What's new

A 'European Army' That No European Will Join

Desert Fox

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
10,584
Reaction score
30
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
So recently the leaders of France and Germany are threatening to form a "European Army" to confront Russia, America & China whom they have described as threats to European "sovereignty" (LOL), in response to Trump's suggestions that Nato's European member countries contribute their fair share of the alliances' defense budget rather than piggy-back on Uncle Sam.

There is a whole back-and-forth to this developing situation, and that's not the focus of this thread.

The focus of this thread is a series of questions which European leaders who, out of their hallucinations, particularly the ones threatening to ditch Uncle Sam and form their own "European Army" against the "threat" posed by Russia, China and (lo and behold) their current ally and benefactor America, seem to have looked over.


1) Who will fight in this army? Not Europeans

Your immediate response will be 'well, Europeans, duhh?!?!" Because who else, right?

Well more than half of Europeans, which is an overwhelming majority, don't want to fight for their countries

o-PERCENTAGE-OF-PEOPLE-WILLING-TO-FIGHT-FOR-COUNTRY-570[1].jpg

Source: Western Europeans Unwilling To Fight
For Their Country



But why is that? For one, the governments of these countries in no way share the sentiments of their people. In fact, these governments have actively worked towards the destruction of their constituency by forcing policies of social engineering on them that undermine the social fabric of these societies, and then works to suppress any opposing opinions. This naturally creates resentment.

Why would one sacrifice their creature comforts for a country who's government no longer represents the ideals for which his forefathers once fought and died and actually seeks to eradicate his people?

So to solve this problem, European leaders have come up with an amazing solution; import millions of illiterate Africans and other foreign men in the guise of "refugees", entice them with free iPhones and prostitutes and old Feminist hags. But will this solution work? Because clearly millions of men from predominantly Muslim regions of the world will fight and die for feminists, faggots and other forms of hedonism, right?

download (1).png

Source
When the 'old Europeans' malfunction, you simply get new ones. Who would've
thought it was that easy! But will they fight & die for the Globo-Homo agenda?
Remains to be seen



2) Who will fund this Army?

Nato is a massive military alliance. As of currently Uncle Sam has been picking up a significant portion of the tab for its allies, besides maintaining its own massive military presence and the sophisticated hardware, some of which even EU countries do not produce.

If European countries withdraw from Nato to form their own alliance for sure they will need to fill-in the void left by the Americans in terms of increase in man-power (training and deployment costs) as well as hardware and the R&D involved in. But are they willing to contribute an increased percentage of their GDP towards this end?

To answer that question lets see how Angela Merkel's Germany, which is currently the economic powerhouse of the EU (or so they say), is doing in terms of funding the Bundeswehr:

HJ1QwltaQ[1].png

Source
Are those broomsticks supposed to fly? If this is despite
American funding, imagine what it will be like when the Yanks
pull the plug? LOL



As of now i'm calling these people's bluff. These European leaders do not possess the cajones to walk their talk, unless it comes to punishing their own population of course.

@Nilgiri @Hamartia Antidote @F-22Raptor @LeGenD @Psychic
 
Last edited:
. .
well? here's a solution genius europeans...
STOP PICKING FIGHTS WITH PEOPLE!!!
you are a union of over 500 million educated people and an economy to match, good enough you dimwits leave well enough alone! Just take an approach with the big 3 (China, Russia and America) that "we don't mess with you and you don't mess with us). It is LITERALLY as simple as that!
 
Last edited:
. . .
o-percentage-of-people-willing-to-fight-for-country-570-1-jpg.519138


Why so few Japanese are willing to fight for Japan?
Good question. What is the common denominator in all of the countries who's populations willing to fight are below 50%? Liberalism.

While the nationalistic and anti-Liberal countries have above 50% population willing to fight and die for their homeland.
 
.
Good question. What is the common denominator in all of the countries who's populations willing to fight are below 50%? Liberalism.

While the nationalistic and anti-Liberal countries have above 50% population willing to fight and die for their homeland.

so liberalism is responsible .
 
.
So we need basically more liberalism in the world so there will be fewer soldiers and thus fewer wars. I like the sound of that.
 
. .
BS thread Europe have more than enough soldiers to fight with them
 
.
I think they're doing it for fear of the Turkish folks (it's embedded into their psyche)!!! And, who won't?????

We are born at our homes, and we die at the battlefields - a Turkish saying

There is another one that my turkish friend told me, we are born alone but we die together as brothers in war.
 
.
The problem of Europe is not a lack of volunteers. 20% of 500 million is still 125 million. More than enough. The problem is that the vast majority of modern European elite is grown by Americans to serve the American interests. That is, the Europeans will have to fight not only with the American external influence, but with the comprador elites.
The occupation of Europe is lasting for 73 years. Several generations of Europeans grew up under American occupation.
 
.
The problem of Europe is not a lack of volunteers. 20% of 500 million is still 125 million. More than enough. The problem is that the vast majority of modern European elite is grown by Americans to serve the American interests. That is, the Europeans will have to fight not only with the American external influence, but with the comprador elites.
The occupation of Europe is lasting for 73 years. Several generations of Europeans grew up under American occupation.

That is exactly the crux of the problem. I also highlight this point in every thread. The Europeans are hijacked by the USA. The Americans have hijacked Europe ever since the World War "liberation". The Europeans cannot maneuver.
 
.
Polls are polls,but it depends on your definition of "fight for your country". Nowadays,"fighting for your country" means fighting in overseas shitholes for dubious interests or reasons,legitimate or not. Why would you join the army to fight (and die) for other countrie's interests ?

Actually,an "European army" would represent a credible force if all europeans pool their ressources together. I agree we must spend more on defence,but to build our own autonomy and independence,there's no peace dividend anymore with such a volatile world. Actually a big number of European countries are increasing their defence budgets...



I had the same reaction to this post,lol.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom