Namer Afzal Khan
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- May 11, 2016
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Have you ever read the verse of the blood money. If yes please quote it and if no then please read it. I think you don't have the knowledge about this topic and yet you are talking against it. I seriously don't get one thing that secular people are non practising Muslims who keep on criticizing the religion even when they don't have any knowledge about it. I think from now on we should also mention "secular" as a religion on all of the official forms.Nope our blood money law freed him we didnt have one he wouldve never been free our law provided him the loop because according to that law relatives can pardon a killer which is wrong
You must be talking about post world war 1 era. Atatürk was a secular person. If a ruler does something it doesn't mean that his/her whole nation support his/her decision. Replacing the shariah law with some other law is a crimeI'm not making fun at all. I'm asking a serious question: do you consider the Ottoman abandonment of sharia to be a form of treason to the Ottoman's people or state or not?
Come on! What type of question is this. Even US can't do anything without oil/gas/money. It has nothing to do with the religion. Why Jinnah didn't name it as "Islamic republic" is similar to asking a question from a Muslim named as let's say Usman "hey usman, why didn't your father named you " Muslim Usman". It shows that your father wanted you to be a secular person."And that is why your country is going backward instead of forward,because you(the majority) dont see or want to see whats wrong.
Name one ''Islamist'' country doing well without oil/gas money.
Here is a solution. We should asked the government to mention "secular" in the religion section of all the official forms.