What's new

Ahmadiyya Mosque under threat and Ahmadis beaten up

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ehsan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
425
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
ahmadi_women_harassed_College_Nursing.jpg


On July 11, the first day of Ramazan, a group of Sunnis beat up the Ahmedis and kicked them out of the place of worship, telling them not to return, according to members of the Ahmadi community.

The Ahmedis filed a complaint with the police for the registration of an FIR against the assailants. The police did not register a case, nor heeded their request for protection. Instead, they sealed the place of worship, which is located on a four-marla plot, “because of concerns of a clash,” said Dolatnagar SHO Riaz Qadir. He said that previously, both Sunnis and Ahmadis had prayed there.

In fact, the members of the two communities are related. The place of worship is located on four marlas within an eight-kanal property owned by an Ahmadi family which they were allotted when the Revenue Department conducted a consolidation exercise, known as ‘ishtimal’, some 20 years ago. Such land consolidation exercises are carried out every so often when inheritance laws result in the non-contiguous division of land holdings between heirs.

Police and revenue

The SHO said that according to the Revenue Department record, the building had been a Sunni mosque, but had been transferred to Ahmedis around 20 years ago. He said that the Sunnis were now claiming ownership of the place as a Sunni mosque.

The SHO said that he had seen the Jamat-i-Ahmadiyya’s ownership document for a four-marla property within that eight-kanal parcel, but the document did not specify where exactly within that eight kanals the four-marla property was located.

He said that the question of ownership had been referred to the National Interfaith Peace and Harmony Committee and the property sealed in the meantime, with the approval of the district coordination officer. He said that the Sunnis had agreed to this, but the Ahmedis had not.

Asked why no assault case had been registered on the Ahmedis’ complaint after members of the community were beaten up and thrown out of the place of worship on the first day of Ramazan, the SHO said that since no blood had been spilt, there could be no FIR.

Land record

The eight kanals within which the four-marla property is located is owned by Tahir Hameed, who inherited the land from his father. Hameed, 18, said that his father had donated the four-marla property to the Jamat-i-Ahmadiya to build a place of worship, which they named Baitul Zikr. “Ahmedis have been praying there since before I was born,” he said.

He said that on the first of Ramazan, Munir Shah, Ahmed Raza, Maulvi Shabbir and others had attacked his brother Qamar Hameed and his cousin Adnan Ahmed and forced them out of the worship place. He said his brother and cousin had been beaten up. He said they were under severe threat from locals and had been told to disown the property. “Some extremist clerics have turned the locals against us and are trying to dislodge us,” he said.

Hameed said that the community had no faith in the Interfaith Peace and Harmony Committee, which is why they did not accept its role in arbitration.

When contacted, Asim Imtiaz, the vice president of the committee, said that he was at the patwari’s office and trying to establish the ownership of the disputed land.

He said that the four-marla property appeared to have been transferred to the Jamat-i-Ahmadiya by the patwari “by mistake”. He added that he was hopeful the dispute would be resolved and the property “would be given to Muslims”.

Tanveer Ahmed, another member of the Ahmadi community in Fatehpur, said that local clerics had been making worrying announcements in the mosques of nearby villages and he feared that there would be mob attacks on Ahmedis. He said that Ahmedis did not trust the committee to remain impartial on the matter.

“The Jamat-i-Ahmadiya has ownership documents for the property,” he said. “It is the responsibility of the police and the state to follow the law in settling the matter.”

Source: RT
 
^^^ post reported for insulting other's prophet. I will wait for 24 hours to decide whether forum rules have changed, after that you will find somebody you think as prophet being described in unflattering term here by me

edit : for those who are baffled... there was an offensive post above with pictures by 'turbo charged'.. that has been deleted now
 
lolz we will see .. I dont care if I get banned, either respectfully remove the pic and offending words or bear insult to your own prophet. Dont tell me I did not warn you.. :cheers:

forum rules are same for all.. lolz.

That assumption may or may not hold true.



However, religious beliefs should be respected by all, I would agree.
 
also change the thread title....

its a qadiani temple and qadiani qabza group caught and beaten up
 
Why?
Just remove the bigot 'turbo charged' posts and the thread is great.

no just mentalguys post

aur sab ko pata hay iss sab ka

some people here dont just make comment agaist islam that they are hurt first they have a habbit they need an excuse
 
^^^ post reported for insulting other's prophet. I will wait for 24 hours to decide whether forum rules have changed, after that you will find somebody you think as prophet being described in unflattering term here by me

Thanks good move its a good way to clean up this forum of such viruses , report them and request BAN
 
aa gaey insaniat kay thakaydar.......................................................
 
That guy is an Ignorant fool who thinks one faith is supreme and others can be insulted. Pity these brain washed guys :hitwall:

Most of them don't even know the true meaning of religion and its importance :sick:
 
Wrong to call a non-Muslim's place of worship a mosque. A mosque / masjid is a place of Muslim congregation beside other functions exclusively for the Muslims.

People are even confused who is true muslim and who is not. Even Sunnis and Shias have had areas of disagreement remaining unsolved for centuries. So what gives?
 
People are even confused who is true muslim and who is not. Even Sunnis and Shias have had areas of disagreement remaining unsolved for centuries. So what gives?
you don't be worry its our own issue
we have issues with shia but they are ower owns
if you like qadiyani so much than we hae near about 10-20 lakh take them and settle them in india
 
^^^ post reported for insulting other's prophet. I will wait for 24 hours to decide whether forum rules have changed, after that you will find somebody you think as prophet being described in unflattering term here by me

And then the question comes about tolerance?! :unsure:

Werent you jumping up and down about tolerance?

Lets see:

Mīrzā Ghulām Ahmad[3] (Hindustani:مرزا غلام احمد/मिर्जा गुलाम अहमद; February 13, 1835 – 26 May 1908 CE, or 14 Shawal 1250 – 24 Rabi' al-thani 1326 AH) was a religious figure from India and the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement.
He claimed to be the Mujaddid (divine reformer) of the fourteenth Islamic century, the second messiah and the Mahdi. However, he is regarded by orthodox Muslims as heretical because he claimed to be a non law-bearing (deputy) prophet after Muhammad, whom Muslims traditionally believe to be the final prophet sent to guide mankind.

He declared that Jesus (Isa) had in fact survived crucifixion and later died a natural death after having migrated towards Kashmir, and that the notion of his physical return was therefore erroneous. He declared that he had been divinely appointed as the mahdi, in the spirit and power of Jesus

From India where many SUDDENLY have divine powers!! check

Twisted some historical and theological facts!! check

He insulted Christians by saying christ was not crucified while the Muslim historian who wrote about the crusifiction of Christ was questioned repeatedly on Fox news!! Interesting though...

Then he actually said that Jesus ran to Kashmir :rofl: all he did was claim....no historical evidence whatnot....Insulted 2 religions and yet cry they are the victims? Jub jurat hai kuch kernay ki then bhuk tou!

I do not support their killing but to say they are oppressed is an understatement ...they are like Jews, rich you barely find poor Ahmedi in Pakistan...they always have scholarships and whatnot...seriously howelse do you think most of them are abroad and having good education + jobs?! Even in Pakistan they have lands....they have businesses...they are not homeless!

I do not support their killing but they should not cry out so loud and those idiots who harass them do need sit down and talk....

2ndly, there needs to be open discussion with them...so far no Ahmedi talks about their faith...All they talk about is Ghulam sahib...not about WHAT their faith is about and why would ANYONE say such a thing about Jesus? And how can they justify prophets when Prophet MUHAMMAD SAW was the last prophet??

That guy is an Ignorant fool who thinks one faith is supreme and others can be insulted. Pity these brain washed guys :hitwall:

Most of them don't even know the true meaning of religion and its importance :sick:

Really? I thought he was being critical...like some of you jump and say when people bash Islam it is criticizing and Muslims lack tolerance...when other faiths are questioned by A MUSLIM....its insulting?!
 
Calling these peoples temples a mosque is a disgrace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom