What's new

Afghans flee shelling from Pakistan: official, witnesses

. .
I say they are.. Whether they are in Afghan border areas or in Pakistan's tribal belt. Hence I support these attacks by Pakistan in Afghanistan as well as the drone attacks/special op hits by NATO in Pakistan.

Let's see. We even doubt this story is true. Afghan administration is a big a liar as are some of their "friends" who don't even share a border with them.

We Pakistanis condemn civilian damage in any case and that's why we want our reaction to be limited and precise attacking training camps unlike a drone attacking markets and places of worship.
 
. .
Isn't there a prevailing issue of pashtuns in tribal areas refusing to receive bodies of slain officers/jawans following a directive from militant propaganda wings ?
nope never heard of it.......
 
. .
Are there 203mm shells?:what:
i thought maximum size in modern artillery was till 155mm?:undecided:

you forget it ?:D

qDDDI.jpg
 
.
Let's see. We even doubt this story is true. Afghan administration is a big a liar as are some of their "friends" who don't even share a border with them.

We Pakistanis condemn civilian damage in any case and that's why we want our reaction to be limited and precise attacking training camps unlike a drone attacking markets and places of worship.

Thats not what last few pages reflect.. But anyway, you are entitled to your opinion as am I.. :)

I agree with Karan.1970 here. Terrorists, where ever they are need to be targeted. There are some civilian deaths that take place, but thats acceptable collateral damage, as not killing the terrorists, will result in many times more civilian deaths as we are seeing regularly in Pakistan itself.
 
.
Thats not what last few pages reflect.. But anyway, you are entitled to your opinion as am I.. :)

Most Pakistanis are against civilian killings. Anyways the news looks a bit unauthentic.
 
. .
Most Pakistanis are against civilian killings. Anyways the news looks a bit unauthentic.

As caine said, go and look back the last few pages and posts by Pakistani members.. They kind of contradict you..
 
.
Every country has the right to defend itself. Whether its India,israel,afghanistan or pakistan.. But instead of chasing TTP, and bombing their hiding, they are bombing civilians its sheer frustation and shows their incompetence.
 
.
As caine said, go and look back the last few pages and posts by Pakistani members.. They kind of contradict you..

A few Pakistani members aren't the official representatives of state of Pakistan. State of Pakistan however condemns such "collateral damages". As such damages don't help fight terrorism. A prime example is Afghanistan itself. :)
 
. .
Impressive i just did a Google search the system are old 1950's and yes Pakistan has plenty of these weapon system.
How effective are they compared to 155mm, i had thought modern Calliber's had stabilized at 155mm.

RASI JAL GAI BAL NHI GYA ?


OHH BBHAI where you live ?

its M110


It first entered service with the US Army in 1963

Egyptian Army Received 144 M110A2 as aid in 1996

Royal Bahraini Army 13 M110A2 from Netherlands delivered in 1994 25 M110A2 from US delivered in 1996

PAKISTAN using some 260 units


also pakitan have 356 another 203MM artillery guns named M115 .

P1010288.JPG
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom