What's new

Afghanistan Is in Chaos. Is That What Hamid Karzai Wants?

Hiptullha

BANNED
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
4,706
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Afghanistan Is in
Chaos. Is That What
Hamid Karzai Wants?


Critics say the former president is working from the wings to destabilize his
successor’s government. He says he has no interest in returning to power.

By MUJIB MASHALAUG. 5, 2016

KABUL, Afghanistan — Hamid Karzai, the former Afghan president and current antagonist to his successor’s government, likes to describe Afghan politics as a marathon.


To the long roll call of visitors he meets each day — regional power brokers and elders, government officials, religious leaders, well-wishers who reminisce longingly about his years in power — the metaphor is clear. Mr. Karzai has never stopped running, never stopped maneuvering, and he won’t.


Mr. Karzai’s critics, especially those close to President Ashraf Ghani, accuse him of working from the wings to destabilize the government and exploit a moment of national crisis to try to return to power — or at least to force some concessions. They say Mr. Karzai is actively undermining a vulnerable president, maintaining an alternate pole of political influence and patronage, and stoking protest movements that some fear could turn violent.


So what is Mr. Karzai’s answer? He flatly denies that he is trying to harm the government. But then there’s the hint of a wry smile: “If there are some people running faster, those who are falling behind should not complain.”


Following Mr. Karzai through days of meetings — dozens of discussions, and interviews on and off camera — it becomes clear that he is still operating like a man in power.

Continue reading the main story
Photo
05karzai-web2-superJumbo.jpg

Mr. Karzai’s critics accuse him of working from the wings to destabilize the government and exploit a moment of national crisis to try to return to power. CreditAdam Ferguson for The New York Times

His many visitors come to seek his leverage in the government, and he is happy to pick up the telephone to call a minister, a governor or an ambassador. He still communicates with world leaders, signing letters to them on a weekly basis.


Much of Mr. Karzai’s politics happens around noon, when a larger crowd gathers for a group prayer on the grass outside and then follows him upstairs to a sunlit dining table for lunch. On a given day, there are former and current government officials, generals, judges, bankers, tribal elders, former members of the Taliban and preachers from Kabul’s major mosques.

A master storyteller and conversationalist, Mr. Karzai takes his seat at the head of the table.

“Who is raising this question out there, that I am returning?” Mr. Karzai began one recent conversation over stuffed peppers, vegetable rice, and chicken cooked with carrots. “I have made it clear I don’t want to.”


But that was good enough to stir a spirited conversation, full of anecdotes about his days in power and how people do not trust the current government. One former cabinet minister, who still serves as an adviser to Mr. Ghani, insisted that Mr. Karzai was the only natural alternative, and a great hope to the 90 percent of the country disenchanted with the current government.


Mr. Karzai listened attentively. He took another bite.

He seems to invite the question hanging over him: If Mr. Karzai does not want to return to power, just what is he trying to achieve by increasing pressure on a government already on the brink?

Facebook Live Interview with Hamid Karzai


And it is on the brink. In private conversations, Afghan and Western officials alike worry that Mr. Ghani’s administration may be facing an existential crisis that could peak as soon as next month.


The end of September is the deadline for the government to meet the commitments of a political deal brokered by Secretary of State John Kerry after the catastrophic 2014 election dispute. By then, Afghanistan is supposed to hold parliamentary elections, enact sweeping electoral reforms, and amend the Constitution to create the position of prime minister for Mr. Ghani’s election rival and current governing partner, Abdullah Abdullah. But staying on schedule was already impossible many months ago, and Mr. Kerry has publicly insisted that Mr. Ghani’s government will remain through the end of its five-year term, regardless.


That is just the beginning. The country’s security situation is worsening, despite the American military’s increased involvement in the fighting. The Taliban have seized many districts, and they threaten to take many more.


Mr. Ghani, the constant technocrat, has been forced to focus on security, and his economic initiatives have stalled. And suddenly he has also been challenged by a street protest movement in which ethnic Hazaras are accusing his government of systematic discrimination.


The most recent of the demonstrations was struck by a suicide bombing, claimed by the Islamic State, that left at least 80 people dead. Now the demonstrators accuse the government of purposely leaving them vulnerable to attack, and they have given Mr. Ghani an ultimatum to meet their demands — another September deadline, as it turns out.

Continue reading the main story


In Afghanistan, John Kerry Seeks End to Bickering of Unity Government APRIL 9, 2016

Continue reading the main story


Mr. Karzai’s push for a loya jirga is the move most widely seen as a game plan for returning to power, or at least for negotiating more leverage. His strength is with the tribes and the power brokers he has maintained at his side, while Mr. Ghani has alienated many of them.


It helps to understand that Mr. Karzai represents an entire network of power — national as well as local — accumulated over 13 years and beyond. That network feels that it is slowly being uprooted under Mr. Ghani’s presidency, and that it could be vastly weakened if the current government survives the September deadline intact.

Continue reading the main story

Photo
05karzai-web4-superJumbo.jpg

Mr. Karzai visited a ceremony for ethnic Hazaras killed in a recent suicide bombing.CreditAdam Ferguson for The New York Times

In Kandahar, powerful strongmen who owe their rise to Mr. Karzai’s protection have had standoffs recently with officials sent by Mr. Ghani over lucrative custom taxes and where the money goes. A northern lawmaker who stopped by to see Mr. Karzai complained that the government was cutting her off and working “so beautifully and systematically” to weaken their mutual support base. She might not return from vacation abroad, she said, if the situation continued and Mr. Karzai did not signal his plan clearly.


If it came to an open political struggle, it is unclear whether Mr. Ghani would be able to score points with what would be perhaps his best case to make against Mr. Karzai: that the seeds of the current security and political crises were sown on Mr. Karzai’s watch, and that the former president left him a system suffocating in corruption and patronage.


That is in part because Mr. Karzai has been busy using his social acumen to try to shed a more favorable light on his legacy after 13 years in power.

Mr. Karzai, who lives a stone’s throw from the presidential palace, says his routine has changed little since he was president. He has more free time to relax in the afternoons, but his mornings are busier. He meets more people than he did when he was in power. On average, his office estimated, Mr. Karzai sees more than 400 people a month. Every Eid, three-day Muslim celebrations that come twice a year, Mr. Karzai opens his gates to a flow of visitors, reaching up to 6,000 people.


From the moment he leaves his residence in the morning, his two young daughters tugging at his trousers, he is a man on the move, trailed by secret service agents. Mr. Karzai, 58, describes himself as hyperactive, and he is rail-thin. He drinks four or five espressos a day.

Continue reading the main story
Photo
05karzai-web5-superJumbo.jpg

“The Americans, whose primary slogan is democracy, are making a sham of democracy in Afghanistan,” Mr. Karzai said. CreditAdam Ferguson for The New York Times

He still moves with ease among drastically different groups of people, from Oruzgan elders who interrupt him with passionate diatribes, to groups of youths coming to present him with their latest research.


Mr. Karzai makes them laugh, and when they shed tears, as one group visiting from central Afghanistan did during a recent audience, he offers tissues.


As for what he might be seeking from all of this, Western officials in Kabul acknowledge that Mr. Karzai, a masterful tactician and politician, does not necessarily need to have a clear concept of what he wants. He can mount pressure on the government in ways big and small, throw many irons in the fire, and perhaps force a critical blunder from Mr. Ghani.


But Mr. Ghani is not without resources. Much will depend on how many opposition figures the president can co-opt to keep Mr. Karzai at least partly on the margins.


Mr. Karzai reserves his sharpest criticism of the government for what he considers its biggest sin: cozying up, “immensely, sadly,” to the United States and relying on it for its survival.

Today’s Headlines: Asia Edition
Get news and analysis from Asia and around the world delivered to your inbox every day in the Asian morning.



Mr. Karzai, who sent flowers to the American ambassador for the Fourth of July and then signed a thank-you note to the ambassador for thanking him, said in an interview with The New York Times last week that “the Americans, whose primary slogan is democracy, are making a sham of democracy in Afghanistan.”

He is not fundamentally against the American presence, he says: He just wants them to stop bombing his country and interfering in the political process, which he accused Mr. Kerry of doing in the spring when he insisted on a full-term Ghani government.


“This is a blatant interference to undermine the sovereignty of Afghanistan,” Mr. Karzai said in the interview. “Look at this country: What do we have other than our pride and sovereignty? Then someone comes — from a good place, America — stands here in our country to determine the duration of our government as he sees fit? That is an insult.”


Meanwhile, the streams of visitors continue, and Mr. Karzai regales them with parables that at times seem like bids for redemption, and at others like foresight.


During one lunch, he told a story of a group of tired travelers in a desert who see a fire in the distance and hear drums. Men are dancing the circle-dance called Attan. The travelers decide to spend the night there, and to make their hosts feel comfortable, they join in the dance.

But the dance stretches on and on.

“One of the travelers is wise, he realizes it is the devil’s dance and it will go on all night,” Mr. Karzai told the guests. “When the morning comes, there would be no sign of a dance or the devils.”


He paused, then drove the point home: “We are stuck in the dance of the devil,” he said, to chuckles. “When the sun rises, the devils will be gone, but we will be left in this dry land.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/world/asia/afghanistan-hamid-karzai.html?_r=0
 
.
Pride ??U have Pride?When foreign forces attack Afghanistan u and northern alliance were acting like their puppets.Only Afghan Taliban fought against them and now u r talking about Pride??U kill so many Afghan Taliban who were fighting against Americans.Bloody dog.u r not sincere with your country.Even dogr r better then u...
 
.
Lets continue with Karzai then. This one from the Guardian of London.

US airstrikes undermining Afghan security, says former president

Hamid Karzai says commanders fighting Taliban who ask US military ‘to bomb Afghanistan are not representing the Afghan people’



Hamid Karzai. Photograph: David Levene for the Guardian
Sune Engel Rasmussen in Kabul

Thursday 4 August 2016



International efforts to help Afghan security forces regain control of territory taken by the Taliban are doing more harm than good, the former president of Afghanistan has warned.

Hamid Karzai spoke to the Guardian after a bloody week in Helmand, as the Taliban captured large swaths of territory where hundreds of British and American soldiers died.

As militants close in on the provincial capital, Lashkar Gah, government forces have sustained heavy losses. Afghan commanders have pleaded with the US military to intensify airstrikes. But, Karzai said, they should not.

“They are very wrong – they are terribly wrong,” he said. “Those who ask foreign forces to bomb Afghanistan are not representing the Afghan people or their interests.”

2500.jpg


The comments echo sentiments expressed by the ex-president during his 13-year tenure. Karzai vehemently opposed US airstrikes and night raids on Afghan villages, which he thinks undermined Afghan sovereignty, along with foreign “interference” in Afghan politics.

This denial of self-determination causes a lot of frustration and anger for the Afghan people, and that helps fuel conflict,” Karzai said.

The US disagrees that its military is making things worse – as does the current Afghan government. Last month, Barack Obama announced his decision to leave 8,900 soldiers in the country until 2017, further delaying a long-planned drawdown.

A recent report showed the amount of territory controlled by the Afghan government has fallen this year, dropping from 70.5% of the country’s districts in early 2016 to 65.6%.




Afghan special force members take part in a night military operation against Taliban in the Nad Ali district of Helmand. Photograph: Xinhua / Barcroft Images
In the past week in Helmand, where 410 of the 455 killed British soldiers in Afghanistan died, Nad Ali district was almost entirely overrun, bringing the Taliban close to Lashkar Gah. The government is almost completely absent from northern districts such as Musa Qala, Sangin and Kajaki.

But Karzai said those losses should be accepted as the consequence of Afghan forces fighting alone.

“If we cannot fight it ourselves, then we cannot ask a foreign force to come take it for us,” he said. “Those who take it have more ownership than we have.”

The former president said foreign forces should either leave Afghanistan to deal with its own internal conflict, or focus on the Taliban’s foreign backers in Pakistan, who Karzai blames equally for Afghanistan’s woes.

Karzai’s relationship with the US, who originally supported him as a spearhead for post-Taliban Afghanistan, soured so much that in 2013 Karzai refused to sign a security agreement allowing foreign troops to stay in the country.

His latest remarks are also a stab at current president Ashraf Ghani who signed the security agreement as one of his first acts after taking office in 2014, and who is nurturing a much closer relationship to US commanders.

“I have asked the Afghan government not to ask the US for aerial bombings of our country,” Karzai said. “This is chemicals thrown on the country every day. This is killing our fields, spreading disease, and not bringing an end to the war.”

Since his presidential retirement in 2014, Karzai never disappeared from political life. He remains influential, receiving throngs of visitors, including foreign ambassadors, at his central Kabul office. Some see his vocal presence in the fringes as undermining the government.

Karzai himself denied exerting pressure on the government “yet”, without elaborating on what that implied.

Many think Karzai is hardly blameless himself. Corruption is arguably the biggest ill tormenting Afghanistan, undermining its security forces and spurring public support for the Taliban. The corruption, while bankrolled largely by the inflow of foreign funds, was allowed to flourish under Karzai, and has so far proven impossible to curtail.

But western corruption allegations are out of proportion, Karzai retorted. Daily corruption in Afghanistan is comparable to other weak states, while large scale corruption “is a direct result of the US approach to Afghanistan, and the way they issued contracts”, he said.

Though Karzai emphasised that he is not “anti-western”, and that he is “very, very sorry” for British lives lost in Afghanistan, he warned that if foreign forces don’t change approach, those soldiers may have died for nothing.

“Nato has been here for 14 years,” he said, adding that foreign forces are fighting for the same districts as they were when they had 150,000 troops. “Are we better off? Do we have more security? No.

“It means something is wrong. The way things are done, it has been in vain for us.”
 
Last edited:
.
@A-Team any thoughts.

Seems like your ex president is getting a lot of attention from Western media these days.
 
.
@A-Team any thoughts.

Seems like your ex president is getting a lot of attention from Western media these days.

He belongs to the past, as an ex-president we respect him but he is a spent force and not relevant anymore.
 
.
He belongs to the past, as an ex-president we respect him but he is a spent force and not relevant anymore.

Hmmm
Although the Guardian and many other observers seem to think otherwise. As an example
Since his presidential retirement in 2014, Karzai never disappeared from political life. He remains influential, receiving throngs of visitors, including foreign ambassadors, at his central Kabul office. Some see his vocal presence in the fringes as undermining the government.

Karzai himself denied exerting pressure on the government “yet”, without elaborating on what that implied.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom