A Brief History of The Warrior Rajputs

[Charon 2]

Nothing wrong with that Pashtun has become a distinct culture on its own. Although looking Mongoloid is not the only criteria for being Turkic lol most of you Turks in Turkey look Caucasian not Mongoloid.

I know that looking Mongoloid is not a criteria for being Turkic as most Turkic peoples are actually Caucasoid (Turks and Azeris are the most numerous Turkic group and we are predominantly Caucasoid). Turkic peoples like Cumans were even described with blonde hair and blue eyes by most historians and modern Turkic peoples like Tatars and Chuvashs look even predominantly European

Is there a difference between the Ghilzai and Durrani language? Do the Ghilzais have many Turkic loanwords in their language or isn't there any difference between the Durrani and Ghilzai dialects? if that's the case then I can understand it when some Ghilzais feel connected with Turkic peoples. if that's not the case and the language of Durranis and Ghilzais has no difference at all then I will find it strange and ridiculous if some Ghilzais connect themselves with Turkic peoples

Oh and the Barlas were not pure Mongols but rather mixed Turko-Mongols who got completely Turkicized . The same case with Ghilzais

 

[A Town]

@KingMamba
Cheers for the info bro, and for summarising that section of the book.

 

[INDIC]

Been through this.

Bahut hi achchi baat hai.

 

[Srinivas]

Bahut hi achchi baat hai.

Vedic civilization originated on the banks of Saraswathi river based on Rig Veda . This river flowed through interior India from Himalayas upto Gujarat as per the new evidences found.

The Vedic people moved from India towards west i.e to Iran and east towards Gangetic plains and to the South.

India is the birth place of Vedic civilization and Sanskrit.

Vedic do not mean they are Brahmins , Brahmins came later.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Vedic civilization originated on the banks of Saraswathi river based on Rig Veda . This river flowed through interior India from Himalayas upto Gujarat as per the new evidences found.

The Vedic people moved from India towards west i.e to Iran and east towards Gangetic plains and to the South.

India is the birth place of Vedic civilization and Sanskrit.

Vedic do not mean they are Brahmins , Brahmins came later.

Hahah another OIT believer hindutva. Cut the crap, no one believes in hindutva fabricated history. Also Saraswati river may not even exist.

 

[Srinivas]

Hahah another OIT believer hindutva. Cut the crap, no one believes in hindutva fabricated history. Also Saraswati river may not even exist.

Come up with proofs what I have said is wrong, or else what ever you said is not a valid statement at all.

 

[INDIC]

Vedic civilization originated on the banks of Saraswathi river based on Rig Veda . This river flowed through interior India from Himalayas upto Gujarat as per the new evidences found.

The Vedic people moved from India towards west i.e to Iran and east towards Gangetic plains and to the South.

India is the birth place of Vedic civilization and Sanskrit.

Vedic do not mean they are Brahmins , Brahmins came later.

Actually, Hinduism and Zoroastrianism developed in parallel having a common origin and thus Rigveda and Avesta shares a lots of similarities.

 

[Srinivas]

Actually, Hinduism and Zoroastrianism developed in parallel having a common origin and thus Rigveda and Avesta shares a lots of similarities.

They are not parallel both are of different time lines , Rig Veda is very old based on some assertions.

OIT (Out of India) Theory seems stronger when the same logic of AIT is applied.

In this video the author presents his proofs.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Come up with proofs what I have said is wrong, or else what ever you said is not a valid statement at all.

What you said is full of crap and no neutral historian believe in saraswati crap either. Infact Ghaggar-Hakra river does not match discription of Saraswati in Rig Veda. So first provide proof of your bs claims for once.

 

[INDIC]

They are not parallel both are of different time lines , Rig Veda is very old based on some assertions.

OIT (Out of India) Theory seems stronger when the same logic of AIT is applied.

In this video the author presents his proofs.

Avesta mentions Hapta Hindu(Sapta Sindhu) as one of the part of Airyanem Vaejah. Earliest Iranian civilization centered around Eastern Iran having continuity with earliest Indian civilization centred around Sapta Sindhu. BTW I will watch it.

 

[Srinivas]

What you said is full of crap and no neutral historian believe in saraswati crap either. Infact Ghaggar-Hakra river does not match discription of Saraswati in Rig Veda. So first provide proof of your bs claims for once.

http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/oct25/articles20.htm

Experts to trace roots of Saraswati River - The Times of India

Saraswati The Lost River

Amazing facts about - Ancient India: Mystery of Sarsavati River

The Myth of Aryan Invasion of India

Even in Mahabharata this Mighty River was mentioned flowing through Gujarat.

 

[Srinivas]

@INDIC Bro I am just clarifying my statement .... ,

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Saraswati – the ancient river lost in the desert

Experts to trace roots of Saraswati River - The Times of India

Saraswati The Lost River

Amazing facts about - Ancient India: Mystery of Sarsavati River

The Myth of Aryan Invasion of India

Even in Mahabharata this Mighty River was mentioned flowing through Gujarat.

This Pakistani river Ghaggar-Hakra is monsoon fed, while Rig Vedic Saraswati river was himalaya fed. Even then in Rig Veda the most important and mightiest river is Indus by far while mythical Saraswati is 2nd most important. 2012 study by reputable international PNAS proved.

''Also recent definitive study by Giosan et al in PNAS (Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization; 2012; June 26; 109 (26): e1688-94) which clearly demonstrated that the the much touted Ghaggar-Hakra was a monsoon-fed river, not the Vedic Sarasvati fed by the melting snows of high mountains.''

You can search more on this and see the complete report.

 

[Armstrong]

Baal ki khaal .. aur ajeeb question kRNAY WALAY SHAKS..

Baraa hiii kameena haiii tuu !

Achaaa mereiii bhai how is life treating you these days ?

 

[INDIC]

This Pakistani river Ghaggar-Hakra is monsoon fed, while Rig Vedic Saraswati river was himalaya fed. Even then in Rig Veda the most important and mightiest river is Indus by far while mythical Saraswati is 2nd most important. 2012 study by reputable international PNAS proved.

''Also recent definitive study by Giosan et al in PNAS (Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization; 2012; June 26; 109 (26): e1688-94) which clearly demonstrated that the the much touted Ghaggar-Hakra was a monsoon-fed river, not the Vedic Sarasvati fed by the melting snows of high mountains.''

You can search more on this and see the complete report.

Ghaggar-Hakra was monsoon fed and thus most suitable for winter cultivation and unlike Indus there was no risk of rise in water level when snow melts during standing crops. That was the reason that most of the Indus valley sites on Ghaggar-Hakra instead of Indus. BTW Ghaggar-Hakra did originate from the Himalayas from Shivalik ranges even if it was a monsoon fed river and many prominent historians still believe it is the Saraswati of Rigveda as it matches with the description of being in between Sutlej and Yamuna.