Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Its constitutionally defined at 5%. Its not removed from anywhere else. Also, for your information this typically goes unutilised.
The objective of this program is not to bring change now. The amount of goodwill created by students who have studied and left is not calculable. Take a simple example on this forum. People from Pakistan who have traveled abroad and studied in another culture have a better appreciation of that culture. So in a simple phrase. It works. Takes time, but. works.
Like I said in my first fact. We are not.
And why should we take the decision on whether they will want to study or not. If they don't want to, it anyway goes back to the general quota. To give you an example, the person debunking the myth of languages is a Pakistani, not an American or foreigner.
Would be nice to know @Joe Shearer view on this.
Could not agree with you more. There has been some considerable discussion within our own university about this article, with some professors asking indignantly why we don't get more of these young people to study with us. I am in the middle of writing a report for the Council on our enrolment methods and possible changes, but if I can, I will add some extracts from internal memos on this subject.
Last edited by a moderator: