What's new

64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Report
64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup
New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate spy.
gettyimages-160316677.jpg


Declassified documents released last week shed light on the Central Intelligence Agency’s central role in the 1953 coup that brought down Iranian Prime Minister Muhammad Mossadegh, fueling a surge of nationalism which culminated in the 1979 Iranian Revolution and poisoning U.S.-Iran relations into the 21st century.

The approximately 1,000 pages of documents also reveal for the first time the details of how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate spy on the ground.

Known as Operation Ajax, the CIA plot was ultimately about oil. Western firms had for decades controlled the region’s oil wealth, whether Arabian-American Oil Company in Saudi Arabia, or the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in Iran. When the U.S. firm in Saudi Arabia bowed to pressure in late 1950 and agreed to share oil revenues evenly with Riyadh, the British concession in Iran came under intense pressure to follow suit. But London adamantly refused.

So in early 1951, amid great popular acclaim, Mossadegh nationalized Iran’s oil industry. A fuming United Kingdom began conspiring with U.S. intelligence services to overthrow Mossadegh and restore the monarchy under the shah. (Though some in the U.S. State Department, the newly released cables show, blamed British intransigence for the tensions and sought to work with Mossadegh.)

The coup attempt began on August 15 but was swiftly thwarted. Mossadegh made dozens of arrests. Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi, a top conspirator, went into hiding, and the shah fled the country.

The CIA, believing the coup to have failed, called it off.

“Operation has been tried and failed and we should not participate in any operation against Mossadegh which could be traced back to US,” CIA headquarters wrote to its station chief in Iran in a newly declassified cable sent on Aug. 18, 1953.

“Operations against Mossadegh should be discontinued.”“Operations against Mossadegh should be discontinued.”
That is the cable which Kermit Roosevelt, top CIA officer in Iran, purportedly and famously ignored, according to Malcolm Byrne, who directs the U.S.-Iran Relations Project at the National Security Archive at George Washington University.

“One guy was in the room with Kermit Roosevelt when he got this cable,” Byrne told Foreign Policy. “[Roosevelt] said no — we’re not done here.” It was already known that Roosevelt had not carried out an order from Langley to cease and desist. But the cable itself and its contents were not previously known.

The consequences of his decision were momentous. The next day, on August 19, 1953, with the aid of “rented” crowds widely believed to have been arranged with CIA assistance, the coup succeeded. Iran’s nationalist hero was jailed, the monarchy restored under the Western-friendly shah, and Anglo-Iranian oil — renamed British Petroleum — tried to get its fields back. (But didn’t really: Despite the coup, nationalist pushback against a return to foreign control of oil was too much, leaving BP and other majors to share Iran’s oil wealth with Tehran.)

Operation Ajax has long been a bogeyman for conservatives in Iran — but also for liberals. The coup fanned the flames of anti-Western sentiment, which reached a crescendo in 1979 with the U.S. hostage crisis, the final overthrow of the shah, and the creation of the Islamic Republic to counter the “Great Satan.”

The coup alienated liberals in Iran as well. Mossadegh is widely considered to be the closest thing Iran has ever had to a democratic leader. He openly championed democratic values and hoped to establish a democracy in Iran. The elected parliament selected him as prime minister, a position he used to reduce the power of the shah, thus bringing Iran closer in line with the political traditions that had developed in Europe. But any further democratic development was stymied on Aug. 19.


The U.S government long denied involvement in the coup.The U.S government long denied involvement in the coup. The State Department first released coup-related documents in 1989, but edited out any reference to CIA involvement. Public outrage coaxed a government promise to release a more complete edition, and some material came out in 2013. Two years later, the full installment of declassified material was scheduled — but might have interfered with Iran nuclear talks and were delayed again, Byrne said. They were finally released last week, though numerous original CIA telegrams from that period are known to have disappeared or been destroyed long ago.
Byrne said that the long delay is due to several factors. Intelligence services are always concerned about protecting “sources and methods,” said Byrne, meaning the secret spycraft that enables them to operate on the ground. The CIA also needed to protect its relationship with British intelligence, which may have wished some of the material remain safeguarded.

Beyond final proof of CIA involvement, there’s another very interesting takeaway in the documents, said Abbas Milani, a professor of Iranian studies at Stanford University: New details on the true political leanings of Ayatollah Abol-Ghasem Kashani, a cleric and leading political figure in the 1950s.

In the Islamic Republic, clerics are always the good guys. Kashani has long been seen as one of the heroes of nationalism during that period. As recently as January of this year, Iran’s supreme leader praised Kashani’s role in the nationalization of oil.

Kashani’s eventual split from Mossadegh is widely known. Religious leaders in the country feared the growing power of the communist Tudeh Party, and believed that Mossadegh was too weak to save the country from the socialist threat.

But the newly released documents show that Kashani wasn’t just opposed to Mossadegh — he was also in close communication with the Americans throughout the period leading up to the coup, and he actually appears to have requested financial assistance from the United States, though there is no record of him receiving any money. His request was not previously known.

On the make-or-break day of Aug. 19, “Kashani was critical,” said Milani. “On that day Kashani’s forces were out in full force to defeat Mossadegh.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/20...ases-details-of-iranian-coup-iran-tehran-oil/
 
.
.
As said earlier, ayatollah kashani was a traitor, british-american spy and was against nationalism and mossadeq. Now islamic republic boys who did a smear campaign against mossadeq will start to deny the facts again.

Lanat bar mihanfooroosh.
 
Last edited:
.
How Iranian PDF member see this coup and its repercussion. While ago listen a radio program about moving the same coup for regime change in Iran . Commentator responded , at that time total cost of that coup was less then a million dollar and now , Iran top religious authority has estimated over 100 billion dollars in there account .
Your take please . ... fact or fabrication ?
 
.
our journey towards democracy has been more like a stumble and stagger than an orderly walk...looks like we still have a few more stumbles before we achieve a true democracy. So sad we're such a unique and industrious population in a messed up neighborhood. We can do so much with some good governance.
 
. .
Hypocrites believe whatever their beloved U.S/U.K say, the same U.S/U.K who ran the coup yesterday and say the regime change is their current policy, and yet dare to talk about patriotism!

Kashani's warning letter to Mosaddeq about the coming coup, Mosaddeq's response below the letter.


beloved U.S just remembered that Ayatullah Kashani was cooperating with them!

on the following clip we can see how U.S/U.K try to stick some archival videos to eachother to fabricate the presence of Ayatullah Kashani in the Mosaddeq's house after the coup:

پاسخی به جنجال اخیر بر علیه آیت الله کاشانی
 
.
Coup was indeed a major turning point in west-Iran relations. It simply put the democratic process on the back-burner for a long time. The coup not only derailed the democratic process but later gave handle to religious conservatives to shape important policies of the country.
 
.
Yes Yes.... Ahmadinejad was great for Iran and has no Jewish roots.

Mosavi was a Carzy CIA agent and it is not true that he had his elections inspection team closed down a few days before the election, and it is not true that they announced Ahmadinejad had won the elections even before the poles were closed.

Kashani was not loved by the Shah and did not help him..... the above picture is not the Shah kissing kashani... it is all the work of the CIA..... There are no Akhonds that have ever worked and helped the west... they too good and god fearing!

Some people.....
 
.
Yes, Ahmadinejad has no Jewish roots, the rest of your lies are the same.
But thanks for showing the level of your intelligence.
 
Last edited:
.
Well I don't knew if this data are true or if via faked them in political world I won't put any thing above the politicians and these agencies like CIA and MI? And KGB and Mossad are just tools at the hand of politicians .

But let be honest accusation against Ayat-Allah Kashani is not new as just less than 3 week after the coupe he announced his happiness about the coupe .
Its stated that in an interview with Akhbar-Alyom newspaper when they asked him what was biggest mistake of Mossaddeq he answered acting against constitution and disobeying kings order .
He also stated trying to make a republic in Iran as other mistake of Mossaddeq and after that he said that people like the king.
And after that he said what happened to Mossaddeq was the result of God justice.
Also after the coupe he he stated his happiness about the coupe government and said that this government work for people and return greatness to people.
And went to the extent to claim because Mossaddeq acted against the ruler of the country he is acted against the religion.

And well I'm told these are the source of above claims

کیهان، ۱۲ آبان ۱۳۳۲
کیهان، ۱۷ شهریور ۱۳۳۲
روزنامه آتش، ۳۱ مرداد ۱۳۳۲
کیهان، ۲۳ شهریور ۱۳۳۲
مجموعه‌ای از مکتوبات وسخنرانی‌های آیت‌الله کاشانی، ج۳، ص ۱۱۲


By the way as I already said nothing is above politician and these claims can be just politically motivated slander.
 
Last edited:
.
That traitor kashani sold out Dr. Mosaddegh to british and american intelligence agencies just because he didn't accept to turn Iran to an "Islamic State". To me, there's no difference between that bastard traitor and abu bakr al-baghdadi, Down with kashani, burn in hell you traitor.
 
.

پایان شایعه درباره نقش آیت الله کاشانی در کودتا ۲۸ مرداد + عکس

6393254_695.jpg


خبرنگار بی‌بی‌سی که یکی از مطالب او منشا تصورات مبنی بر همراهی آیت‌الله کاشانی با کودتای ۲۸ مرداد شده، اعلام کرد که چنین چیزی نگفته است.

وقتی خبرنگار بی بی سی حرف خود را انکار کرد!
چند روز پیش و در پی انتشار چند توئیت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی، جوّی علیه آیت‌الله کاشانی شکل گرفت؛ مبنی بر اینکه ایشان در کودتای 28 مرداد 1332 علیه دکتر مصدق نقش‌آفرینی و با کودتاگران همراهی کرده است! این مطالب پس از انتشار اسناد جدید سازمان CIA و بویژه بعد از آن مطرح شد که عبدالله رمضان‌زاده سخنگوی دولت دوم خرداد در صفحه خود رسماً آقای کاشانی را به همراهی با کودتا متهم کرد و بلافاصله نتیجه‌گیری هم کرد که باید نام خیابان آیت‌الله کاشانی هم عوض شود: "حال که اسناد همراهی کاشانی با کودتای آمریکایی افشا شده، نام خیابان "آیت‌الله کاشانی" را تغییر دهید!"

6393255_687.jpg


با توجه به قرائن موجود در شبکه اجتماعی توئیتر، اشاره عبدالله رمضان‌زاده درباره اسناد، مطالبی است که بهمن کلباسی خبرنگار بی‌بی‌سی در صفحه خود منتشر کرد.کلباسی با اشاره به اسناد منتشره توسط سیا نوشته بود "مدرک زیاده، ساعتها کار میبره. مثلا یکیش نشون میده که سى آى اى معتقد بوده که شاه اگر فرار نکرده بود کودتا علیه مصدق همان دفعه اول موفق میشد." و در پست دیگری که منشأ تصور همراهی آیت‌الله کاشانی با کودتا شد نوشت: "چند تا دیگه{سند} هم هست که نشان از حمایت جدى کاشانى و بخش از بزرگى از روحانیت از شاه و مخالفتشان با دکتر مصدق دارد."

6393257_623.jpg




در واقع رمضان‌زاده با درنظر گرفتن همین پست خبرنگار بی‌بی‌سی ادعای همراهی آیت‌الله کاشانی با کودتای آمریکایی را مطرح کرد که پس از آن به صورت گسترده در شبکه‌های اجتماعی منتشر شد.

در پی این ماجرا، بنده به همراه چند نفر از خبرنگاران خبرگزاری تسنیم، تعداد قابل توجهی از اسناد منتشر شده را بررسی کردیم. هرچند بررسی تمام این اسناد در این زمان کوتاه امکان پذیر نبود، اما همه آن اسنادی که در طی همین مدت بررسی شد، به همراه اسناد دیگری که در تاریخ ثبت شده همگی نشان می‌داد که علیرغم اختلاف نظر آیت‌الله کاشانی با آقای دکتر مصدق، اولاً همواره آمریکایی‌ها مصدق را به کاشانی ترجیح داده‌اند و ثانیاً: آقای کاشانی نه تنها موافق کودتا نبوده بلکه دکتر مصدق را نسبت به وقوع کودتای آمریکایی هشدار هم داده اما با بی‌اعتنایی آقای مصدق روبرو شده است. بر این اساس مطلبی در کانال تلگرامی نوشته و به اسنادی در آن اشاره کردم که سیا در آن تصریح کرده بود: "در صورتی که کاشانی به قدرت برسد، نتیجه احتمالی در ایران وضعی به مراتب بدتر برای منافع غرب نسبت به وضع فعلی خواهد بود. رسیدن به توافق با حکومت (کاشانی) برای حل مناقشه نفتی نسبت به دولت فعلی دشوارتر خواهد بود و آن دولت، در برابر نفوذ غرب مقاوم‌تر عمل خواهد کرد."

CIA document stating that they prefer Mosaddeq over the Kashani:
6393258_710.jpg



سند سیا: در صورتی که کاشانی به قدرت برسد، نتیجه احتمالی در ایران وضعی به مراتب بدتر برای منافع غرب نسبت به وضع فعلی خواهد بود
پیرو انتشار این مطلب، بهمن کلباسی در توئیتر خود، رسماً هرگونه ادعا از جانب خود مبنی بر نقش آیت‌الله کاشانی در کودتا را تکذیب کرده و نوشته است: "سردبیر تسنیم! من کی و کجا درباره نقش کاشانی حرف زدم؟" او سپس به توئیتهایی که در این باره منتشر کرده ارجاع داده و نوشته است که تنها توئیتی که منتشر کرده همان است که در ابتدای این متن نیز درج شد. به عبارت دیگر مقصود کلباسی آن است که منظور او از انتشار آن جمله، ادعای نقش آقای کاشانی در کودتا نبوده است.

6393256_265.jpg




هرچند برای بی‌بی‌سی و سیا که تا کودتا علیه یک کشور را برای خود مجاز می‌دانند، ساختن سند علیه فرد و افراد چندان کار عجیب و غریبی نیست و از این پس هم اگر علیه شخصیتهای تاریخی سند جعل کنند، تعجب‌آور نخواهد بود، اما از پاسخ اخیر بهمن کلباسی مبنی بر اینکه "از نقش آقای کاشانی در کودتا سخن نگفته"، باید استقبال و آن را به معنای پایانی بر شایعات و افترائات این روزها علیه آقای کاشانی قلمداد کرد.

اما تاسف بالاتر برای امثال رمضان‌زاده‌ باقی می‌ماند که از هول حلیم در دیگ افتاده‌اند و با این تصور که خبرنگار بی‌بی‌سی سند مشارکت کاشانی در کودتا را منتشر کرده، هشتگ هم ساختند و به صورت گسترده درباره آن نوشتند. کار به جایی رسید که با همین تخیلات و تصورات، اسم خیابانها را هم پی در پی عوض می‌کردند و به نظر این کار تا اسم کوچه‌ خودشان هم داشت پیش می‌رفت که به افتخار این کشف بزرگ، کوچه را هم به نام خودشان بزنند تا در تاریخ ماندگار شوند!

به نظر می‌رسد کار از اعتماد به بیگانه هم گذشته، برخی داخلی‌ها مثل رمضان‌زاده اگر آب مهیّا ببینند، از امثال بی‌بی‌سی و هرچه بیگانه هست، شناگرترند.


Well I don't knew if this data are true or if via faked them in political world I won't put any thing above the politicians and these agencies like CIA and MI? And KGB and Mossad are just tools at the hand of politicians .

But let be honest accusation against Ayat-Allah Kashani is not new as just less than 3 week after the coupe he announced his happiness about the coupe .
Its stated that in an interview with Akhbar-Alyom newspaper when they asked him what was biggest mistake of Mossaddeq he answered acting against constitution and disobeying kings order .
He also stated trying to make a republic in Iran as other mistake of Mossaddeq and after that he said that people like the king.
And after that he said what happened to Mossaddeq was the result of God justice.
Also after the coupe he he stated his happiness about the coupe government and said that this government work for people and return greatness to people.
And went to the extent to claim because Mossaddeq acted against the ruler of the country he is acted against the religion.

And well I'm told these are the source of above claims

کیهان، ۱۲ آبان ۱۳۳۲
کیهان، ۱۷ شهریور ۱۳۳۲
روزنامه آتش، ۳۱ مرداد ۱۳۳۲
کیهان، ۲۳ شهریور ۱۳۳۲
مجموعه‌ای از مکتوبات وسخنرانی‌های آیت‌الله کاشانی، ج۳، ص ۱۱۲


By the way as I already said nothing is above politician and these claims can be just politically motivated slander.
hostility between Mosaddeq and Kashani wasn't secret. but there are several points:

1.As the Kashani's son stated, Mosaddeq disbanded the Parliament and in the absence of Parliament, Shah had the authority to remove the prime minister, and for this reason, his removal was a legitimate progress initiated by the stupidity of Mosaddeq himself who was persuading parliament members to resign.


2.even if we ignore Kashani's letter to Mosaddeq about the upcoming coup, the fact is that for the half of coup day during which people were chanting in favor of Mosaddeq and against the Kashani , Mosaddeq did nothing. this strengthen the theory that Mosaddeq was part of this riot and wanted to remove the obstacle of Kashani, yet Americans cheated him in the process and turned it against himself.
 
.
First time i went to England was in 1993.
I remember seeing several Akhonds in the airport.... and wondered why so many Akhonds go to England, while in Iran they shout death to England.....

But I lie..... according to the brain damaged.
 
.
i read that ayatollah was supported by western intel agency and he was calmly put on a plane and suddenly there was revolution. I belive that somewere down the line ayatollah turned on them becuase he throw out the bankers etc and they thought he was going to push iran back to stone age he did slow it down but that was due to reforms and revolution. shah was industralizing iran and this threatened western gangsters plus shah stop folowing thier orders.
so he had to go. i also read rafsanjani is crypto jew.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom