What's new

A Muslim Mosque can be demolished, but not a Hindu temple: Modi's close aide Subramanian Swamy

The case should he handled delicately. Perhaps a secured compound in which masjid is relocated next to mandir? Or maybe Islamic research center next to mandir with prayer hall inside the center. This will not show Indians Muslims that they're being alienated and it would create more harmony.

Plus it will serves as an example of how both communities did thee best to avoid unnecessary bloodshed and conflict. Coz at the end of the day we are all humans and these are Indian citizens regardless of faith.

The thing about subramine is, he paints everything from religious prespective paving way for more communal hatred. Which is not conducive for a diverse nation like India in the long run
 
Last edited:
would the religions change their position when new discoveries prove the religious positions as incorrect?

Man made religion ........ well we men love authority and enslaving our own kind .......... impossible to change. And I don't support men made religion.

But what about word from the Creator himself? Why would that need to change when it already knows what humans may have discovered now?
 
God is relevant in this legal matter as the case is about building a temple and/or mosque.

He is not making his own statement that mosque can be demolished but temple cannot be.

The statement is based on what each faith believes about their place of worship.

You can either counter it or modify Quran (or the Islamic position on mosques) to nullify his statement.

Real life law doesn't work like this, this is just policy based on emotions rather than substance.

The discussion of whether or not God exists in that structure is completely irrelevant to legal status.
 
Man made religion ........ well we men love authority and enslaving our own kind .......... impossible to change. And I don't support men made religion.

But what about word from the Creator himself? Why would that need to change when it already knows what humans may have discovered now?

For you, my religion is man made while for me, your religion is man made. At the end of the day, all religions are man made. People follow because they have blind faith in their religion.
 
RSS is the biggest supporter of partition of India while it is was Gandhi who fully opposed it and lost his life in the process.

Are you crazy ?

RSS was against partition and Nathuram Godse Shot Gandhi because he agreed to partition :cheesy:
 
Real life law doesn't work like this, this is just policy based on emotions rather than substance.

The discussion of whether or not God exists in that structure is completely irrelevant to legal status.

Okay if you take the religion totally out, A tyrant called Babar destructed a temple and built a mosque in that place and now the mosque is being destructed and the temple is being restored.
 
Okay if you take the religion totally out, A tyrant called Babar destructed a temple and built a mosque in that place and now the mosque is being destructed and the temple is being restored.

The Republic of India came into existence in 1950, the Mughal Empire (A completely different state and entity) destroyed that temple in 1528.

Between now and that year is almost 490 years, so how is this in any way relevant to India today?

"For most of the pre-Independence era, the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya did not simply exist for the majority of Indians."

From The Hindu
 
Are you stupid ?

RSS was against partition and Nathuram Godse Shot Gandhi because he agreed to partition :cheesy:

No both IML & RSS supported partition. While Congress and Jamaat-e-Islami have opposed partition

RSS just wanted a clean partition where all muslims would cross over to Pakistan while all Hindus would crossover to India but Gandhi stopped Maulana Azad and his followers from migrating to Pakistan while Mawdudi of Jamaat-e-Islami opposed Jinnah's idea of separate Muslim homeland in Pakistan as he felt that Muslims would be a majority in independent and united India and can form an Islamic state of united India ruled under sharia law.
 
Easiest 'Qabza' method, take murti everywhere put in any building you like and make it a temple! Brilliant logic, next time buildings marked for destruction by municipality in India can be saved by putting a murti in them and getting government grant for restoration of "temple"

All Muslims in India should try to have a law passed in the Indian parliament that"putting a murti in a Muslim house or place will be a criminal act and subject to sever punishment.
 
All Muslims in India should try to have a law passed in the Indian parliament that"putting a murti in a Muslim house or place will be a criminal act and subject to sever punishment.

India is by nature anti Muslim. That is how Jinnah see it and requested independence. If Hindus genuinely would live peacefully with Muslims, would Muslims have the need to form its own country. The Indian Muslims need their own country again.
 
Do you know his son-in-law is a Muslim and his daughter Suhasini Haidar is one of the most liberal journalists?

Swamy is not making an emotional statement here. He is making this as the basis of his argument to court in the Ram mandir case that he is fighting.
According to the research made by accomplished historians ,it was Emperor Shah Jahan who demolished Ram's Janam Bhomi and built TAJ MAHAl,with the money looted from poor people of the country.I suggest KAISERI HINDU should demolish TAJ MAHAL ,after admitting the mistake and return the Baberi Mosque land back to Muslims,with compensation to build a new mosque.
 
Our mosque is NOT a temple. We can pray anywhere clean. You can see Muslims praying in an aircraft, train, etc. Emperor Aurangjeb would pray saddled on his horse during battle. But Babri Mosque issue has become political / emotional.
 
India is by nature anti Muslim. That is how Jinnah see it and requested independence. If Hindus genuinely would live peacefully with Muslims, would Muslims have the need to form its own country. The Indian Muslims need their own country again.


Yogi Rapingnath stated himself that Islam and Hinduism cant co-exist. So he endorses the 'Two Nation Theory' as well. Finally it has come from the mouth of Hindus themselves. Therefore, only the following possibilities are a logical outcome of this attitude:
1) Indian Muslims must convert to Hinduism.
2) Indian Muslims must leave India.
3) Indian Muslims must all be wiped out physically.
4) Indian Muslims must carve out a new homeland.

The Partition of India is not yet complete. It was hastily done and there are still 200 million Muslims in India. I wonder if these mad Hindutva lunatics are preparing a 'final solution' for Muslims. Indian Muslims are in a very dangerous position.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom