After Supreme Court rejects Zaibunnisa Kazi’s petition, Markandey Katju issues an appeal

[syedali73]

Mumbai blasts: After Supreme Court rejects Zaibunnisa Kazi's petition, Markandey Katju issues an appeal : India, News - India Today

 

[nair]

72 year old????? Let her go home......

 

[syedali73]

72 year old????? Let her go home......

72 years old who? Muslim... 3rd rate citizen of India. Even animals such as dogs, monkeys, cows, even rats are better protected.

At any rate, people such as Justice Markandey are glimmer of hope.

 

[nair]

72 years old who? Muslim... 3rd rate citizen of India.

At any rate, people such as Justice Markandey are glimmer of hope.

That is the way you see it..... I see an Indian who is convicted for a crime want to get pardon from state..... Katju who was a judge before has a difference of opinion and want her to be released, he is entitled to have his own opinion on this case, and with his experience he also should know how the legal system in india works and what are the do's or dont's.......

On medical ground and looking at her age i support her release.........

Stop making Hindu vs Muslim in every thread you see my friend....... Life is larger than that.....

 

[utraash]

Keeping her age into consideration she must be let go.....

72 years old who? Muslim... 3rd rate citizen of India. Even animals such as dogs, monkeys, cows, even rats are better protected.

At any rate, people such as Justice Markandey are glimmer of hope.

Reserve your infuriating lines for bigger cause than this n don't blur your thinking out of being a Muslim n anti India....

 

[syedali73]

That is the way you see it..... I see an Indian who is convicted for a crime want to get pardon from state..... Katju who was a judge before has a difference of opinion and want her to be released, he is entitled to have his own opinion on this case, and with his experience he also should know how the legal system in india works and what are the do's or dont's.......

On medical ground and looking at her age i support her release.........

Stop making Hindu vs Muslim in every thread you see my friend....... Life is larger than that.....

Right, the Hindus who who were involved in killing Muslims in Gujarat were acquitted and this old lady, against whom the case is not proven (hence Justice Markandey's observation), is turned in. This is the justice in India.

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case

Three British citizens and their local driver were killed by a mob in Sabarkantha

A special SIT court in Himmatnagar in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on Friday acquitted six persons for lack of evidence in a 2002 post-Godhra riots case, in which three British nationals and another person were killed by a mob.

British citizens Saeed Dawood, Shakeel Dawood and Mohammad Aswat and their local driver Yusuf Suleiman were killed in the Prantij town in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on February 28, a day after the Sabarmati Express train burning incident.

According to the prosecution, they were travelling in a vehicle when they were intercepted by a mob and burnt alive. Another Briton, Imran Dawood, managed to escape with injuries. Imran and his three uncles were on a visit to India. They were returning from their native village of Lajpor near Navsari in Gujarat after visiting Agra and Jaipur.

The Supreme Court-appointed SIT had charged six persons Mithanbhai Patel, Chandu alias Prahlad Patel, Ramesh Patel, Manoj Patel, Rajesh Patel and Kalabhai Patel, all residents of Prantij, with murder and rioting. Principal District Judge I.C. Shah gave the benefit of the doubt to the accused as the prosecution was not able to prove the case “beyond reasonable doubt.”

The court rejected complainant Imran’s testimony as “doubtful” and “not believable” as he was “not sure” about the identity of the accused. His evidence “cannot be relied upon when it is also not corroborated by any other cogent evidence,” the court observed.

“Apart from the complainant’s non-cooperation, two eye-witnesses also turned hostile and did not support the prosecution’s case,” Special Public Prosecutor R.C. Kodekar told The Hindu.

The court concluded: “ … It seems there is no evidence on record from which it can be believed that the accused were members of unlawful assembly and involved in the commission of the crime.”

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case - The Hindu

 

[nair]

Right, the Hindus who who were involved in killing Muslims in Gujarat were acquitted and this old lady, against whom the case is not proven (hence Justice Markandey's observation), is turned in. This is the justice in India.

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case

View attachment 197559

Three British citizens and their local driver were killed by a mob in Sabarkantha

A special SIT court in Himmatnagar in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on Friday acquitted six persons for lack of evidence in a 2002 post-Godhra riots case, in which three British nationals and another person were killed by a mob.

British citizens Saeed Dawood, Shakeel Dawood and Mohammad Aswat and their local driver Yusuf Suleiman were killed in the Prantij town in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on February 28, a day after the Sabarmati Express train burning incident.

According to the prosecution, they were travelling in a vehicle when they were intercepted by a mob and burnt alive. Another Briton, Imran Dawood, managed to escape with injuries. Imran and his three uncles were on a visit to India. They were returning from their native village of Lajpor near Navsari in Gujarat after visiting Agra and Jaipur.

The Supreme Court-appointed SIT had charged six persons Mithanbhai Patel, Chandu alias Prahlad Patel, Ramesh Patel, Manoj Patel, Rajesh Patel and Kalabhai Patel, all residents of Prantij, with murder and rioting. Principal District Judge I.C. Shah gave the benefit of the doubt to the accused as the prosecution was not able to prove the case “beyond reasonable doubt.”

The court rejected complainant Imran’s testimony as “doubtful” and “not believable” as he was “not sure” about the identity of the accused. His evidence “cannot be relied upon when it is also not corroborated by any other cogent evidence,” the court observed.

“Apart from the complainant’s non-cooperation, two eye-witnesses also turned hostile and did not support the prosecution’s case,” Special Public Prosecutor R.C. Kodekar told The Hindu.

The court concluded: “ … It seems there is no evidence on record from which it can be believed that the accused were members of unlawful assembly and involved in the commission of the crime.”

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case - The Hindu

I am sure you know this is off topic You want to discuss gujarat call me in to gujarat thread where we can discuss..... for your info there is a live thread on gurajat riots...... I am not backing off, but stopping you from going off topic.

 

[syedali73]

I am sure you know this is off topic You want to discuss gujarat call me in to gujarat thread where we can discuss..... for your info there is a live thread on gurajat riots...... I am not backing off, but stopping you from going off topic.

I am sure I know what I am talking about. I am talking about the selective justice in India where an elderly Muslim woman is sent to jail while at the same time 6 Hindu terrorists are acquitted.

It is amazing that Justice Markandey's observations are totally being ignored here:

 

[nair]

I am sure I know what I am talking about. I am talking about the selective justice in India where an elderly Muslim woman is sent to jail while at the same time 6 Hindu terrorists are acquitted.

I do not should i laugh or cry....... You have no idea how judicial system works in India........ Ever heard of someone called Sanjay Dutt?

 

[janon]

Right, the Hindus who who were involved in killing Muslims in Gujarat were acquitted and this old lady, against whom the case is not proven (hence Justice Markandey's observation), is turned in. This is the justice in India.

You have to stop repeating this lie. Many hindus have been arrested and given stiff sentences for the riots, including a high ranking minister in Modi's ministry (life imprisonment). Most muslims who burned 54 people to death on a train, the incident which sparked the riots, have not been arrested yet.

Unlike you, for us it's India first. We don't think of the victims or perpetrators as hindus or muslims, but as Indians. The 1993 serial blasts was the biggest act of terrorism on Indian soil, responsible for killing 254 people (including that of many muslims, if that's what matters to you), and maiming thousands. If she was involved in it, she deserves the highest punishment of the land, whether she is muslim or hindu or pastafarian. All the courts, including the supreme court, have been convinced of her guilt. She is in jail only after being given every legal resource existing, unlike some countries where a right to a fair trial does not even exist.

If you have a case to make about her innocence, do so. But playing the religion card is pathetic, and is an insult to hundreds of millions of muslims living peacefully in India - as if muslims who indulge in such activities should be above suspicion or penalty because of their religion.

 

[nair]

View attachment 197561

Katju is entitled to have his own opinion, ( I cannot say he is right or wrong in analysing this case) But being a retired judge he should know, what he is supposed to do or not, especially when it comes to judiciary....

 

[pursuit of happiness]

72 years old who? Muslim... 3rd rate citizen of India. Even animals such as dogs, monkeys, cows, even rats are better protected.

At any rate, people such as Justice Markandey are glimmer of hope.

--
Read properly..
its not mandetary to incude relgion in every aspect of deision atleast not in SC of india..
best part of democracy is erey is enttile of opinion ,,, somtimes even gross ones

 

[halupridol]

That is the way you see it..... I see an Indian who is convicted for a crime want to get pardon from state..... Katju who was a judge before has a difference of opinion and want her to be released, he is entitled to have his own opinion on this case, and with his experience he also should know how the legal system in india works and what are the do's or dont's.......

On medical ground and looking at her age i support her release.........

Stop making Hindu vs Muslim in every thread you see my friend....... Life is larger than that.....

life whaat,,,umm,,dont u know,,,hindus r incorrigible
let me tell u,,,,central jail patients(cjp) r like sarkari daamads in govt. hospitals,,they got special wards,,,24 hrs security,,,2 hawaldars always accompany each mehman ,,they get free top of the line treatment n priority over othr patients,,,why?
coz any slacking can lead to a magistrate level inquiry n subsequent suspension of the involved.
need proof,,go to any govt. hospital,a CHC(Community health center),situated near a central jail,,,enter the PAC room(pre anesthetic clearence),,,chck log book.the amount of paper work done on CJP patients n the strict following of protocol(even for somthng as trivial as hydrocele) will be evident.
so,decision of releasing someone accused of terrorism shud be done after proper scrutiny n not becoz a retired judge feels so.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

Right, the Hindus who who were involved in killing Muslims in Gujarat were acquitted and this old lady, against whom the case is not proven (hence Justice Markandey's observation), is turned in. This is the justice in India.

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case

View attachment 197559

Three British citizens and their local driver were killed by a mob in Sabarkantha

A special SIT court in Himmatnagar in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on Friday acquitted six persons for lack of evidence in a 2002 post-Godhra riots case, in which three British nationals and another person were killed by a mob.

British citizens Saeed Dawood, Shakeel Dawood and Mohammad Aswat and their local driver Yusuf Suleiman were killed in the Prantij town in Gujarat’s Sabarkantha district on February 28, a day after the Sabarmati Express train burning incident.

According to the prosecution, they were travelling in a vehicle when they were intercepted by a mob and burnt alive. Another Briton, Imran Dawood, managed to escape with injuries. Imran and his three uncles were on a visit to India. They were returning from their native village of Lajpor near Navsari in Gujarat after visiting Agra and Jaipur.

The Supreme Court-appointed SIT had charged six persons Mithanbhai Patel, Chandu alias Prahlad Patel, Ramesh Patel, Manoj Patel, Rajesh Patel and Kalabhai Patel, all residents of Prantij, with murder and rioting. Principal District Judge I.C. Shah gave the benefit of the doubt to the accused as the prosecution was not able to prove the case “beyond reasonable doubt.”

The court rejected complainant Imran’s testimony as “doubtful” and “not believable” as he was “not sure” about the identity of the accused. His evidence “cannot be relied upon when it is also not corroborated by any other cogent evidence,” the court observed.

“Apart from the complainant’s non-cooperation, two eye-witnesses also turned hostile and did not support the prosecution’s case,” Special Public Prosecutor R.C. Kodekar told The Hindu.

The court concluded: “ … It seems there is no evidence on record from which it can be believed that the accused were members of unlawful assembly and involved in the commission of the crime.”

Six acquitted in post-Godhra riots case - The Hindu

--
read before postng
its decion by
A special SIT court in Himmatnagar

 

[syedali73]

life whaat,,,umm,,dont u know,,,hindus r incorrigible

They indeed are otherwise Jinnah did not have to leave the Congress.

so,decision of releasing someone accused of terrorism shud be done after proper scrutiny n not becoz a retired judge feels so.

It is not his feelings but an opinion he formulated after going through the case and examining the evidence. Please get into a habit of reading the post carefully before shooting in the dark.

I am highlighting the parts for those who perhaps find it difficult to understand how Justice Markandey reached to his conclusion: