PARIKRAMA
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/groupcaptain.jpg)
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,871
- Reaction score
- 185
- Country
- Location
The Great Aero India 2015 Tamaasha (Part 3 - parted as image per upload is 8 only)
TRISHUL: The Great Aero India 2015 Tamaasha
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-kDx_7Pl57s0%2FVOCsrxLBB9I%2FAAAAAAAAI_0%2FsZn-Tb7IZjY%2Fs1600%2FImported%252Bcomponents%252Bby%252BHAL-7.JPG&hash=06d0242804e357d4dc1889eb45599a8b)
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-fVHo7N_u__8%2FVOCs-XW_TjI%2FAAAAAAAAI_8%2FWAHR-AIVlQE%2Fs1600%2FImported%252Bcomponents%252Bby%252BHAL-8.JPG&hash=3013035dc7c803c386953528da501c52)
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-KrpI1cR08Po%2FVOCtZxChkkI%2FAAAAAAAAJAE%2FMMI1b64suMA%2Fs1600%2FImported%252Bcomponents%252Bby%252BHAL-9.JPG&hash=06721f7d94d5c3280ebb1232c86f48ee)
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-4lkgh9-Z6S8%2FVOCt2SzjjbI%2FAAAAAAAAJAU%2FqTjt60r9RYA%2Fs1600%2FImported%252Bcomponents%252Bby%252BHAL-11.JPG&hash=9dae6cea5b13569214ef9dc614867dc6)
Similarly, what will be the claimed indigenisation by weight, by volume, by cost, and by technological content of the HAL -developed Light Utility Helicopter’s (LUH) and Light Combat Helicopter’s (LCH)?
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-m8NG8zQooCs%2FVOCupGIwuEI%2FAAAAAAAAJAc%2Fl_3_cSDIZt8%2Fs1600%2FLCH%252BTD-3.jpg&hash=e9628c09698bc63ca90e79f53299faa5)
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-GgdRywEGyKo%2FVOCu146C_oI%2FAAAAAAAAJAk%2FVjTaUdfF_ew%2Fs1600%2FImported%252Bcomponents%252Bby%252BHAL-1.JPG&hash=8057bfa990dbed80b1fd77bfd9ae6114)
Which entity—HAL or the DRDO’s Aeronautical development Agency (ADA)—should be primarily responsible for commercially marketing the Tejas family of multi-role combat aircraft (MRCA)? And this is why I’m asking this question: If a certain customer, let’s say Egypt, is interested in procuring the Tejas Mk1 MRCA’s tandem-seater version configured as a lead-in-fighter trainer (LIFT), but it wants to procure the aircraft with non-Israeli multi-mode pulse-Doppler radars, helmet-mounted displays and laser designation pods, which entity should be held accountable for delivering the customer-specified end-product: HAL, the aircraft manufacturer, or ADA, the aircraft designer-cum-systems integrator?
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-FX1hK8hzdAI%2FVOCvRtTn6aI%2FAAAAAAAAJAs%2FD-th40VYF3Q%2Fs1600%2FTejas%252BMk1%252BMRCA.jpg&hash=da81c22dcea73f14151605d0ddd30453)
TRISHUL: The Great Aero India 2015 Tamaasha
Similarly, what will be the claimed indigenisation by weight, by volume, by cost, and by technological content of the HAL -developed Light Utility Helicopter’s (LUH) and Light Combat Helicopter’s (LCH)?
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-m8NG8zQooCs%2FVOCupGIwuEI%2FAAAAAAAAJAc%2Fl_3_cSDIZt8%2Fs1600%2FLCH%252BTD-3.jpg&hash=e9628c09698bc63ca90e79f53299faa5)
Which entity—HAL or the DRDO’s Aeronautical development Agency (ADA)—should be primarily responsible for commercially marketing the Tejas family of multi-role combat aircraft (MRCA)? And this is why I’m asking this question: If a certain customer, let’s say Egypt, is interested in procuring the Tejas Mk1 MRCA’s tandem-seater version configured as a lead-in-fighter trainer (LIFT), but it wants to procure the aircraft with non-Israeli multi-mode pulse-Doppler radars, helmet-mounted displays and laser designation pods, which entity should be held accountable for delivering the customer-specified end-product: HAL, the aircraft manufacturer, or ADA, the aircraft designer-cum-systems integrator?
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-FX1hK8hzdAI%2FVOCvRtTn6aI%2FAAAAAAAAJAs%2FD-th40VYF3Q%2Fs1600%2FTejas%252BMk1%252BMRCA.jpg&hash=da81c22dcea73f14151605d0ddd30453)
Last edited: