What's new

A Soviet physicist is behind all of America’s stealth

undercover JIX

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
A Soviet physicist is behind all of America’s stealth
Logan Nye
Posted On August 20, 2020 17:25:20

origin.jpg


Pyotr Ufimtsev was a scientist associated with a number of prestigious universities and labs in Moscow. Listen to a few of the institutions he was at, and it becomes pretty clear what his primary interests were. He worked at the Central Research Radio Engineering Institute, the Institute of Fundamental Technical Problems, the Moscow Aviation Institute, the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics of Academy of Sciences, and more.

origin.jpg

The Northrop B-2 Spirit.

Notice the combination there? Aviation, radio engineering, and technical problems? That’s because he was very interested in how radio waves reflected off of objects; how radar actually worked at the most detailed and precise levels. He didn’t know it, but his work would put him at the forefront of a new American industry: stealth engineering.

Ufimtsev wrote a number of important papers as he studied exactly how radio waves bounced off of two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects. One of the most interesting things he found was that it wasn’t just the size of an object that determined how it appeared on radar; shape was actually more important.

And certain shapes were unlikely to reflect much energy back to the radar, meaning you could make a large object appear very small if you just gave it the right shape.

Much of Ufimtsev’s work was quietly translated into English where a number of American scientists read it. A 1962 paper translated as Method of Edge Waves in the Physical Theory of Diffraction was of particular interest. Many U.S. scientists simply saw the paper and incorporated it into their own research, or they rebuffed it and went about their day. But there was one team of engineers who saw the paper and saw it as potentially groundbreaking.

Lockheed engineers working in the “Skunk Works” division, the same engineers who made America’s first jet fighter during World War II, saw the chance to create something entirely new and novel. What if they could create an entire plane with the shapes and materials that sent little energy back to a radar?

Such a plane could be large, like the size of a bomber or fighter, but would show up on radar as a little bit of electromagnetic noise. It would be invisible as long as no one knew to look for it, and it would still be challenging to detect even after its existence was disclosed.
origin.jpg

(U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Thomas Barley)

Best of all, the growing number of homing missiles that American pilots would face would become essentially useless. Homing missiles needed a strong radar signal to get within range of an enemy target before switching to a seeker built into the missile. This process would almost certainly not work against a stealth aircraft, making the pilots much safer.

There were plenty of possible uses for such a plane, but Lockheed started by building a ground-attack plane, though they further camouflaged the program by labeling it a fighter, the F-117 Nighthawk dubbed the “Stealth Fighter.” The same lessons were later used in the B-2 bomber and are now present—in new forms—the F-22 and F-35. And some of Ufimtsev’s work will undoubtedly be recognizable in the B-21 Raider.

Other branches have gotten in on the stealth made possible by Ufimtsev, like the Navy with its Sea Shadow project that created stealthy boats.

Ufimtsev has gotten recognition from the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation, and even the U.S. for his work. He has been named to prestigious positions at universities like UCLA in California.

 
.
Modern stealth aircraft are undetectable in 5 main areas: visual, acoustic, heat, infrared, and radar. In this site we will focus on the last area, radar.

Making up ninety percent of what makes an aircraft stealthy is its shape. Through a combination of angles called planform shaping.

American aerospace engineers began to research and test these planform or stealth shapes as early as the late 1940’s but it was not until the 1950’s when a little know book by a Russian physicist surfaced in the United States that stealthy shapes were first derived and used.

The book by Pyotr Ufimtsev entitled "Method of Edge Waves In The Physical Theory of Diffraction" became known by many aerospace engineers as the “Rosetta Stone” of the stealth shape. Ufimtsev was able to provide calculations on how radio waves reflected off of different shapes.

Since radar, or RAdio Detection And Ranging, is an electromagnetic radio wave that is emitted by a radar antenna. It was easy to apply Ufimtsev’s equations to radar. Radar is used to identify the range, altitude, direction, or speed of, in this case, an aircraft. To find these v

alues a radar transmitter, transmits radio-frequency (RF) radiation. The RF radiation is a high powered radio wave that is able to travel great distances. It was found that when a radar wave strikes a 90 degree surface they scatter and a fraction of them reflect back to the radar antenna. Using the equation to the left, a radar system can then calculate the size of an object and determine whether or not to display it as a threat or discard it as interference.

The way it determines what is interference is by the size of the object or in other words what the so called radar cross-section (RCR) of the target is. A 747 has a huge RCR and would light up a radar operator’s screen while a F-22 has a RCR of a small bird and would be filtered out of most radar receivers as background noise. Designers of stealth aircraft found that if they could change the surface of an aircraft to reflect radar signals away from a radar receiver then they could make an aircraft invisible to radar.

This concept is clearly evident in the F-117 Nighthawk and its very unique shape. See more in the “U.S. First Generation Designs” section.


So how is the shape of the aircraft made?

Well this is where we get into the Top Secret stuff. In short, only government engineers and a privileged few know the answer to that
wp7cb8d699.png
question. All we know is what I said to the left, that the “stealth shape” is made to minimize right angles so when RF signals strike the aircraft surface they are not reflected back to their source as seen below.

The last part that makes an aircraft stealthy to radar is what makes up the skin of the aircraft. The radar absorbent material or RAM is a type of paint that absorbs RF signals and effectively prevents them from going back to their source. Again, the make up of RAM is also classified.

1608168056392.png

 
.
Link to complete Article is provided at the end, as origin of the Stealth Technology is the main topic, I will just copy the part..


ORIGINS

The roots of stealth can be traced to experimental aircraft of the 1940s, particularly Jack Northrop’s fabled YB-49 flying wing, which had smooth surfaces and rounded edges but no tail or fuselage. The all-wing configuration generated a relatively small image on radar screens, but that was of no great interest at the time, and the YB-49 was canceled in 1949.

In an obscure technical paper in the 1960s, Russian physicist Pyotr Ufimtsev theorized that electromagnetic waves bouncing off a flat surface could be calculated and used to estimate the return on radar. His findings were ignored by everyone, including the Russians.

By the 1970s, bombers and fighters were increasingly vulnerable to radar-controlled air defenses. In 1974, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Air Force began a major effort to develop combat aircraft with low radar signatures.

Two of the principal aircraft companies, McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics, were occupied on the new F-15 and F-16 fighters so the tasking for stealth fell to Lockheed and Northrop. Both of them were awarded contracts in 1975 to build static models for the Experimental Survivable Testbed (XST).



Even Russians dismissed and ignored this genius, but later Americans pick it up and made good use of it.
 
.
Link to complete Article is provided at the end, as origin of the Stealth Technology is the main topic, I will just copy the part..


ORIGINS

The roots of stealth can be traced to experimental aircraft of the 1940s, particularly Jack Northrop’s fabled YB-49 flying wing, which had smooth surfaces and rounded edges but no tail or fuselage. The all-wing configuration generated a relatively small image on radar screens, but that was of no great interest at the time, and the YB-49 was canceled in 1949.

In an obscure technical paper in the 1960s, Russian physicist Pyotr Ufimtsev theorized that electromagnetic waves bouncing off a flat surface could be calculated and used to estimate the return on radar. His findings were ignored by everyone, including the Russians.

By the 1970s, bombers and fighters were increasingly vulnerable to radar-controlled air defenses. In 1974, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Air Force began a major effort to develop combat aircraft with low radar signatures.

Two of the principal aircraft companies, McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics, were occupied on the new F-15 and F-16 fighters so the tasking for stealth fell to Lockheed and Northrop. Both of them were awarded contracts in 1975 to build static models for the Experimental Survivable Testbed (XST).



Even Russians dismissed and ignored this genius, but later Americans pick it up and made good use of it.
It is one thing to come up with the science or physics. it is another thing to make it into a concrete product
 
.
It is one thing to come up with the science or physics. it is another thing to make it into a concrete product
Yes, but first step is to recognize and accept the theory and work on it.

Russians ignored it, but Americans made it work. proves Science does not belong to any one, it needs theory, research and experiments.
 
.
Yes, but first step is to recognize and accept the theory and work on it.

Russians ignored it, but Americans made it work. proves Science does not belong to any one, it needs theory, research and experiments.

Even if Soviets or Russians realized the science they lack the engineering chops to make a B-2, F-22 or F-35
Do not get me wrong. I have extremely high regard for the Russian scientific and engineering talent
 
.
Even if Soviets or Russians realized the science they lack the engineering chops to make a B-2, F-22 or F-35
Do not get me wrong. I have extremely high regard for the Russian scientific and engineering talent
Imperialism/capitalism made the aircraft you mention, not engineering.
 
.
Imperialism/capitalism made the aircraft you mention, not engineering.

Engineering is not just individual engineers working. It is about teamwork, organizations and overall system. I won't say Capitalism produces better teamwork and organizations than communism. But USA has produced better organizations both in public and private sector than Soviet Union.
 
. .
It is one thing to come up with the science or physics. it is another thing to make it into a concrete product

Hi,

Not top be disrespectful to you---. Your comments hold true for India---but not for the SKUNKWORKS----.

That is the place where the impossible becomes possible---. Where dream becomes a reality---. Where an illusion seeks to take shape into real.
Engineering is not just individual engineers working. It is about teamwork, organizations and overall system. I won't say Capitalism produces better teamwork and organizations than communism. But USA has produced better organizations both in public and private sector than Soviet Union.

Hi,

It is actually about INDIVIDUALS---the individual brings in the idea---theory---the application---the team follows up on it and builds it into reality---.

The US understands the INDIVIDUAL---the top performer---the superstar---the one and only---that is how the US system is built up---. It props the individual up and then there is a line of those who follow in the footsteps to project his position.

The Israelis have learnt to do the same---. The team follows up on the LEAD of the individual.
 
.
It is actually about INDIVIDUALS---the individual brings in the idea---theory---the application---the team follows up on it and builds it into reality---.

INDIVIDUAL works for the govvernment, enterprise or organization. They have to respect and support the individual. I am sure the B-1 or F-117 projects had hundreds of individuals working on the project.

You look at successes. What happens when your projects fails. At worst you lose your job. I am not sure what happens in USSR, North Korea and China of the world.
 
.
Hi,

Not top be disrespectful to you---. Your comments hold true for India---but not for the SKUNKWORKS----.

That is the place where the impossible becomes possible---. Where dream becomes a reality---. Where an illusion seeks to take shape into real.

You are looking at a narrow field - aerospace engineering. There are a lot of things where science is known but the concrete product has to wait for the evolution of technology

A great example is the GUI on the computer screen. Someone invented it in the 1960s. It is only in the 1980s with fast microprocessors it became ubiquitous.
 
.
And Germans behind the space program of both soviets and Americans.

But much more overwhelmingly for US compared to soviets.
Even if Soviets or Russians realized the science they lack the engineering chops to make a B-2, F-22 or F-35
Do not get me wrong. I have extremely high regard for the Russian scientific and engineering talent

Great scientific and technical expertise with poor quality instrument and materials mixed with lack of funds is a dangerous combination. Case in point Chernobyl.
 
.
INDIVIDUAL works for the govvernment, enterprise or organization. They have to respect and support the individual. I am sure the B-1 or F-117 projects had hundreds of individuals working on the project.

You look at successes. What happens when your projects fails. At worst you lose your job. I am not sure what happens in USSR, North Korea and China of the world.

Hi,

You did not understand---.

It was ONE man who came up with the analysis / theory / idea / principals to begin with---the others followed the guideline---.

America is big on pushing and putting one leader upfront---the team takes a back seat---. There is always that one face of the project to lead.

Projects are made to fail---breakthroughs just don't come easy---.
 
.
And Germans behind the space program of both soviets and Americans.
Common misconception. The Germans prior to WW2 admitted that an American physicist Robert Goddard helped their V-2 rocket program. Germany advanced it because of its military application. The U.S. took advantage of it when the war was over and the Cold War was starting.

Although his work in the field was revolutionary, Goddard received little public support, moral or monetary, for his research and development work.[9]:92,93 He was a shy person and rocket research was not considered a suitable pursuit for a physics professor.[10]:12 The press and other scientists ridiculed his theories of spaceflight. As a result, he became protective of his privacy and his work. He also preferred working alone because of the aftereffects of a bout with tuberculosis.[10]:13


Nevertheless, in 1963, von Braun, reflecting on the history of rocketry, said of Goddard: "His rockets ... may have been rather crude by present-day standards, but they blazed the trail and incorporated many features used in our most modern rockets and space vehicles".[84] He once recalled that "Goddard's experiments in liquid fuel saved us years of work, and enabled us to perfect the V-2 years before it would have been possible."[85] After World War II von Braun reviewed Goddard's patents and believed they contained enough technical information to build a large missile.
[86]

Three features developed by Goddard appeared in the V-2: (1) turbopumps were used to inject fuel into the combustion chamber; (2) gyroscopically controlled vanes in the nozzle stabilized the rocket until external vanes in the air could do so; and (3) excess alcohol was fed in around the combustion chamber walls, so that a blanket of evaporating gas protected the engine walls from the combustion heat. [87]

The Germans had been watching Goddard's progress before the war and became convinced that large, liquid fuel rockets were feasible. General Walter Dornberger, head of the V-2 project, used the idea that they were in a race with the U.S. and that Goddard had "disappeared" (to work with the Navy) as a way to persuade Hitler to raise the priority of the V-2.




"But Frank Winter, a historian at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, said that Dr. Goddard's 1919 paper was ''one of the key catalysts behind the international rocket movement during the 1920's and 30's.'' This was when Dr. Wernher von Braun began experiments that led to the German V-2 rockets of World War II and, eventually, to the Saturn 5 rockets that propelled American astronauts to the moon.

Although he held more than 200 patents in rocket technology, Dr. Goddard received little recognition during his lifetime. At the end of World War II, when Dr. von Braun was asked about his work, he replied: ''Don't you know about your own rocket pioneer? Dr. Goddard was ahead of us all.''
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom