Afghanistan war: Just what was the point?

[Sky lord]

what you have are capitalist multi-party dictatorships that promote male homosexuality and mindless consumerism and obsession with the cell phone... of course, there is the breeding of reactionaries from the fake-muslim creed for use as terrorist drones against muslim-majority socialist countries and there is the support to anti-human foreign movements like the hindutva-championing bjp party that now controls the indian central government.

Eight adjectives in one sentence! Must be a record! By the time I got to the end of the sentence I got totally confused about who was the capatalist, the fake, the mindless and the anti human.

@Piper - one big plus point is that the American invasion really did make a difference to the lives of women from getting out from under the Taliban...at least in Kabul.

 

[jamahir]

Eight adjectives in one sentence! Must be a record! By the time I got to the end of the sentence I got totally confused about who was the capatalist, the fake, the mindless and the anti human.

@Piper - one big plus point is that the American invasion really did make a difference to the lives of women from getting out from under the Taliban...at least in Kabul.

you are among the mindless ones here for congratulating the usa government for invading afghanistan to supposedly remove the taliban when it was the usa government which encouraged the creation of taliban and fully was involved in creation of the taliban's predecessor, al-qaeda, or as many say, al-cia-da.

another cheerleader for usa government.

 

[Sky lord]

you are among the mindless ones here for congratulating the usa government for invading afghanistan to supposedly remove the taliban when it was the usa government which encouraged the creation of taliban and fully were involved in creation of the taliban's predecessor, al-qaeda, or as many say, al-cia-da.

another cheerleader for usa government.

I don't think even the american national who did the OP was mindlessly cheering for the USA. But to mindlessly say that everything the US does is bad is also a little mindless.

 

[raktaka]

@Piper - one big plus point is that the American invasion really did make a difference to the lives of women from getting out from under the Taliban...at least in Kabul.

Are you sure ?

This is Afghanistan in 1966

This is Afghanistan in 1977

This is Afghanistan under the Evil Communist USSR after it "invaded",

 

[raktaka]

This is After the US "Liberated" Afghanistan in 1990

This is Afghanistan a few years after it was "liberated" by the US,

,

This is Afghanistan Today,

I doubt they are jumping over each other to Thank the US.

I don't think even the american national who did the OP was mindlessly cheering for the USA. But to mindlessly say that everything the US does is bad is also a little mindless.

What the US does to the rest of the world is Bad, what the US does for its own people is good.

Too bad the rest of the world do not get to vote in US elections

 

[jamahir]

I don't think even the american national who did the OP was mindlessly cheering for the USA. But to mindlessly say that everything the US does is bad is also a little mindless.

she has posted a cnn article ( of all things ) that for the sake of "authenticity" has one line that says that usa invaded iraq in 2003... doesn't say that the iraq war was anti-human, doesn't speak about the cia origin of the anti-socialist afghan regime-change program and so on.

where does the article speak of the fact that george bush jr and tony b'liar are declared war-criminals concerning the iraq war, declared by the 'kuala lumpur war crimes commission'??

but it is cnn after all, one of the mouth pieces of usa government.

 

[Desertfalcon]

So when are you targeting Boko haram?
Or nigeria is not a strategic location so that dosen't count in American justice providing system?

Did Boko Haram attack America? See the difference? We DO provide Nigeria, Chad, etc., with assistance in fighting them, btw.

North korea is a bigger threat to USA than alqaeda or any terrorist organization will ever be, so why is American justice providing system fails their?

You mean like this?

United States Forces Korea

Too bad the rest of the world do not get to vote in US elections

Too bad so much of the rest of the world are not real men instead of whiny little titty-babies who can't take responsibility for their own countries and so cry and blame big, bad, mean ole' America for all their problems when she has to intervene. I’d rather be a hated American than a whinny little pussy, any day.

 

[jamahir]

Too bad so much of the rest of the world are not real men instead of whiny little titty-babies who can't take responsibility for their own countries and so cry and blame big, bad, mean ole' America for all their problems when she has to intervene. I’d rather be a hated American than a whinny little pussy, any day.

silly post.

 

[WaLeEdK2]

When the Taliban asked the US government to give proof that Osama did 9/11 the Americans refused. To this day have they given any such thing to them?

 

[jetray]

but the fact remains as long as Taliban have local sport and sanctuaries in neighbouring country who happens to be our ally the whole endeavour was doomed.

Which country would let its soldiers killed and provide aid to its enemy? US
Thats the whole problem, US knows that pakistan is doing exactly the same thing that they did for soviets. But instead of taking action they are just pandering to their interests.

Its seems US wants to remain in Afghanistan to control central asia, they have no interests in resolving the conflict whatsoever. For US military soldiers on ground pakistan is their enemy and for diplomats their ally.

 

[CHD]

@Desertfalcon So you are calling afghanistan a victory to its original US objective?
Afghan Taliban are as strong as they were before 9/11 if not stronger, its is due to this fact and americans utter failure that white house was forced to call them a party to afghan conflict and not terrorist group.
They still can take any area in afghanistan and control a large portion of afghanistan.
So where have i missed the point of Americans achieving its objectives and calling this a victory?

 

[Desertfalcon]

So where have i missed the point of Americans achieving its objectives and calling this a victory?

Did you not read my very first post in this thread? I don't know any American, including myself, who has called it a victory. Indeed, much of the point of my posts here was in arguing that in the case of terror, one can't measure "victory" in the same way that one does in a conventional war. Terrorism is something that is going to have to be constantly policed against. It takes decades and victories are often small, but the fight must go on. Pakistan is no different in it's war on terror. That is nothing against Pakistan anymore than it is against America. It's just the nature of that type of conflict.

 

[Zhukov]

Point is just Egos and power struggles. Rest is all rubbish.
"Kuffar waging war against Islam" Narrative
or
"We will fight till last terrorist" Side

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

but the people of egypt majorly rejected morsi and overthrew his ikhwaani terrorist government.

Not people of Egypt, Mubarak supporters. Muslim Brotherhood weren't a terrorist government, the only reason they are called so is because they support Hamas (Israel hates them) and Morsi was able to negotiate peace with Sinai insurgents. That's why after his government was thrown, the military government of SISI killed over hundreds of pro-Morsi protesters in a few days, to quell an uprising.

 

[jamahir]

Not people of Egypt, Mubarak supporters. Muslim Brotherhood weren't a terrorist government, the only reason they are called so is because they support Hamas (Israel hates them) and Morsi was able to negotiate peace with Sinai insurgents. That's why after his government was thrown, the military government of SISI killed over hundreds of pro-Morsi protesters in a few days, to quell an uprising.

the ikhwaanis and their south asian counterparts ( tableeghi jamaat ) are terrorists and related to each other... both have always been employed by nato for regime-change action against socialist/progressive governments in muslim-majority countries or against progressive muslims worldwide.

in truth, it is the tableeghi jamaat of south asia ( india, originally ) that is responsible directly and indirectly in the formation of most fake-muslim terrorist groups in the world, whether boko haram, whether jemah islamiya, whether taliban, whether hizb-ut-tahrir, and so on.

and do you mean it was people of mars who were your "mubarak supporters" and therefore overthrew morsi.

morsi was a dog of nato and one of the beneficiaries of the nato-arranged "arab spring" program... good that the caretaker government of sisi killed morsi supporters and jailed many more.