trident2010
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,775
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
As always, chinese show cheap copy of a proven equipment and think they can rule the (3rd) world.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Modelling a missile based one India had since 2006 is awe?
Er..........I do not even have to visit that thread to, say none of Chinese weapons presented are a game changer.
Because some Chinese need to be felt important in our eyes
Sour grape at its best. If Bangladesh wants a air defense missile, they will look for China, if Bangladesh wants to buy a tank , they will look for China.As always, chinese show cheap copy of a proven equipment and think they can rule the (3rd) world.
Sour grape at its best. If Bangladesh wants a air defense missile, they will look for China, if Bangladesh wants to buy a tank , they will look for China.
Look how useless India that can't even sell a major weapon to your sphere of influence. Pathetic if I am indian, I will have long jump off high storeys to spare mysef further humiliation with death. Such a useless country. It's the laugh butt of the whole world.
JF-17 is purely develop for PAF to replace entire fleet of Mirage3,5 and F-7, F-7PG, if china have better option so why they induct JF-17 to replace SU-30MKK.Now stick to the topic, its comparing b/w chiese latest CX-1 and your crapy BrahmouseVery true, Brahmos is useless.
Unlike J-17 which has replaced the entire SU MKK fleet in PLAF
Comprehension issues? which part of my post mentioned anything about the word -"design"brahmos is a inferior downgrade of p800 onyx. Please don't brag as you have the original design.
You are very afraid of chinese advancement. Fee the awe and you little ostrich continue hide in your head in the hole
You an Indian now crapping in Chinese thread and claim we are the one need your attention? are you shooting your own mouth? I never bother much go to Indian thread becos Indian cant even make a simple T-90 rounds. So what advance weapon can Indian make?
What does healthy functioning of human genitals of Indian nationality have anything to do with this thread? makes me wonder what you are watching in the other tabdon't say I lied about Indian impotent.
No more please.Do you want me to show you the link to humiliate you Indians further?
tell me one thing that you have also cheap copy of your LEAST CHANCED AIRCRAFT from france and ARJUNK from UK and Brahmouse from russia, so why not china develop their weapon from scratchAs always, chinese show cheap copy of a proven equipment and think they can rule the (3rd) world.
Comprehension issues? which part of my post mentioned anything about the word -"design"
Chinese advancement in a technology India possessed since 2006, very scary indeed
Read the thread title - "all-new-cx-1-supersonic-anti-ship-cruise-missile-ascm-chinese-answer-to-brahmos"
What does healthy functioning of human genitals of Indian nationality have anything to do with this thread? makes me wonder what you are watching in the other tab
No more please.
you have successfully humiliated my belief in human evolution with intellect
New Recruit
Having everything it needs is the reason why India can not develop superior weapon.Sour grapes for what? India has everything it needs and much before China could copy it and produce a cheap rip-off. Selling to Bangladesh, Pakistan or any other poor countries your 2nd grade cheap equipments doesn't show anything good for china.
They are buying because they have "no choice" not because they "choose" cheap chinese rip-offs. lolzz
Please people can we rest this childish chatter.
There is no doubt in the fact that China is ahead of India.
But I want China and India to be friends. Good friends. We are the only ancient civilisations remaining after all.
1. Maybe they do have something better. However, assuming this is so, care to enlighten us what specifically you consider to be the better missile currently in Russian service and why specifically you think it is better?My point is the BrahMos is basically a monkey model missile that the Russians don't want because they have something better in service. In which case the "joint" development aspect of it is more Indian hot air. The Russians are extremely good at scamming India out of money.
1. Because a JV is a business agreement, not a product.The need to produced proof is you. You are the one trying to lumber brahmos with onyx. Now you claim you can't? Brahmos is different from onyx. If not, why the need for a joint venture? India shall just straight buy onyx and no Brahmos. I have long say you are pro indian. Trying to defend indian Brahmos on same ground with onyx is a joke.
Finally agentorange claim Brahmos is not in service with Russian not onyx. Stop playing with words. I know what game you trying to play.