan, the wife of a fiery preacher who was killed during the Red Mosque siege, now frequently travels to south Punjab, to rally the faithful. She has made 12 visits in the past several months before cheering crowds and showing emotional clips of the attack, said a Punjabi official who has been monitoring her visits.

“She claimed that they would bring Islamic revolution in three months,” said Umar Draz, who attended a rally in Muzzafargarh.

The situation in south and west Punjab is still far from that in the Swat Valley, a part of North-West Frontier Province that is now fully under Taliban control after the military agreed to a truce in February. But there are strong parallels.

The Taliban here exploit many of the same weaknesses that have allowed them to expand in other areas: an absent or intimidated police force; a lack of attention from national and provincial leaders; a population steadily cowed by threats, or won over by hard-line mullahs who usurp authority by playing on government neglect and poverty.

In Shadan Lund, a village just north of here, militants are openly demanding Islamic law, or Shariah, said Jan Sher, whose brother is a teacher there. “The situation is sharply going toward Swat,” Mr. Sher said. He and others said the single biggest obstacle to stopping the advance of militancy was the attitudes of Pakistanis themselves, whose fury at the United States has led to blind support for everyone who goes against it.

Shabaz Sharif, the chief minister of Punjab, said he was painfully aware of the problems of insurgent infiltration and was taking steps to restore people’s faith in government, including plans for new schools and hospitals. “Hearts and minds must be won,” he said in an interview Monday. “If this struggle fails, this country has no future.”

But people complain that landowners and local politicians have done nothing to stop the advance and, in some cases, even assist the militants by giving money to some of the religious schools.

“The government is useless,” said Mr. Ali, the local landlord. “They live happy, secure lives in Lahore. Their children study abroad. They only come here to contest elections.”

The police are left alone to stop the advance. But in Punjab, as in much of the rest of Pakistan, they are spread unevenly, with little presence in rural areas. Out of 160,000 police officers in Punjab, fewer than 60,000 are posted in rural areas, leaving frontier stations in districts virtually unprotected, police officials said.

Locals feel helpless. When a 15-year-old boy vanished from a madrasa in a village near here recently — his classmates said to go on jihad — his uncle could not afford to go look for him, let alone confront the powerful men who run the madrasa.

“We are simple people,” the man said. “What can we do?”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/world/asia/14punjab.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print
 
Pakistani Peace Deal Gives New Clout to Taliban Rebels

MINGORA, Pakistan -- Thousands of Islamist militants are pouring into Pakistan's Swat Valley and setting up training camps here, quickly making it one of the main bases for Taliban fighters and raising their threat to the government in the wake of a controversial peace deal.

President Asif Ali Zardari effectively ratified the government's deal with the Taliban Monday by signing a bill that imposes Islamic law in Swat, a key plank of the accord, hours after legislators overwhelmingly approved a resolution urging it. Pakistani officials have touted the deal, reached in February, as a way to restore peaceful order in the bloodied region -- which lies just a few hours' drive from the capital -- and halt the Taliban's advance.

Yet a visit to the Taliban-controlled valley here found mounting evidence that the deal already is strengthening the militants as a base for war. U.S. officials contend the pact has given the Taliban and its allies in al Qaeda and other Islamist groups an advantage in their long-running battle against Pakistan's military.

The number of militants in the valley swelled in the months before the deal with the Taliban was struck, and they continue to move in, say Pakistani and U.S. officials. They now estimate there are between 6,000 and 8,000 fighters in Swat, nearly double the number at the end of last year.

Taliban leaders here make no secret of their ultimate aim. "Our objective is to drive out Americans and their lackeys" from Pakistan and Afghanistan, said Muslim Khan, a spokesman for the group, in an interview here. "They are not Muslims and we have to throw them out."

Militant training camps are springing up across the valley's thickly forested mountainsides. "Young men with no prospect of employment and lack of education facilities are joining the militants," said Abdur Rehman, a schoolteacher in Swat.

Until the fighting began nearly two years ago in the valley, it was a popular weekend getaway for well-heeled Pakistanis, known for its alpine ridges, fruit orchards and trout-filled streams. With the Taliban now imposing its harsh version of Islamic law, floggings and even executions are fast becoming commonplace. Residents said many young men are joining the militants to ensure the safety of their families, who they hope will be left in peace if one of their own is fighting the government.

"We are all frightened by this brutality. No one can dare to challenge them," said Fazle Rabbi, who owns a cloth shop in Mingora, Swat's main town. The shop sits on a square that has become known among residents as "Slaughter Square" because the Taliban have begun using it to dump bodies after executions.

Since the new peace deal was made, the militants are beginning to push into neighboring areas. Last week they overpowered a village militia in the adjacent Buner district. The attack was a violation of the peace accord. But the Taliban faction that controls Swat says it has no intention of withdrawing. "We want Islamic sharia [law] also to be enforced in Buner," said Mr. Khan. "No one can force us out from any part of the province."

Many of the longer-term jihadist fighters are loyal to groups with ties to al Qaeda, such as Jaish-e-Mohammed. They have been hardened on battlefields in neighboring Afghanistan and the Kashmir region claimed by India and Pakistan -- underlining the growing confluence between the various Islamist groups fighting on either side of the Afghan-Pakistani border, the officials say.

The Taliban and al Qaeda were once largely confined to a mountainous ribbon that runs along the Afghan border and has long existed in a semiautonomous limbo, technically part of Pakistan but never fully under the control of its government.

In the past two years, however, the Taliban and its allies have pushed into areas where Pakistan's state had held sway, such as Swat, about 100 miles from Islamabad.

Striking peace deals with some Taliban factions is part of Pakistan's broader strategy to counter the militants. The government's logic is that such accords can exploit the groups' fractious nature; one enemy can be neutralized with a peace deal while another is defeated on the battlefield. The deals also have been struck when the army has struggled to overcome militants. In Swat, about 3,000 militants pushed four times as many soldiers out of the valley in 18 months of fighting, leaving some 1,500 people dead.

Nearly all the peace accords reached in the past few years in areas near the Afghan border, where the Taliban are strongest, have collapsed. Often they have left the militants more powerful. A similar deal in Swat fell apart last year after the Taliban renewed attacks on Pakistani forces.

The Taliban's actions since the new peace deal was unveiled have alarmed Washington, where officials fear that Swat will become an effective launching pad for expansion into Pakistan's more densely populated plains. "This is a rest stop for the Taliban, it's nothing more," said a U.S. official in Washington.

Swat now offers a glimpse of the Taliban's vision for Pakistan. They have taken control of the local government and the police, who have been ordered to shed their uniforms in favor of the traditional Shalwar Kameez, an outfit comprising a long shirt and loose trousers. They also have seized Swat's emerald mines, which extract millions of dollars a year in gemstones.

At barbershops, notices warn men not to shave their beards. Women are no longer allowed to leave their homes without their husbands or male blood relatives. Girls' schools have been reopened after initially being closed but the students must be covered from head to toe, and Taliban officials routinely inspect classrooms for violators.

"We used to have lots of cultural and extracurricular activities in the school, but all that has been stopped," said Ziaullah Yousaf Zai, a principal of a private girls' school in Mingora. "We do not want to give any pretext to the Taliban to shut the school again."

Mr. Khan, the Taliban spokesman, predicted there would soon be more executions, showing off a list of people whom the Taliban want to try in Islamic courts for what he called their "anti-Islamic" ways. The list includes senior government officials, a woman whose husband is in the U.S. military, and others. Many of them have fled or are in areas outside Taliban control

"These kinds of people should not live," said Mr. Khan, who also is a commander in the Tehrik-e-Taliban, a broader Taliban alliance focused on battling the Pakistani government.

Islamic courts haven't yet been set up in Swat because Pakistani President Zardari had delayed signing the bill to impose sharia, as the peace deal stipulates. Until Monday, he had maintained there first must be complete peace in the valley, though he didn't explain how he would determine that, nor did he address it Monday.

Mr. Zardari's delay was widely viewed as an attempt to save face with opponents of the deal in his own government and Washington. He relented after the Parliament vote established support from almost every national political party, said a senior official close to the president. One party walked out in opposition.

Mr. Khan had warned of more bloodshed if Islamic law was not formally imposed. "It does not matter to us whether the peace deal stays or not. No one can stop us from setting up our own courts," he said.

The Taliban were already imposing their own version of sharia, which has been interpreted with wide variations by Islamic scholars for centuries. Pakistani television stations recently broadcast a video of a woman being flogged by black-turbaned Taliban in Swat. Most official accounts say she was alleged to have left her house without a male blood relative.

While Mr. Khan insisted the video was a fake, he acknowledged that such an incident did happen. "As a Muslim, we cannot allow a woman to violate Islamic values," he said.

Pakistani Peace Deal Gives New Clout to Taliban Rebels - WSJ.com
 
"Mr. Khan, the Taliban spokesman, predicted there would soon be more executions, showing off a list of people whom the Taliban want to try in Islamic courts for what he called their "anti-Islamic"ways. The list includes senior government officials, a woman whose husband is in the U.S. military, and others. Many of them have fled or are in areas outside Taliban control

"These kinds of people should not live,"said Mr. Khan, who also is a commander in the Tehrik-e-Taliban, a broader Taliban alliance focused on battling the Pakistani government.

Islamic courts haven't yet been set up in Swat because Pakistani President Zardari had delayed signing the bill to impose sharia, as the peace deal stipulates. Until Monday, he had maintained there first must be complete peace in the valley, though he didn't explain how he would determine that, nor did he address it Monday.

Mr. Zardari's delay was widely viewed as an attempt to save face with opponents of the deal in his own government and Washington. He relented after the Parliament vote established support from almost every national political party, said a senior official close to the president. One party walked out in opposition.

Mr. Khan had warned of more bloodshed if Islamic law was not formally imposed.
'It does not matter to us whether the peace deal stays or not. No one can stop us from setting up our own courts,'he said."

Gotta hand to these guys. They are transparent in their intent. It's the obfuscation of the listener that's creating the cognitive dissonance in the message.

Is there any question in Khan or the soon-to-be-appointed sharia courts of the innocence of those whose names were on the list waved about by this beast?

They will die for their "anti-islamic ways" most heinously if caught. Likely from beheading. Their trials will be paragons of "swift justice" so desired by Swatis.:rolleyes: The results of the court's decision certain and very, very final.

Meanwhile I see that Mullah Faizullah gave the Friday sermon last week. Guess that means he's out of hiding, eh? I know because sitting and praying behind him were an assorted gaggle of military and state functionaries loudly applauding his sermon and enthusiastically endorsing his venomous "prayers". This same man, of course, was fully responsible for the slaying of your soldiers and the wanton murder of numerous public officials.

How soon the martyrdom on your behalf of these soldiers and functionaries has been forgotten by men who draw monthly salaries from your state. For shame.:tsk:

Your state was warned specifically about making this agreement and the likely irreversible consequences of such- both here and elsewhere. This decision and the now-evident downstream consequences were thoroughly predictable to the most basic student of conflict resolution.

Most of us from other NATIONS were told that we didn't understand/appreciate the unique local history and present circumstances.

Sure. Whatever. Clueless we are.

You movin' to paradise soon?

While the irhabists consolidate SWAT, they're using it as a launching pad for parts elsewhere in your country without any undue hesitation.

I'm very upset by this utterly predictable tragedy and the absolute lethargy I'm presently witnessing. Plenty of energy giving ol' Holbrooke a good old "what for and where for art thou" punch in the snot-locker.

Yup. Quareshi done tol' those ol' yanks the way it is!

Have a great day, Pakistan. I'm sure those in SWAT will:agree::pakistan:
 
Is Zardari going to be our Chamberlain?

We must not let him become that.

We've got to fight now. Fight our way out of this.

DG Khan will be the beginning of the end, I fear. If Dera Ghazi Khan goes, half our coutnry is cut off...and its a straight road to the heart of PUnjab and Sindh.

Help of God is with those who help themselves. Let's take this Jihad to them. It's time the Pakistan State and people declared jihad on these mercenaries and militants.
 
From a great distance, it seems so clear. The majority of the Pakistani population is frightened into submission. That is, the way all tyrannies are successful, FEAR. The power of the Taliban is FEAR. Who can fight suicide bombers?? It's terrible, I agree. But the non-suicidal "leaders", who are behind the bombers, will come next. They are true revolutionaries in the mold of the French Jacobin's; they love the guillotine. Death will follow for anyone opposed. And the tyranny will be consolidated for years to come. Then all of you here at this Forum who hate American intervention, will beg for it......
 
Last edited:
@ Truthseeker: You're talking about it as if the Taliban takeover of Pakistan is a done deal. I would be interested in the reasoning.

I would say that the elements are there - an armed force that, from an outsiders perspective, cannot or will not fight. Political elites who appear to be ineffectual and utterly divided. An opponent that very adriot - on the ground and strategically. We're not even talking religion at this stage.

Add to that American 'help' perhaps resented by a populace that is taught, or subject to propaganda, to see it as an intrusion. Brings to mind Latin America, just a little!
 
Of course it is not a done deal. But events have deteriorated with astonishing speed. Since I started coming to the PDF last November it has been defeat after defeat for the PA. Your analysis is exactly the same as my own. I don't see the necessary courage/realism on the part of the Pakistani media or GoP to counteract what is happening to them. They are too busy blaming India, USA and Israel for their problems to see that they are in a civil war but are not yet fighting. The public seems clueless. It's like the USA not taking al Qaeda seriously after Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania and Yemen, and even the first WTC bombing. Al Qaeda declared war on us in 1998 but we didn't even notice until the WTC towers came down. Same thing is happening to Pakistan.
 
Help of God is with those who help themselves. Let's take this Jihad to them. It's time the Pakistan State and people declared jihad on these mercenaries and militants.

Agreed.

But in order to achieve something like that, for starters, our people would first have to switch off GEO. Daily reruns of decapitated bodies, demolished buildings, and military personnel patrolling on the roads has led our nation to believe that if they step outside, they'll be butchered. If you don't even feel safe within you own house, then you don't HAVE a house. That mentality has to change. Not blaming GEO for everything but they sure as hell love to fuel the already burnt out fire.


'If you stare long enough at the tube (TV), the tube becomes the Almighty!' - My own.
 
Last edited:
@ Truthseeker: The difference here is that in the case of the US the enemy was in stark contrast to mainstream culture and therefore easily identified (after a long time admittedly) - Muslim, Foreign, and of an ideology that was at total odds with middle America, if I can call it that. There was clear and present danger, clearly visible.

Those boundaries begin to blur in Pakistan, IMO. There are cultural, racial, emotional, economic and ideological contiguities that make it hard to know where friendship changes to enmity. Since the the enemy is not so easily distinguished, he cannot be so easily combated. Now that I'm speaking in cliches, it's more a case of "We have seen the enemy, and (holy crap) it is us".
 
Those boundaries begin to blur in Pakistan, IMO.

That is why I called it a "civil" war. It is a war over freedom of (or from) religion. I think it is somewhat similar to the USA civil war over slavery. A moral question that had economic, regional and personal power issues mixed in.

Nonetheless, on one side are Wahabi (or Deobandi) Islamists, and on the other side a broad spectrum of Muslims who don't agree with the lifestyle being imposed by the likes of the TTP. The main problems are (1) the fear of the viciousness of the Wahabi side, and, (2) confusion over the whole concept of fighting brother "Muslims". The Wahabi side is not disarmed by the second issue. They are Takfiris, plain and simple. So they are not confused about fighting their apostate opponents.
 
I have read on this forum a few ideas on combating the Taliban tide. I think that there is a danger of these ideas existing in isolation, as opposed to a comprehensive approach.

Here goes my two cent worth of nothing, based on my high status as an armchair field marshal.

First, define your enemy. Who is the enemy, really?

Second, what do you mean by 'defeating the enemy'? What does victory look like?

Third, how do you want to fight the enemy? Militarily? Politically? Financially? Ideologically?

Fourth, who or what are your assets? How can you best make use of said assets?

Fourth, what are your weaknesses? How can you prevent the enemy from capitalizing on these?

Fifth, who or what entity will take the leadership position in this fight? The state? The army?

And last, what are you prepared to sacrifice in order to win?
 
First, define your enemy. Who is the enemy, really?

Your list is a good start. But even the first question that I have quoted above, stymies the USA. We are afraid to make enemies who are not now enemies, so we call it a War on Terrorism! I think Pakistanis would have a very hard time agreeing to an answer to your first question. Because of my second point above. Muslims cannot be enemies of Muslims, can they? Who is a Muslim? They cannot agree to an answer to that. It is much easier to focus hatred on Hindus, Jews and Christians (and Sikhs, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Jains, Shintos, Confucians, etc., etc. )
 
Your list is a good start. But even the first question that I have quoted above, stymies the USA. We are afraid to make enemies who are not now enemies, so we call it a War on Terrorism! I think Pakistanis would have a very hard time agreeing to an answer to your first question. Because of my second point above. Muslims cannot be enemies of Muslims, can they? Who is a Muslim? They cannot agree to an answer to that. It is much easier to focus hatred on Hindus, Jews and Christians (and Sikhs, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Jains, Shintos, Confucians, etc., etc. )

It isn't going to be easy. Heck, far as I know, Malaya is looked on as an example of a successful counter insurgency operation. It had a Chinese ethnic group as a clearly identifiable enemy, and it took what more than 30 years to put down?

I think that the events of the past two years has forced Pakistan into a struggle to define or redefine a core identity. From my - Indian- perspective the core of that identity has been forged from two elements- religion and an being 'anti India'. I think that definition needs to be expanded to combat an assault from within.
 
^TS, the license to kill fellow muslims seems to increase with puritanism.

If you're a moderate muslim, you can't kill anyone except non-muslims.

If you're extremist musilm, you can kill every other sect of Islam as well.

That's how it appears to work at the moment.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom