70 years after defeating Japan, India forgets Imphal

[Koovie]

Ina was nothing just ask the British forces who fought them the still considered them hardest opponents
Britain says its greatest battle was fought in Imphal and Kohima - NDTV

AS the article says, 1500 British Indians surrounded by 15,000 Japanese and a handful of INA soldiers... yet they held out till reinforcements arrived.

I
well it hard Choose Btw two wrongs INA was For Cause of Indian independence I Still considered Japs are better from those White Swines Britishers

Japan was already dead by the time of the battle of Imphal.... lets say they had managed to it into India and driven out the Brits (which is nonsense).... then what?

India would have fallen into chaos, those regions without anarchy would have been harvested for the Japanese war effort and would have been bombed back into the stone age together with their new friends.

Impossible to Predict if People saw Ina winning You might see Evolving INA.

Yup, the INA would have seen a rise in members... but it still would have been dependent on the Axis.

 

[NKVD]

AS the article says, 1500 British Indians surrounded by 15,000 Japanese and a handful of INA soldiers... yet they held out till reinforcements arrived.

Its One part of Many stories Britishers still think War in Impal and Kohima was Most hardest battle they ever fought Defeating Bettle of waterloo it was in News 1 year back or So

 

[Koovie]

Its One part of Many stories Britishers still think War in Impal and Kohima was Most hardest battle they ever fought Defeating Bettle of waterloo it was in News 1 year back or So

Yeah but you do realize that the British Indian Army fought a thousands of Japanese and only a handful of INA soldiers?

 

[illuminatidinesh]

What a stupid article, TOI crap.