What's new

Aitzaz Blasts Asif, says most graft charges are justified

niaz

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
5,164
Reaction score
211
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Following news item was published in today's Dawn

Aitzaz blasts Asif, says most graft charges justified

By Masood Haider

NEW YORK, June 1: Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, President of Supreme Court Bar Association and a leader of Pakistan People’s Party, has severely criticised his party’s co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari for dragging his feet on restoration of the judiciary because he “doesn’t want independent judges”.

In a highly volatile and extensive interview with the New York Times magazine (Ahsan was on the cover of the magazine), he said that most charges of corruption against Ms Benazir Bhutto and Mr Asif Ali Zardari were justified. It may be mentioned that Barrister Ahsan was the minister of interior in the first government of Benazir Bhutto.

The author of the article, James Traub, writes: “I asked him (Mr Ahsan) how many of the allegations of corruption he believed were justified.

“Most of them,” Mr Ahsan said, after a moment’s reflection.

“The type of expenses that she had and he has are not from sources of income that can be lawfully explained and accounted for.”

In the interview which was conducted over a week, James Traub said that Mr Ahsan recognised that the PPP was itself a feudal and only marginally democratic body led by a figure accused of corruption and violence.

Mr Ahsan, who defended both Ms Benazir Bhutto and Mr Zardari in 14 cases, told Times that the charges of “corruption against both” and in Mr Zardari’s case also of “kidnapping, ransom and murder”, were justified.

“Ahsan”, said the interviewer, “is almost recklessly outspoken about PPP leaders, even though they are his own political patrons. He speaks admiringly of Benazir Bhutto’s courage and steadfastness but also points out with disdain that she viewed herself as the PPP’s ‘life chairperson’. And he does not bother to conceal his dim view of Zardari.”

Besides, the Times article said, Mr Ahsan believed that in the aftermath of the Lahore incident, wherein he saved former federal minister Sher Afghan from the wrath of the people ‘that he is more famous in the country than at any other time’.

“And I have become much more famous.” The thought tickled both his vanity and his sense of irony. “I’m being treated,” he said, “like the policeman who’s rescued the cat from the tree”.

On Mr Ahsan’s decision not to contest polls, Traub said: “I spoke to Mr Ahsan by phone a few days later. He had decided not to contest a by-election slated for this summer. He had decisively chosen movement politics over party politics, and perhaps he was happiest there. Mr Zardari and the PPP seemed to have increasingly thrown in their lot with Mr Musharraf, appointing allies of the president to key posts. Mr Ahsan wasn’t worried that a new round of protests, this time directed in part at his own party, would divide the country.

“There’s enormous popular support for my position,” he said. And he was, as ever, blithe in the face of confrontation. “I’m comfortable,” he reported from his home in Lahore. “I have no problem.”

On the issues of judges and confrontation between Mr Zardari and Mr Ahsan, Traub relates: “On the morning flight from Karachi to Sukkur, a city in the southern province of Sindh where the Pakistan People’s Party high command was going for an annual pilgrimage to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s grave site — now that of his daughter as well —Ahsan was approached by Farooq Naek, the law minister and a party leader. Naek, according to Ahsan, asked him to mute his harsh criticism of Zardari and the party. Zardari had reached an agreement with Nawaz Sharif to reinstate the judges within 30 days of the formation of the new government, and Naik implored Ahsan to show some faith and trust. Ahsan agreed to act as if he accepted their bona fides, though he didn’t altogether.

He says he believed that Zardari feared that Chaudhry and other apolitical judges might restore some of the cases against him that had been summarily dismissed. Ahsan seemed quite blithe about these concerns.

When I asked if he worried that the lawyers could be blamed for splitting the fragile coalition, he said, “if the party doesn’t act, it will force a debate inside the party, and that would be a good thing.” That night he pushed Zardari hard at the party’s conclave near the Bhutto family grave site; Zardari pushed back, insisting, according to Raja Adil Bashir, a party official, that the lawyers “should not try to threaten the government.”

Aitzaz blasts Asif, says most graft charges justified -DAWN - Top Stories; June 02, 2008
 
Very interesting.

Is Zardari and the Bhutto dynasty on its way to oblivion I wonder?

Makhdoom Fahim and many of the senior leaders of the PPP have been estranged by Zardari, but they have not left the party. I would argue that if Zardari is unable to pull together this government and show results, we may well see a coup within the party.
 
AA 2-in-1 Judge-politician has no shame.. he will do anything to gain popularity and sympathy from people by "fake" backstabbing his master.
 
Aitazaz has denied having said this and today he has demanded explaination from NEW YORK TIMES for misquoting him.
 
^^AA is now denying everything - he claims he has been misquoted by NYT.
 
^^AA is now denying everything - he claims he has been misquoted by NYT.

Give us some inside news dude who was it. What are yours sources point at.... how much did Zardari pay Aitzaz for this phantasm.
 
Give us some inside news dude who was it. What are yours sources point at.... how much did Zardari pay Aitzaz for this phantasm.

since you r such a huge PPP supporter, find out yourself DUDE!
 
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

Editorial: Aitzaz should stop running with the hare and hunting with the hound

The lawyers’ movement has rejected the constitutional package presented by the Pakistan People’s Party. If positions on both sides remain deterministic, we can now be sure that the movement will stay on a collision course with the current PPP government. Siding with the lawyers movement is the PMLN. It has already pulled out of the cabinet and might pull out of the coalition if it stays the current course of pressing for the restoration of judges upfront and without reference to any constitutional package. Given this perspective, we might be in for a spell of agitation politics.

However, while the lawyers movement has rejected the PPP’s position on how the judges restoration is to be achieved and the fate of President Pervez Musharraf, the most prominent leader of the movement, Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, is caught on the horns of a dilemma. He wants to continue affiliating with the PPP even as he is turning the lawyers movement against the party. His problem originates in his earlier decision to spurn the “deal” that the PPP leader Benazir Bhutto clinched with President Pervez Musharraf before her assassination, including her decision to contest the elections. He should have realised then that he couldn’t sail in two boats at the same time for long but he didn’t. That has made his position untenable by the day.

Mr Ahsan is now quoted by the New York Times as making “reckless” critical remarks about Ms Bhutto and Asif Zardari. But instead of owning up to them because they truly reflect his views about the PPP’s leadership and policies, he has chosen to deny the remarks and distance himself from the interview. Understandably, not many who have heard Mr Ahsan publicly or privately are prepared to accept his denial. The content of what he said is not very different from the views he has held since he began spearheading the lawyers movement and saw the chasm developing between his goal of re-establishing constitutionalism, his personal political ambitions and his party’s realpolitik.

The irony of all this is that, even as he is at pains to deny it, many of Mr Ahsan’s supporters are flaunting the NYT story as an example of his “conviction and commitment” to the cause of constitutionalism.

It is time therefore that Mr Ahsan should realise the logic of his own stand which squarely pits him against his own party. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Mr Ahsan’s decision to plough a different furrow. He may even decide to form a new political party, one that is wedded to pushing Pakistan in the direction of constitutionalism. But by holding on to everything, he may be left holding nothing. *
 
IMO, understably Aitzaz thinks that he is cleaner and more intelligent than Asif, therefore he should be the leader of PPP. Interview with NYT was a 'Hint' to Asif Zardari that he should follow the line of the lawyers movement or Aitzaz would spill the beans and discredit Asif altogether.

If the situation is back to pre Nov 3, 2007 position, there is a strong possibility that NRO would be repealed. It is simple logic that if Musharraf was ineligible to be elected President ( a certainty if PCO Jugdes are removed and Ch Iftikhar and his supporters takeover Supreme Court) then all actions by an illegal President become automatically illegal. Thus Asif is either jailed or runs away, leaving the field open to Aitzaz. Asif is aware of this and that is why he would like to keep the PCO Judges as well leave Musahrraf away out.

It would be interesting to see which way the cookie crumbles.
 
IMO, understably Aitzaz thinks that he is cleaner and more intelligent than Asif, therefore he should be the leader of PPP. Interview with NYT was a 'Hint' to Asif Zardari that he should follow the line of the lawyers movement or Aitzaz would spill the beans and discredit Asif altogether.

If the situation is back to pre Nov 3, 2007 position, there is a strong possibility that NRO would be repealed. It is simple logic that if Musharraf was ineligible to be elected President ( a certainty if PCO Jugdes are removed and Ch Iftikhar and his supporters takeover Supreme Court) then all actions by an illegal President become automatically illegal. Thus Asif is either jailed or runs away, leaving the field open to Aitzaz. Asif is aware of this and that is why he would like to keep the PCO Judges as well leave Musahrraf away out.

It would be interesting to sea which way the cookie crumbles.

niaz your logic would work in all parts of the world except pakistan. the constitution has been raped so many times that any worthy lawyer can manipulate this document to please his master. there is no value of this document to them.
 
what Aitzaz said in his interview is no doubt a 100% fact & can not be denied
The world knows what Zardari had done during his previous govt.
With power in his hand, he may clean himself but not the minds of people
 

Back
Top Bottom