What's new

Allegations on ISI: Defence Ministry to move against Geo in PEMRA

Cancel their Licences. These cockroaches were telling everyone to follow constitution. What they did was against constitution. They want to run this country by their own interests. Kick them out ASAP.

Where is the proof that a violation of the Constitution has occurred?
 
So the same Ministry that the GHQ bypassed when demanding its budget directly from the Finance Ministry is now the one to defend it in court? It goes to show just who calls the shots in total and imperious violations of law. Picking and choosing when to obey the law and when not to obey does not work.

Hi,

It does---all the time in the good ole USA---.
 
Hi,

It does---all the time in the good ole USA---.

So when is Pentagon moving the courts to ban MSNBC? Oh wait ........

Back to the topic of this thread, it would be interesting to see how PEMRA handles this complaint against a major media outlet.
 
.........

The kept blaming a national organization for hours which is against the constitution.

Where does it say in the Constitution that the ISI cannot be blamed?
 
PEMRA has to follow due process first. What are the grounds that have been proven to merit cancellation?



Of course, if the evidence is proven to be correct, then PEMRA has to publish the grounds for its decision. Let them follow due process and come to a proper conclusion.

Okay so you want them to cancel their license according to legal process?
 
Okay so you want them to cancel their license according to legal process?

Of course, if the case is proven, then the punishment specified by law is appropriate. But only after the crime is proven.
 
This is an opportunity to clamp down on foreign funding, to identify the culprits who are giving bad name to the country and to punish them.

This is also a time to put limits on this type of 'freedom' which media is so much enjoying. Media freedom is controlled by ethics. There are certain rules and certain boundaries that no state allows to cross.

If this opportunity is not availed, then we dont know when there will be another one.

Do we need any evidence than what Geo itself has said? It has been making false and out of this world allegations against Pakistan Army. That evidence should be used against Geo and media regulation should be strictly enforced.
 
This is an opportunity to clamp down on foreign funding, to identify the culprits who are giving bad name to the country and to punish them.

This is also a time to put limits on this type of 'freedom' which media is so much enjoying. Media freedom is controlled by ethics. There are certain rules and certain boundaries that no state allows to cross.

If this opportunity is not availed, then we dont know when there will be another one.

Do we need any evidence than what Geo itself has said? It has been making false and out of this world allegations against Pakistan Army. That evidence should be used against Geo and media regulation should be strictly enforced.
Lets hope that the opportunity is exploited to the maximum in the interest of this country. Probably there will be no next time if it is missed.
 
Where is the proof that a violation of the Constitution has occurred?
Read it Loudly.
Article: 19 Freedom of speech, etc
19. Freedom of speech, etc.-Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, 1[commission of] or incitement to an offence.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Footnotes:

1. Section 4 of the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 (71 of 1975) substituted the said words in place of the word “defamation”, in Art. 19, (w.e.f. November 21, 1975).
 
Read it Loudly.
Article: 19 Freedom of speech, etc
19. Freedom of speech, etc.-Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, 1[commission of] or incitement to an offence.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Footnotes:

1. Section 4 of the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 (71 of 1975) substituted the said words in place of the word “defamation”, in Art. 19, (w.e.f. November 21, 1975).

Yes, read it: subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law.

What are these restrictions and how have they been violated?


Hi,

It is already banned----which news media is free in the u s---cnn foxnews msnbc----name one---they all towing the line that the govt wants them to tow specially in matters of war in the afg iraq israel / palestine ukraine---the korean airliener that the russians shot down.

Hasn't the pentagon banned any pictures of the coffins of the dead soldiers coming home.

Is that the topic here? Nope.
 
So when is Pentagon moving the courts to ban MSNBC? Oh wait ........

Back to the topic of this thread, it would be interesting to see how PEMRA handles this complaint against a major media outlet.


Hi,

It is already banned----which news media is free in the u s---cnn foxnews msnbc----name one---they all towing the line that the govt wants them to tow specially in matters of war in the afg iraq israel / palestine ukraine---the korean airliener that the russians shot down.

Hasn't the pentagon banned any pictures of the coffins of the dead soldiers coming home.
 
Back
Top Bottom