What's new

A Commando's Instinct

OK, Lets take a break!

:flirt::girl_wink::dirol: OT on.


Posting under the influence is trolling? Apart from the fact that some are brighter drunk than others sober,
I wonder if we should not include regular drugs from the doctor too ... in which case PDF will take a drop,
a very serious drop in membership if we ban then!!! Especially if we screen by post content!!! :whistle:



Same as above, if we don't quote warmongers, there will only 20 books and poetry left, and not all of the latter.
Oh! ... and then act innocent. Sorry, just saw that, nevermind! :partay:



Darn right! That's the spirit! Full bragging rights or bust! We'll do your gear Pakist.yle! :pakistan:



Some might be both ( Not Guynextdoor2 though, he's too haphazard! ). :azn:



Puke on India, you meant? I trust Pakistan already does that! But nuke? Nah, don't be a pessimist, mate!
OT off. :ph34r:

GN gang, Tay.
Early weekend Tay?
 
. .
What finger?



You wore a uniform with pride once, respect it. Secondly, you have a title on this forum, you could always hand it in and then resort to mud slinging. Your call Sir!

LOL. Welcome to the club. The proposition has been made before, only a few days before, in pressing terms, by Indian members from the Hindutva camp who consider my presence on the forum quite superfluous.

Apparently I am now an equal-opportunity nuisance.

Perhaps the better course of action would be to hand it in and abstain.
 
.
LOL. Welcome to the club. The proposition has been made before, only a few days before, in pressing terms, by Indian members from the Hindutva camp who consider my presence on the forum quite superfluous.

Apparently I am now an equal-opportunity nuisance.

Perhaps the better course of action would be to hand it in and abstain.
Or rather, keep doing what you are doing as a constant reminder to what a professional sounds like... the caliber of title holders is not a constant as any other aspect...This thread, a prime example.

Here we have a thread created by posting an article with absolutely zero contribution by the member, zero original content - and we have a "Professional" @Khafee rating it positive with complete dis-regard for the forum rules on ratings, and then another copy paste Off topic post on war trophy's done the same instead of being reported as an off topic post. After that having the audacity to take shots t you...

@WebMaster remind the member the criterion for positive ratings before taking potshots at the veterans of this forum.
 
Last edited:
.
Or rather, keep doing what you are doing as a constant reminder to what a professional sounds like... the caliber of title holders is not a constant as any other aspect...This thread, a prime example.

Here we have a thread created by posting an article with absolutely zero contribution by the member, zero original content - and we have a "Professional" @Khafee rating it positive with complete dis-regard for the forum rules on ratings, and then another copy paste Off topic post on war trophy's done the same instead of being reported as an off topic post. After that having the audacity to take shots t you...

@WebMaster remind the member the criterion for positive ratings before taking potshots at the veterans of this forum.


It's all right, really.

His advice was well-meaning and I read it as such. What he himself did elsewhere, as your post says, was not known to me; would I have reacted if it was known? Perhaps, perhaps not. Who knows?

As for myself, I hope I never get to the point where I believe I can do no wrong, or cannot be corrected.
 
.
Well Col (retd) Ashfaq Hussain named his book "Witness to Blunder" but instead of looking how and where things went wrong lets discuss commando's instinct.

I didn't see any text from the book published in the news item, however, a Pakistani Helicopter intruding 11 Km, landing and taking off, then repeating the same exercise the next day, that too on a sensitive border without even a twitch from Indian side certainly needs introspection and perhaps Indian members should keep this in mind next time they rejoice over the alleged OBL raid. !!!
 
.
And as for M. M. Alam, you should make discreet enquiries what his peers and genuine war heroes in the PAF thought of his claims. You can even find those who have been everything short of gone into print on this.
nobody disputed his numbers or for the fact that he downed 5 enemy aircrafts in 60sec and first 3 being in 30 sec.
They just say that it was a duck shoot for him, not a superior tactical display which overwhelmed them enemy like others.
Which i think is a valid point.
It hasnt got anything to do with what yr trying to imply.
 
Last edited:
.
nobody disputed his numbers or for the fact that he downed 5 enemy aircrafts in 60sec and first 3 being in 30 sec.
They just say that it was a duck shoot for him, not a superior tactical display which overwhelmed them enemy like others.
Which i think is a valid point.
It hasnt got anything to do with what yr trying to imply.

I suggest you dig around a little. And among his peers. I wouldn't like to be thought to be pulling down one of your heroes, which is why I am quite.

What I am talking about is in print, in a blog, if I remember correctly.
 
.
I suggest you dig around a little. And among his peers. I wouldn't like to be thought to be pulling down one of your heroes, which is why I am quite.

What I am talking about is in print, in a blog, if I remember correctly.
u mean Kaisar Taufail?
Yes thats also pretty correct but he said same thing. Basically there r accounts of many people abt the events. But the most common thing amongst them is what i have mentioned.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom