Icarus
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2009
- Messages
- 9,040
- Reaction score
- 78
- Country
- Location
Sir, popular reporting sometimes uses the wider definition of a missile, which can be anything that is "capable of being thrown or projected to strike a distant object", from bricks to ICBMs.
Eff-ing damn hell! I was just thinking about you! Been a while man!
As for the point in question, usually reporters can discern between artillery (commonly referred as shells) and Rocket/Missile/RPG Systems (commonly referred to as rockets) but I'm willing to accept that line of argument. However, if Pakistan is to fire 36 shells ONLY to make a point, then I am severely disappointed, our Artillery Corp is one of the finest I have seen, these boys can hit a cross marked 15 kilometres away if you give them the right co-ordinates. When they get going, they don't stop. 500 shells is the bare minimum. It's too much trouble to move your guns from their existing firing positions for 100 or so shells, 36 is just an outrage.