A Strategic Sunnah & A Way Forward For Kashmir + Announcements By Sheikh Imran N Hosein - 10/03/2019

[Zhukov]

Why are we so reactive when it comes to discussing Difference of Opinnions.
I used to be an avid follower of this sheikh once. But he kept weaving more theories every month and interweaving everything into a web That have no explanation and becomes too complex to explain. I finally stopped following him as a sheikh and only read his material as any other books.
He went Totally Bonkers when he was advocating that Pakistan Army SHAMELESSLY did Operation Against the Tribal militias in north and supported USA in Afghanistan. And that The Afghani Nation will become the Iron Backed Soldiers of Imam Mahdi and so on. And that we all should leave the civilization and form Isolated Villages totally cut off from the system grow our own food etc etc etc.(Anyone remember the Arrivals Series?)

Anyways his argument regarding fall of Constantinople to Ottomans is very Interesting. that the Invasion and Capture of Istanbul by Sultan Fateh from Byzantines and conversion of Hega Sophia into a mosque was a turning point for Christianity and the center of Influence shifted to Rome which he considers the Evil Christianity and Made Rome the Undisputed Champion of Christianity and the Good Christianity Withered away giving way to Pro Zionist Christians of Modern Age. And that we should befriend the Christians but the Russian Christians who are Orthodox (As per him) Against the Catholics.
But then he again goes bonkers that Israel will be the next Super Power after USA with mighty robotics Armies overtaking the world.
Also his research regarding Cyrus The Persian as Zulqarnain mentioned in Holy Quran and Gog Magog is worth reading.
He is a mix bag. Some interesting theories some Completely Nut head ones. But definitely not someone to follow and preach for.

 

[litman]

He does not hate Pakistan or Pakistanis. He just wishes they actually followed Islam authentically. He disagrees with Allama Iqbal's view that the Republican State can be an authentic substitute of Khilafa. He studied in Pakistan under a Pakistani teacher whom he loved dearly. He even worked in Pakistani as the headteacher of his institute for a short while.

He is correct that Muslims ought to condemn the oppression by Muslims. I disagree with him, in the sense he blames the Mughals for the oppression when Muslim dynasties before them committed oppression. I think he also needs to read up more on their history as many 'Hindus' fought in defence of the Mughals against rebellious Muslims. It seems he also things that Mughals expanded Islam into India, when it was Muslim dynasties that did this centuries before the Mughals existed.
It seems that Sheikh sees 'Hindus' as monolithic and this is what the RSS has achieved in Bharat. They have exaggerated the oppressions to generate further ill feeling towards Muslims for their eschatological purposes. I wish he would learn more about this....but he is right from a strategic P.O.V, Muslims need to build bridges between those 'Hindus' who have no intrinsic hate for Muslims vs those 'Hindus' who cannot accept that 'Hindus' of old accepted Islam and went their way. If this can be done that a lot can be achieved...
The RSS after the (re)creation of Bharat by the British, are trying to now foster a monolithic view on 'Hindus' something that has not really existed at least for two millennia. If we feed into this, like what some Muslim rulers of India (Subcontinent) have done at times, we will be helping the RSS.

By the way he was very impressed with the Pakistani government's diplomacy regarding the Bharati attack and capture of their pilot. This is the strategy that we need to adopt more often...

Regarding him leaving the Tanzeem, it was not just he was told to expand his area (by the way it is not wrong to be a specialist in one or two fields), he was told not to publicly speak on Gog and Magog and Dajjal by Dr Israr. It was this 'gagging' that caused him to regretfully leave as he felt it his duty as an Islamic scholar to educate his people on these most important of topics.


It burns us when he exposes our shortcomings. This is not to say that he expects us to agree with his opinion unless we are convinced of him being correct. Also he makes mistakes as he himself admits.


Except that he does not say become hippies and be unconcerned with the world...this is just your interpretation of what he says....he is thinking strategically....long term... the Muslim village is where you can practice Islam most fully and raise your children properly so when they become of age they can deal with the "modern world" in a dynamic yet orthodox manner....

i listened to his last lecture and i think he should also question hazrat umar for expanding the msulim empire till the far corner of africa. i think no body invited muslims to invade their lands. he also fails to understand that during the muslim rule in the suncontinent there were many sufis and saints wo spread the message of islam in the subcontinent otherwise we would have been hindus or sikhs. he totally fails to understand the concept of offensive jihad and the conditions required to be fulfilled before offensive jihad. i also couldnt understand what was his suggestion for the kashmiris. he simply rejects the hadiths which doesnt fit in his theory. his latest theory of two religions towards the end of the world which he presents most likely to please the orthodox christians seems to be totally wrong. i remember one of his video with "saker" who is an orthodox christian and i admire saker as he said in his face that yes there are fundamental differences between the orthodox christians and muslims and he defended his people and his religion at that time .i have been hearing him for past many years. his knowledge about gog magog, dajjal and riba is very logical but now i think he has lost it.

 

[Nefarious]

Got a few mates who follow him, they go out their way against Ottomans/Constantinople - Istanbul episode. Blindly loving Russia who is only looking out for their own interests and not some Muslim saviour. I think he's steering his audience knowingly or unknowingly, either way he's causing division.

Some of the stuff he says makes sense but I've been put off by some material and his followers.