A Historical Background of Indian Aggression in Nepal

[baajey]

Source of the articles are bloody blogs

when u cant find proof , write a blog !!!!

 

[nForce]

lol.. Nepali citizens dont need Work Permit to work in India. So much for aggression.

Probably @Doyalbaba is hurt because the same thing does not apply to Bangladeshis

 

[samv]

India is a curse to South Asia.

No difference with regards to Sri Lanka.

Scream and shout that they are going to be a super power with a ginormous economy, but yet want to steal the resources of much smaller countries. Thievery seems to be a hallmark.

 

[coffee_cup]

If history has shown anything, the artificial country "India", which borrowed her name from an artificial entity called "British India", created by British has never let her neighbors live in peace.

And to this day this trend is continuing and has been accelerated after the extremist hindu version of Talibans have taken hold of Indian govt.

This is just more bad news for South Asia.

 

[Mr.Nair]

If history has shown anything, the artificial country "India", which borrowed her name from an artificial entity called "British India", created by British has never let her neighbors live in peace.

And to this day this trend is continuing and has been accelerated after the extremist hindu version of Talibans have taken hold of Indian govt.

This is just more bad news for South Asia.

Just like Police(India) is a bad news for Robbers in south asia

 

[samv]

Just like Police(India) is a bad news for Robbers in south asia

Actually Pakistan has helped Sri Lanka a lot. At least they didn't arm, train and fund one of the world's deadliest terrorist groups in SL like India did.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Actually Pakistan has helped Sri Lanka a lot. At least they didn't arm, train and fund one of the world's deadliest terrorist groups in SL like India did.

And this is how you pay back

Sri Lanka cancels on-arrival visa facility for Pakistanis - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

 

[coffee_cup]

Actually Pakistan has helped Sri Lanka a lot. At least they didn't arm, train and fund one of the world's deadliest terrorist groups in SL like India did.

And we'll continue helping friendly countries who are like us victims of Indian cross-border terrorism. Indian support for the deadliest terrorists in other countries must be highlighted to show the world what kind of double games this artificial country is playing.

"India" currently ruled by extremists is a real danger to the regional and world peace.

 

[Mr.Nair]

Actually Pakistan has helped Sri Lanka a lot. At least they didn't arm, train and fund one of the world's deadliest terrorist groups in SL like India did.

India did? ohh u just forgot the sacrifice done by one of our Pvs PM and it is our fault sending peace keeping force in SL.Many innocent tamilians loosing life and you considered them as a second class citizen in your country.The final days of war video avalilable on youtube which is worse even to describe(I know it's a war).So don't tell us SL are angels.

 

[24 Hours]

Bangladeshi post from blogpost, i post from blogpost.

That was not the point.

Regardless there are some points which should be considered like the economic blockade of 1989.

If history has shown anything, the artificial country "India", which borrowed her name from an artificial entity called "British India", created by British has never let her neighbors live in peace.

What does this even mean? Of course it's an artificial country, all countries are artificial.

 

[coffee_cup]

....
What does this even mean? Of course it's an artificial country, all countries are artificial.

Indians keep saying that Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc. are part of "India".

To what I say, what is "India"? An artificial country, which was created by forcefully joining several dozen independent states into one "British India" by British.

After the British divided this entity, there was no more "British India" left, but several independent countries came into being. Pakistan, Baharat (which borrowed the name "India" from "British India") etc.

So by which right, modern day Indians have wet dreams to claim that Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal etc. are part of their artificial country?

 

[DrasticMeasure]

It's time we convince/force Nepal to join Indian union. They always belonged to India, time to just make it happen.

 

[24 Hours]

Indians keep saying that Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc. are part of "India".

To what I say, what is "India"? An artificial country, which was created by forcefully joining several dozen independent states into one "British India" by British.

After the British divided this entity, there was no more "British India" left, but several independent countries came into being. Pakistan, Baharat (which borrowed the name "India" from "British India") etc.

So by which right, modern day Indians have wet dreams to claim that Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal etc. are part of their artificial country?

I suppose the term you should be using then is imaginary rather than artificial. Anyway, the term India was just a term for the Indian Subcontinent, the Republic of India just decided to take it's name from there. If they decided to take a different name instead of India, then I suppose the term India can still be used instead of the Indian subcontinent or South Asia. Why some Indians still use the other outdated definition is beyond me.

 

[Kaniska]

India and aggression to Nepal..Dear poster..Nepal is like our brother to us

 

[nForce]

If history has shown anything, the artificial country "India", which borrowed her name from an artificial entity called "British India", created by British has never let her neighbors live in peace.

And to this day this trend is continuing and has been accelerated after the extremist hindu version of Talibans have taken hold of Indian govt.

This is just more bad news for South Asia.

You have absolutely no idea about history do you ?
For example, why do you think the native Americans are called Indians ?