Capt.Popeye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 11,937
- Reaction score
- 12
So you are agreeing that heading is wrong..... Afghanistan can never export or import directly (except from its neighbors) being a land locked country. There will always be a middle man for Afghanistan... This is another matter who is more reliable and who is not.....
No; I am not agreeing at all. You are seeing the word "directly" in a very limited "school-boyish way".
In trade terms; "direct" means something else.
Direct Trade is Trade that is directly arranged for and controlled by the two parties concerned. I.E. in all its implications, negotiations, setting of conditions and tariffs, arranging finances such as L.Cs, deciding what items to be traded etc etc.
That trade can pass through any mode(s) of transport or through any countries of transit. E.G. India trades with Switzerland (another land-locked country), part of that trade passes through the port of Genoa in Italy. But Italy has nothing to with the trade itself apart from recovering transit costs and taxes/duties. Italy cannot stop that trade.
That is Direct Trade. Similarly Nepal does Direct Trade with BD; though it passes through India.
Better informed now about Direct Trade?
Using the term middleman is ok to some extent. Because it is simply a "non-technical one". But Pakistan is some what of a middleman because it has tried to put barriers in Indo-Afghan trade.